Tommy Robinson treatment....

Oh ok. With it not being an own priority of yours I must express that I find your statement about the lack of empathy a bit weird then.

I can not blanket promise a yes/no. As a really tremendously shrewd dude you might want to trap me into a yes/no situation when it's a complex situation. Feel free to try though. If an answer that goes beyond "yes" or "no" does strain your brain too much, you can also ctrl+f for either of those words and simply not read the rest yourself.

So what would you like to ask me, dear Sir?

Are you the forumite with the most posts?

Yes/No

That's a very weird question. It could also be potentially very difficult to answer. As, after all, how could I be sure of a "yes" without having had seen every profile of every forumite? I hope you would agree that is something plain unreasonable to expect from me. I cannot say I am impressed by that easy to see lack of very basic understanding of your own question and its suitability to be answered with "yes".

Luckily for you however, from the top of my head I know of one poster who has more posts than I do. So with utmost certainty my answer to you can indeed be a "No, I am not the forumite with the most posts on this forum."

Is that a half yes and a half no then?

No, if I tell you that there is at least one person with more posts and I conclude it with a an utmost certain assessment of "No, I am not the forumite with the most posts on this forum.", it should not be understood as half a yes by the shrewd people among us.

Did your brain check out after the first few words to even ask that kind of follow-up in return to my assessment that I gave an "utmost certainty"" grade to?

We have some unfortunate things in Britain edy.

We piss and moan about the weather. We queue up for everything. We say we are okay if we have lost a leg that day and we can also answer a binary question with a yes or no.

I am sorry that my very clear and with certainty spoken answer of "No" really does seem to have overloaded your brain because it contained a few additional words.

There's something I'd like to know. So you seem to deem your question suitable for a "yes" answer. I laid out why I deem it unreasoable, or even impossible, to give a "yes" to that question with a high degree of certainty. Why do you feel it is nonetheless suitable? How can you possibly expect someone, me, to be aware of the post counts of every poster on a forum of a big internationally operating company?

Please do share your undoubtedly shrewd reasoning of why you seem to continue to insist that that is a reasonable expectation of yours to have.

I gave you the respect of answering a number of questions you asked me with a simple yes/no.

I expected you to be able to reciprocate when I asked you a question.

Instead you reply with your usual several sentence and/or multiple post responses.

I'm not going to reply to you anymore.

It is true that you anwered my questions with a simple yes/no, but ... I never asked you to do that and I frankly doubt you chose that way because you wanted to be respectful and give me the best possible answer I desired most. I would have loved longer, more elaborate answers (as you will most likely know).

It is also true that I did not answer your question with a mere "yes" (which your question is thoroughly unsuitable for, which is why you now pretend I'm being disrespectful instead of you engaging me on why you deem it suitable upon my request for clarification) or "no", but I had also never promised to do so and I would never expect or demand anyone else to do so (especially not if it's an unsuitable question like yours).

Still, I gave you an answer that contained

Luckily for you however, from the top of my head I know of one poster who has more posts than I do. So with utmost certainty my answer to you can indeed be a "No, I am not the forumite with the most posts on this forum."

I mean...are you sure want to throw a hissy fit here about me not daring to just give a yes or no?

Wonder if you are the kind of person that goes like:

"Hey, I did all these things you never asked for or even wanted that way. I did them the way I wanted to really against what would have been your wish. It is so very incredibly rude of you to not reciprocate in exactly the way I demand!"

Actually, I don't have to wonder. It is what you just pulled off.

Thanks edy, have a good night.

Sleep tight, love!

smile2jannah
@smile2jannah
People raged over claims Tommy Robinson was mistreated in prison, but in court, it turned out he was lying—he was actually getting special treatment and living comfortably.

Two tier Tommy,unreal..

https://x.com/smile2jannah/status/1902773142541766903

Two Tier justice system

Stephen Yaxley a white man gets special and privileged treatment

Two Tier justice system

Stephen Yaxley a white man gets special and privileged treatment

Well I never

After watching the above link am relieved Tommy is getting treated as he should......I did say "apparently" in OP.

Which lying thug had made you believe he was getting bigtime mistreated?

Being in prison is affecting Yaxley-Lenon’s mental elf says his solicitor

No Shiite Sherlock!

Oh dear his Brief is awful and fishing. Don’t think he is going to get off.

After his treatment he will be known as Tammy Robinson going forward.

He wants two tier justice!

White Privilege

Can’t understand why he is not getting it

Mental elf card

Being in prison is affecting Yaxley-Lenon’s mental elf says his solicitor

surely he's used to it by now after multiple helpings of porridge?

