<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Leeds v Manly - WCC Fri 20:00</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/rugby/go/thread/view/94158/28921329/leeds-v-manly---wcc-fri-2000</link><description>Probable line ups:Leeds:1. Brent Webb2. Ben Jones Bishop3. Kallum Watkins4. Zak Hardaker5. Ryan Hall6. Kevin Sinfield7. Danny Mcguiire8. Kylie Leuluai9. Paul McShane10. Jamie Peacock11. Jamie Jones Buchanan12. Brett Delaney13. Weller Hauraki14. Rob B</description><item><title>3x World Club Challenge Champions!</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/rugby/go/thread/view/94158/28921329/leeds-v-manly---wcc-fri-2000?post_id=516519519#516519519</link><description>3x World Club Challenge Champions!</description><pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 10:57:47 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Nobody said that wouldn't be the case Moaner, Manly are clearly a better team. Not tonight though.ballaman - you are right, and it's very frustrating to see. It's a tough game, nobody wants to see that toned down, but some of the cheap shots and outr</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/rugby/go/thread/view/94158/28921329/leeds-v-manly---wcc-fri-2000?post_id=516487557#516487557</link><description>Nobody said that wouldn't be the case Moaner, Manly are clearly a better team. Not tonight though.ballaman - you are right, and it's very frustrating to see. It's a tough game, nobody wants to see that toned down, but some of the cheap shots and outr</description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 15:56:32 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Might need to re-watch it later this evening, but my initial thought was that, with maybe one or two more games under their belt, Manly may have been 20+ points better?Takes nothing away from an exceptional Leeds effort. They deserved to win tonight,</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/rugby/go/thread/view/94158/28921329/leeds-v-manly---wcc-fri-2000?post_id=516487403#516487403</link><description>Might need to re-watch it later this evening, but my initial thought was that, with maybe one or two more games under their belt, Manly may have been 20+ points better?Takes nothing away from an exceptional Leeds effort. They deserved to win tonight,</description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 15:52:24 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>RM ive been saying this for years, in RL the headshot and high tackle is virtually acceptable now and only gets pulled every other time, third man in on the attckers supporting leg and leading with the elbow are all commonplace and unpunished in virt</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/rugby/go/thread/view/94158/28921329/leeds-v-manly---wcc-fri-2000?post_id=516487365#516487365</link><description>RM ive been saying this for years, in RL the headshot and high tackle is virtually acceptable now and only gets pulled every other time, third man in on the attckers supporting leg and leading with the elbow are all commonplace and unpunished in virt</description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 15:51:20 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Cameraman worked out a way to get himself on telly there.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/rugby/go/thread/view/94158/28921329/leeds-v-manly---wcc-fri-2000?post_id=516487355#516487355</link><description>Cameraman worked out a way to get himself on telly there.</description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 15:51:10 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>cant agree moaner tbh</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/rugby/go/thread/view/94158/28921329/leeds-v-manly---wcc-fri-2000?post_id=516487221#516487221</link><description>cant agree moaner tbh</description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 15:47:15 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Majority of the game?Manly had a hell of a lot of play second half, but even then they probably didn't look any more likely to score than Leeds. First half Leeds went in 10pts up for a good reason - they were the better team.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/rugby/go/thread/view/94158/28921329/leeds-v-manly---wcc-fri-2000?post_id=516487191#516487191</link><description>Majority of the game?Manly had a hell of a lot of play second half, but even then they probably didn't look any more likely to score than Leeds. First half Leeds went in 10pts up for a good reason - they were the better team.</description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 15:46:12 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Moaner you are joking??Manly had some good play but it was mostly emperor's clothes.The board does not lie here. Leeds deserved.  Manly were so under done it was a joke and fair play to those who pointed it out and bet accordingly</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/rugby/go/thread/view/94158/28921329/leeds-v-manly---wcc-fri-2000?post_id=516487187#516487187</link><description>Moaner you are joking??Manly had some good play but it was mostly emperor's clothes.The board does not lie here. Leeds deserved.  Manly were so under done it was a joke and fair play to those who pointed it out and bet accordingly</description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 15:46:10 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I can see why he thought they would score, but cant see how 1.6 was the price to do it at.Got my week off to a good start, although that happened last week and I ended up completely ruining it!</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/rugby/go/thread/view/94158/28921329/leeds-v-manly---wcc-fri-2000?post_id=516487133#516487133</link><description>I can see why he thought they would score, but cant see how 1.6 was the price to do it at.Got my week off to a good start, although that happened last week and I ended up completely ruining it!</description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 15:45:03 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Leeds will be happy, but as a RL fan, it's quite sad just how much better Manly were for the majority of the game.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/rugby/go/thread/view/94158/28921329/leeds-v-manly---wcc-fri-2000?post_id=516487101#516487101</link><description>Leeds will be happy, but as a RL fan, it's quite sad just how much better Manly were for the majority of the game.</description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 15:44:18 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
