<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: What is the highest theoretical break in snooker?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/snooker/go/thread/view/94174/23913382/what-is-the-highest-theoretical-break-in-snooker</link><description>If I remember correctly you can score more than 155 - in a break, not a 'score'. How it is done?</description><item><title>Thats the one!Thank you.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/snooker/go/thread/view/94174/23913382/what-is-the-highest-theoretical-break-in-snooker?post_id=431057062#431057062</link><description>Thats the one!Thank you.</description><pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 08:41:33 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Occam's Razor 03 May 14:35 I had heard that before (infinite).How?something to do with the player and the ref permanently mistaking a colour for a red and realising their mistake after the next colour has been potted</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/snooker/go/thread/view/94174/23913382/what-is-the-highest-theoretical-break-in-snooker?post_id=431057058#431057058</link><description>Occam's Razor 03 May 14:35 I had heard that before (infinite).How?something to do with the player and the ref permanently mistaking a colour for a red and realising their mistake after the next colour has been potted</description><pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 08:40:30 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>There is a way which involves knocking balls off the table but I can't remember how.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/snooker/go/thread/view/94174/23913382/what-is-the-highest-theoretical-break-in-snooker?post_id=431057054#431057054</link><description>There is a way which involves knocking balls off the table but I can't remember how.</description><pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 08:38:59 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I don't think a respotted black would count towards a break, as your break finishes when you pot the black to draw. Then you have to draw to see who plays next. It's not a continuation of the break.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/snooker/go/thread/view/94174/23913382/what-is-the-highest-theoretical-break-in-snooker?post_id=431057050#431057050</link><description>I don't think a respotted black would count towards a break, as your break finishes when you pot the black to draw. Then you have to draw to see who plays next. It's not a continuation of the break.</description><pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 08:36:23 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I had heard that before (infinite).How?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/snooker/go/thread/view/94174/23913382/what-is-the-highest-theoretical-break-in-snooker?post_id=431057046#431057046</link><description>I had heard that before (infinite).How?</description><pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 08:35:56 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>and he's INCHH PERRRFECT ON THE BLACK !!!!!!!! :0</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/snooker/go/thread/view/94174/23913382/what-is-the-highest-theoretical-break-in-snooker?post_id=431057042#431057042</link><description>and he's INCHH PERRRFECT ON THE BLACK !!!!!!!! :0</description><pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 08:33:22 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Also, John Virgo would have spontaneously combusted by then, probably leading to an evacuation of the arena which would end the break.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/snooker/go/thread/view/94174/23913382/what-is-the-highest-theoretical-break-in-snooker?post_id=431057034#431057034</link><description>Also, John Virgo would have spontaneously combusted by then, probably leading to an evacuation of the arena which would end the break.</description><pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 08:31:04 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>technically the highest break possible is infinite</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/snooker/go/thread/view/94174/23913382/what-is-the-highest-theoretical-break-in-snooker?post_id=431057030#431057030</link><description>technically the highest break possible is infinite</description><pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 08:30:30 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Aah, you're wrong!Because when he goes above 147 behind, he'd need a snooker, so no miss would be called!(I must get out more)</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/snooker/go/thread/view/94174/23913382/what-is-the-highest-theoretical-break-in-snooker?post_id=431057026#431057026</link><description>Aah, you're wrong!Because when he goes above 147 behind, he'd need a snooker, so no miss would be called!(I must get out more)</description><pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 08:29:50 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>???? As soon as the player trying to escape from the snooker needed snookers to win then the miss rule would no longer apply. Also, are you mixing up 'total score' with 'break'?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/snooker/go/thread/view/94174/23913382/what-is-the-highest-theoretical-break-in-snooker?post_id=431057022#431057022</link><description>???? As soon as the player trying to escape from the snooker needed snookers to win then the miss rule would no longer apply. Also, are you mixing up 'total score' with 'break'?</description><pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 08:29:23 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