Worrying about his mental health, he was already a psycho

Sex cases free  to go  Slap on the Wrist , no doubt the lads on here delighted  when this happens , Get the names on the register that'll sort em out

Batter someone while Tanked up 3 Days

contempt of Court Bang Em up

I wonder what outcome Councillor Slasher  will have ? No doubt a hero to many of the posters on here

Free Tommy

Mar 22, 2025 -- 7:04PM, edy wrote:

Which lying thug had made you believe he was getting bigtime mistreated?

Do you remember, DancingBraveTheBest? It is always good to remember the lying thugs in your life.

Can't do the time... Don't do the right wing grift crime

CC   disgusting remark.....hope you feel proud of yourself

Yes Edy....i do

Can you share them so others can also learn who the lying, manipulative thug was?

If it was an online person of course.

No

Seems you are ok to feel sympathy for a fascist scumbag without criticism

What have people got against Yackety Yaxley? I have never heard him saying anything racist. He grew up in multi-racial Luton and has friends of all colours. It's the usual cultprits no doubt believing main stream lies.

Why do you keep calling him Yackety Yaxley instead of by his proper name?

That shut the despicable hater right up.

Because he never stops yakking.

Does Tommy throw Boiling oil at prison Guards and Slash them with home made blades nearly killing a female officer ?

Thats what I call despicable Hate EDY , what do you think ?

That does indeed sound even worse than the hate Ronald keeps showing towards Robinson.

Abedi reaping wot Yaxley sows innit!

People seem to forget (if they ever even knew) that Tommy shut down the real far right and rejected their help.
Now they get angry at him because he knows more about what certain religious followers believe than they do….and get angry when he tells the truth.

The man knew what he would get for doing it the way he did. He has only a few months to go so don’t sweat it.
The question is how badly the state fear him and to what extent they will continue frivolous charges once he is released.

The truth is why he is in jail!

He doesn’t know what it is!

He us in jail for telling lies and repeating those LIES

He is in jail because he committed contempt of court, where a judge made a single decision on a complex case.

We saw this play out during the summer riots.
Where individuals took the bait of a reduced guilty plea they got absolutely hammered by individual judges who dished out harsh verdicts that don’t tally with the majority opinion of the nation.
We know this as those who didn’t take the bait and went to trial to be judged by their peers got found not guilty.

I agree with WD the truth is why he is in jail! The establishment does not like the truth being told about grooming gangs. WD makes a very good argument for the impeachment of the these rogue judges and prosecutors who keep bringing frivolous cases.

‘Majority opinion’ of racist, tattooed thugs

Lawfare innit Clown!

If you go to jail gif a decision you don’t like it’s lawfare not justice.

I love your World Clown. Send me a link to your dealer!

Yaxley is guilty of opening his gob

I agree WD, if you are sent to jail over saying something they don't like it's lawfare. I never thought I would agree with you on so many issues.

Tommy went to jail knowing he would, by using unconventional means to challenge a verdict he felt was wrong.
Those who always seem to pump their gums about what they think they know of the circumstances regarding these issues, rarely do.
They no doubt havnt actually studied the details of the case in question, and likely haven’t seen any of the productions that Tommy went to jail in making public.

They do however know that people went to jail for drawing parallels between terrorism of recent times and the event that happened in Southport.
When it was declared within 24/48 to specifically not be terrorism related. (Quite how you can declare a negative so quickly is beyond me, you can ofc declare a positive so quickly)
And when latterly the data was released that there were arguably terrorism related actions the perp was doing at the time, there wasn’t then a review of the sentencing, when anyone would consider that grounds for appeal.

We also saw a prime minister and Home Secretary both use the argument that speculation on events by the public could risk prejudicing a trial…..then went and did that very thing themselves.

We also saw sentences handed out the likes we have never seen before for opinion, where the accused took a guilty plea option.

These are the reasons Tommy didn’t feel exactly confident in appealing the judge’s ruling.

Poor old Tommy heart is bleeding for this idiot. Along with the thugs who took a guilty plea, err because they were guilty. Sad for them as they were about to complete their face tattoos.

I saw an interesting stat recently.
That in Rotherham, a town blighted by rape gang activity, there are more people in jail for positing opinion and/or being involved in the summer riots, than are in jail for the wide scale rape of local children.

We had a Public Prosecutor who actively went after rape gang suspects…..until he entered politics.

‘Widescale rape’, what planet are you living on?

It's very clear lawfare is being used to silence him because they don't like what he said about grooming gangs. He may have technically broken a law, but that doesn't justify the extreme over-prosecution and over-sentencing of him in this and previous cases. That indicates lawfare, or a two tiered justice system very clearly. Other people who are not saying what Tommy is saying about grooming gangs would not have been so overzealously prosecuted.

Christy and Wd   Sex cases  and Bombers out  , Tommy in

Christy involved again where children have been mentioned

Appears to think men having sex with Pre Teens is normal

Nope, it is you who terms children as ‘beautiful’, boys and girls you don’t mind which apparently.

