<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: mark anti snooker and blessed with luck selby......</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/snooker/go/thread/view/94174/30686495/mark-anti-snooker-and-blessed-with-luck-selby</link><description>should be banned from the game.... worst player ive ever watched he makes peter ebdon look exciting.</description><item><title>I would have Williams above Selby, even after he mops up a couple more from the weak minded wannabes.Higgins at 41 should not be reaching finals. He was a shadow of his best and were he at it he smashes Selby each and every time. Say what you like ab</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/snooker/go/thread/view/94174/30686495/mark-anti-snooker-and-blessed-with-luck-selby?post_id=551826213#551826213</link><description>I would have Williams above Selby, even after he mops up a couple more from the weak minded wannabes.Higgins at 41 should not be reaching finals. He was a shadow of his best and were he at it he smashes Selby each and every time. Say what you like ab</description><pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2017 16:32:22 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I didn't mean to place Williams above Selby, I'm undecided as to which one of them should be fourth. I would expect Selby to render the argument academic over the next three or four years, but right now it's a tough one because I think Williams beat</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/snooker/go/thread/view/94174/30686495/mark-anti-snooker-and-blessed-with-luck-selby?post_id=551823997#551823997</link><description>I didn't mean to place Williams above Selby, I'm undecided as to which one of them should be fourth. I would expect Selby to render the argument academic over the next three or four years, but right now it's a tough one because I think Williams beat</description><pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2017 13:40:22 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>jed - J.Higgins did win 3 World titles here before the scandal. I agree that he got off lightly, and I've always been of the opinion that B.Hearn took the easy way out banning him for 6 months. Either Higgins should have received no ban, as he did no</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/snooker/go/thread/view/94174/30686495/mark-anti-snooker-and-blessed-with-luck-selby?post_id=551823749#551823749</link><description>jed - J.Higgins did win 3 World titles here before the scandal. I agree that he got off lightly, and I've always been of the opinion that B.Hearn took the easy way out banning him for 6 months. Either Higgins should have received no ban, as he did no</description><pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2017 13:15:39 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Fair comment. Why Williams above Selby?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/snooker/go/thread/view/94174/30686495/mark-anti-snooker-and-blessed-with-luck-selby?post_id=551823495#551823495</link><description>Fair comment. Why Williams above Selby?</description><pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2017 12:49:52 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>It would have Hendry top, but I'd probably have O'Sullivan second and Davis third - I will not include Higgins because in my opinion he shouldn't be allowed to play professional snooker.Then I'd have Williams, Selby and White - I have to include Jimm</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/snooker/go/thread/view/94174/30686495/mark-anti-snooker-and-blessed-with-luck-selby?post_id=551823219#551823219</link><description>It would have Hendry top, but I'd probably have O'Sullivan second and Davis third - I will not include Higgins because in my opinion he shouldn't be allowed to play professional snooker.Then I'd have Williams, Selby and White - I have to include Jimm</description><pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2017 12:11:43 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Jed, my order would be Hendry, Davis, O'Sullivan, J Higgins and Selby, but I said top 6 in awareness that Reardon has won at the Crucible but as his era was really the early-mid seventies, maybe he shouldn't be included. I'd have A Higgins and Willia</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/snooker/go/thread/view/94174/30686495/mark-anti-snooker-and-blessed-with-luck-selby?post_id=551823067#551823067</link><description>Jed, my order would be Hendry, Davis, O'Sullivan, J Higgins and Selby, but I said top 6 in awareness that Reardon has won at the Crucible but as his era was really the early-mid seventies, maybe he shouldn't be included. I'd have A Higgins and Willia</description><pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2017 11:54:25 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>You don't win the world title 3 times or be world number 1 for years on end by being lucky</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/snooker/go/thread/view/94174/30686495/mark-anti-snooker-and-blessed-with-luck-selby?post_id=551820023#551820023</link><description>You don't win the world title 3 times or be world number 1 for years on end by being lucky</description><pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2017 03:59:18 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Interesting point howellsyWho are the top six of the Crucible era? And who would win a match between the 2017 Selby and the 2002/3 Williams? Where does White fit in, if at all? Is the order to be decided on Championships won, making Davis higher than</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/snooker/go/thread/view/94174/30686495/mark-anti-snooker-and-blessed-with-luck-selby?post_id=551820009#551820009</link><description>Interesting point howellsyWho are the top six of the Crucible era? And who would win a match between the 2017 Selby and the 2002/3 Williams? Where does White fit in, if at all? Is the order to be decided on Championships won, making Davis higher than</description><pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2017 03:56:16 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Sport is about winning within the rules. Mark plays within the rules and wins. The function of a sportsman is not to entertain but to win. If entertainment is generated in doing so, it's a bonus. Selby has lost one match in 4 years at the Crucible. O</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/snooker/go/thread/view/94174/30686495/mark-anti-snooker-and-blessed-with-luck-selby?post_id=551815715#551815715</link><description>Sport is about winning within the rules. Mark plays within the rules and wins. The function of a sportsman is not to entertain but to win. If entertainment is generated in doing so, it's a bonus. Selby has lost one match in 4 years at the Crucible. O</description><pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2017 12:25:23 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Selby a pleasure to watch in the long matches. Mental strength, tactical acumen, incredible will to win and refusal to cave in when in seemingly impossible position- trailing 10-4!- Snooker is about much more than potting balls, but oh yes he has tha</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/snooker/go/thread/view/94174/30686495/mark-anti-snooker-and-blessed-with-luck-selby?post_id=551813705#551813705</link><description>Selby a pleasure to watch in the long matches. Mental strength, tactical acumen, incredible will to win and refusal to cave in when in seemingly impossible position- trailing 10-4!- Snooker is about much more than potting balls, but oh yes he has tha</description><pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2017 06:18:59 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
