best comeback then quit with 2 reds on the table,only 1 snooker needed,he's a disgrace

Once a Ronnie,always a Ronnie!

Justice - boo for the mockney shredded wheat

47 down, 43 on, table layout was horrible, and he had to get high valued colours off last two reds, which higgins would easily have defended against

so it was like needing two and a half snookers, and ronnie quite likely did not want to win a match of that sort in that manner

I really think he conceded cos of the sh1t in the 13th frame.Surely there can be no other explanation.

Doesnt matter about the table layout Eldrick.one snooker is one snooker. surely you have to play on.

I agree mad paddy.

yes, one snooker but no you don't have to play on, players decision

if a player thinks they are 16/1 to win frame playing on, they generally will. if they think they are 40/1+ as ronnie actually was in this situation, they tend not to unless they are joe swail

In a last frame decider to get to the final of the second biggest tournament, you play on. no matter what.

I agree with Eldrick there, Also I'm pretty sure the ref had it completely wrong earlier when after Ronnies foul, John had a look and the balls had moved, the ref then replaces them, WHY? It wasn't a miss, he has no right to touch the bloody things, John either goes from where they are or puts Ronnie back in, terrible**up

I ripped up my Ronnie outright slip @ 2-8, so I was bricking it for a while.