And it is reform loons who are obsessed with child rape, they see it everywhere, probably existing in their heads only.

I sussed CC out straight away.....someone to definitely avoid.....seems an unsavoury character imo....therefore I will avoid

What a shame, racist scum.

Think that was Taken from the Media Christy   Copied

You forgot to say MSM, tut tut, Russians going to be mad with you.

Lawfare init.

Two tier

People who plead guilty when they are guilty

So unfair!

didn't read the sentencing guidelines only themselves to blame

Yeah

Who’da thought it

Pleaded guilty when you are guilty?

Lawfare innit!

Did Councillor Slasher plead guilty , I wonder what his defence will be , Perhaps that the Stine marches will be at a loss without him singing along

Poor Yaxley,

Worlds biggest loser loses AGAIN

Can’t do the time then don’t do the crime!

What a pathetic whinger.  And wait to hea4 the whimpering from the Usual Suspects.

It’s sooooo unfair!

https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/HM-Solicitor-General-v-Y...

https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/stephen-yaxley-lennon-v-hm-solicitor-gene...

If other forumites are using liveview, longer links like yours are getting truncated for those users if the links stand alone, jollyswagman. So it is generally better to accompany the links with some sort of text following them. This can be as little as a single character. Like so:

https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/HM-Solicitor-General-v-Yaxley-Lennon-Judgment.pdf

.

https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/stephen-yaxley-lennon-v-hm-solicitor-general-and-another

This way the links get shown in full even to users of liveview on this forum.

thanks edy, i am a confirmed luddite.

i do believe i made the same error before and you kindly told me what to do to avoid making this mistake.

hopefully you wont need to tell me a third time.

I fancy he just wanted a day out

Sounds like he wants to get killed! Why not let him go into general population. Maybe put him in a cell with the Manchester incel. Might save the tax payer some money.

Surely they could let him out Early with one of those Tags that Starmer Favours ?

or are they only for Pedos ?

Why?

Just put him into general population like he wants.

You mean the Population that is being run by Jihadis WD  ?

Maybe there is some sort of provision against releasing serial offenders early that are at a very high risk to keep and keep and keep violating the laws of the land.

the old nanny ;-) • April 16, 2025 1:44 PM BST
You mean the Population that is being run by Jihadis WD  ?

Judging by his fight to be among them, maybe it is Tommy Robinson's wish to be the ultimate martyr and die at their hands.

Do Jihadists rule in German Prisons EDY ?

Not as far as I am aware. Not a serial offender though, so I have not checked them out myself.

Is there space in your Prisons , Or does your Government also turf all sorts out early wearing Tags that dont work ?

Germany has a far lower incarceration rate (i.e. amount of people in prison per 100.000 people living in the country) than England and Wales. Germany houses 68 prisoners per 100k people. For England and Wales the combined number is apparently at about 140.

There are local hotspots where prisons are full, but seen federally there are still some spots available. Nonetheless there are some measures or discussions to reduce the prison population and also save costs. E.g. if you do some petty crime, get given a fine that you then refuse to pay or cannot pay or aren't smart enough to negotiate community service in its stead, you traditionally have to go to prison for some time. About 10% of all prisoners in Germany at any time was from this crowd of people.

This hasn't been done away with, but it has been paused here and there. Primarily because it simply is hella expensive.

Sounds like he wants to get killed! Why not let him go into general population

he knows that was never going to happen, he just wanted to appear a martyr for his moronic supporters

Send more money for another appeal

Lawyers need holidays too

Kerching

Send more money for another appeal

Lawyers need holidays too

Kerching

How would he know? He has been attacked before in prison by terrorists and was lucky to survive.

Lucky to survive? It was his manly manliness. Nothing lucky about it.

That's how he lost his teeth.

Oh, he didn't just let his fans pay for his shiny veneers for vanity reasons and after bad dental hygiene?

Maybe it's a sneaky cover story!

Could we send him to Rwanda or El Salvador?

Do his Usual Suspect fan boys really think he wants to go into general population? Mugs!

Yeah, prisons brim full of radical Islamists
Who’da thought it?
Not Starmer et al obviously since they attempting to change the meaning of language to better accommodate them.

Starmer is quite an act ofc
Gaslit the nation about ‘jumping on far right bandwagons’….only to jump on a ‘far right’ bandwagon himself in an attempt to ride out recent interest garnered by Musk’s international focus.
He also gaslit the nation telling them the ‘far right’ was the greatest threat to the country…..only to get undermined almost instantly by the MI5 who gave that actual truth.

And all the people who just bore on about Tommy and his funds always ignore all the heavily subsidies left wing charities who are on a downward spiral after their funding being cut in many different ways, mainly because the brigadoon they were trying to have the people imagine turned out to be a set of grifts.

The prisons wouldn't be full of radical islamists if the tories had run the country for 40 of the last 50 years.