Snooker
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
10 Dec 09
19:42
Joined:
Date Joined:
02 May 09
http://sports.betfair.com/Index.do?mi=101005547&ex=1&origin=MRL
Surely going to be the game of the tournament?
Surely going to be the game of the tournament?
Show More
cant we stagemanage more controversy - make it more like wwf LOL
lay higgins
no way is he gonna knock in one of the 3 reds
no way is he gonna knock in one of the 3 reds
PMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMSLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
BOOOOOOOOOOOOooooooooooooooooooooooooooommmm
BOOOOOOOOOOOOooooooooooooooooooooooooooommmm
Booooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo... ;)
WTF !?!??!
he gives up !!!
he only needed 1 snooker !?!??! or ?
he gives up !!!
he only needed 1 snooker !?!??! or ?
Honestly although one snooker but no chance for Ronnie!
The fact Ronnie chucked that when only 1 snooker required tells you all you need to now about THAT incident in frame 13.
HE KNEW....
HE KNEW....
2 reds left what example does that show to people specially children growing up.what a joke ronnie is
best comeback then quit with 2 reds on the table,only 1 snooker needed,he's a disgrace
Only best comeback when they win Swindon to be fair!!
Mr. Ronnie Bean plays snooker for fun not for money or titles!
47 down, 43 on, table layout was horrible, and he had to get high valued colours off last two reds, which higgins would easily have defended against
so it was like needing two and a half snookers, and ronnie quite likely did not want to win a match of that sort in that manner
so it was like needing two and a half snookers, and ronnie quite likely did not want to win a match of that sort in that manner
SwindonBoy 12 Dec 22:02
lol terrible example best comeback ever
SwindonBoy 12 Dec 22:06
wasnt a bad fightback
Anyone else spot the difference ? ;)
lol terrible example best comeback ever
SwindonBoy 12 Dec 22:06
wasnt a bad fightback
Anyone else spot the difference ? ;)
I really think he conceded cos of the sh1t in the 13th frame.Surely there can be no other explanation.
Doesnt matter about the table layout Eldrick.one snooker is one snooker. surely you have to play on.
stop seething, nice all green book for me, was a awesome comeback despite losing
yes, one snooker but no you don't have to play on, players decision
if a player thinks they are 16/1 to win frame playing on, they generally will. if they think they are 40/1+ as ronnie actually was in this situation, they tend not to unless they are joe swail
if a player thinks they are 16/1 to win frame playing on, they generally will. if they think they are 40/1+ as ronnie actually was in this situation, they tend not to unless they are joe swail
Yeah no way Higgins or Hendry would have conceded there.
In a last frame decider to get to the final of the second biggest tournament, you play on. no matter what.
I agree with Eldrick there, Also I'm pretty sure the ref had it completely wrong earlier when after Ronnies foul, John had a look and the balls had moved, the ref then replaces them, WHY? It wasn't a miss, he has no right to touch the bloody things, John either goes from where they are or puts Ronnie back in, terrible**up
Tel me where i even hinted i was seething. i back higgins every tourney.U really need to look at yourself to see who is seething to be fair.
I ripped up my Ronnie outright slip @ 2-8, so I was bricking it for a while.
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539