Politics
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 48 comments are related to the topic:
LABOUR WITH LESS VOTES THAN 2019
LABOUR WITH LESS VOTES THAN 2019
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 48
|
By:
yes the vote shares would have been different and actually represented how people wanted to vote
|
|
By:
Of course the King takes his lead from Parliament that’s why he invited Cameron to form a Government but if Brown had dun a deal with the Libtards he could have remained as Prime Minister
|
|
By:
Whisperingdeath • July 5, 2024 11:29 AM BST
No it’s not! The King decides firstly who he thinks can form a Government |
|
By:
Go back to Victoria and learn
|
|
By:
Cleggy chose Cameron over Brown, Labour tried to get
Clegg to do a deal by getting rid of Brown and offering coalition with a different leader. Clegg stuck with Cameron. But whichever side had Clegg held a majority so would have formed government. Clegg forgot that most of his votes came from left and so he and his party were punished by electorate. It's doubtful lib dems again choose to form coalition, and in future have an informal agreement with largest party, so they can build their fragile base of discontents. |
|
By:
Next election must be all to play for already with
left wing hitting Starmer and right wing the tories. Hence why Starmer needs to keep tories and refuk divided. |
|
By:
Whisperingdeath • July 5, 2024 11:58 AM BST
Of course the King takes his lead from Parliament that’s why he invited Cameron to form a Government but if Brown had dun a deal with the Libtards he could have remained as Prime Minister iirc Brown had first go at forming a government, but the lib dems weren't offering support, so he had to resign and advise the queen to ask Cameron to try to form a government. He could of course have lied like theresa may and said he had support agreed (in her case with the ulster lunatics). |
|
By:
Change
What us going to change? |
|
By:
You called it edy, no Germans in ze Euros.
 |