By:
Who are your top10 favourite constant wacist wacist wacist screamers whose delicious salty tears the two of us shall bath in come July 5th?
|
By:
so any vote for reform is considered wacist ?
|
By:
Because, man, will the loony lefties be shedding bitter tears on that day and be owned so good.
|
By:
Why is it always raining in Germany, edy? Every time I look at the footy it's pouring down.
|
By:
Got to be honest. Toying with Cider and just seeing the way he jumps to their defence every single time is just too amusing to pass up. I'll try to do better.
|
By:
It's not always raining in all of Germany. It's only always raining in Hamburg. The other places have just been unlucky these Euros.
|
By:
The past few weeks there were grass court tennis tournaments in Bad Homburg and Berlin. Were able to complete them on the correct day and without having to go indoors even though grass tennis, unlike especially clay tennis, tolerates near to no salty liberal tears.
|
By:
That must be a relief for a tennis lover like you. Hamburg sounds terrible a bit like Manchester, perhaps you could hand it back to the Danes.
|
By:
The Hamburgers chose to built a roof over their tennis court instead of ceding control to another nation.
|
By:
We Germans are inventive problem solvers like that.
|
By:
I am not joking though when I tell you that some regions somewhat glorify Danes (and especially Swedes) for their past roles in their towns and region. E.g. parts of Pommerania and Mecklenburg think back very fondly of Swedish rule because the Swedes (with a decently sized crowd of Scottish mercenaries) helped them defeat the nasty Kaiser and his good called Wallenstein that tried to kill all the Pommeranians.
|
By:
*goon called Wallenstein
|
By:
Pomeranians are just little dogs, the Scottish mercenaries should
be ashamed |
By:
Which Kaiser was that? I'm not up to speed with those events but know that the Swedes rather fancied themselves in battle until they did a census and discovered that they were a bit outnumbered by their neighbours.
|
By:
I suspect the average Brit doesn't have a clue where Pomerania is.
|
By:
Pommerania is the very north east of current Germany and Poland's north. This is all the 30 year war. The relevant Kaiser is Ferdinand II. of the Holy Roman Empire who tried to get the protestant Hanse towns of the north under his control. Most famous is the goon Wallenstein besieging the rich Hanse town of Stralsund after the Stralsundians declined to submit to the kaiserian troops and rule. Stralsund asked the Danes and Swedes for help, which was delivered and Wallenstein chose to withdraw eventually.
Following the 30 year war Sweden ruled over parts of Pommerania until it eventually became part of Prussia. As a Pommeranian I know that the time of Swedish intervention and then Swedish rule is generally looked at very fondly. Short summary, but with the additional given information it should now be possible to find a less brief summary for anyone interested. |
By:
https://www.wismar-stralsund.de/en/world_heritage/history/swedish_period/
Here are administrations of Wismar and Stralsund telling a bit about it on their united Unesco World Heritage website. |
By:
Thanks edy, that situates it on the timeline for me, early 17th Century.
|
By:
A lot of the so called racist dog whistles are not even audible to dogs, they are only audible to loony lefties.
|
By:
That's right Ronnie, Reform voters like us won't be changing our minds so it makes no difference.
|
By:
Genuine Q:
Is there anything Farage or your local Reform candidate could say over the next few days that would make you consider your vote or will you just vote for them no matter what? |
By:
|
By:
Why would the dog whistles not be audible to dogs if they are produced by a human? According to the Guinness Book of World Records, the highest note ever whistled by a human had 10,599 Hz. The higher end of the hearing range of dogs is typically in the 40k Hz.
What is the basis for your claim, Ronnie? |
By:
Yes. quite a lot. He could start talking like Ed Miliband or expressing support for all the other labour party ****, I would withdraw my support in an instant. He won't though.
|
By:
ok, understood
|
By:
Gonna be a long 5 years...
|
By:
Got to be honest. Toying with Cider and just seeing the way he jumps to their defence every single time is just too amusing to pass up. I'll try to do better.
Nah, you're doing a great impression of someone you would call a gammon. Keep it up |
By:
PorcupineorPineapple • June 30, 2024 3:43 PM BST
Just seen the vid of the Led By Donkeys poster being lowered down. Farage's response? Demanding that someone gets the sack. He's just the absolute worst grass isn't he. Every little affront and he wants someone's head on the block. Imagine working alongside someone like that. God it must be horrible. You got me there tbf, I thought you were being yourself and getting all triggered about something completely trivial. |
By:
I was "triggered" by his automatic response of demanding someone get the sack. Just think that's pretty lowly behaviour if I'm honest. He's a well-known and divisive politician on a stage. People are going to try to make fun and pull stunts. Most people would accept that as part of their chosen vocation and not look to harm's someone's livelihood. Reckon it says a lot about his character.
|
By:
You were claiming (bizarrely) that you were just toying with me. Doesn't seem so there. You (and others) are obviously triggered by ruk.
The OP is correct in their inference. There is an obvious incompatibility between the amount of negativity and noise ruk and Farage triggers in people on here compared to how successful they expect they will be in this election. |
By:
You just jump in front of their bullets so quickly and so readily that I just find myself drawn. Will be over soon though and we can all go back to other stuff.
|
By:
That thread is obviously a pro Reform one and is now almost 700 posts. Much of which are from people who aren't voting for Reform, but triggered by them.
|
By:
What share of the vote are you expecting ruk to achieve, and how many seats ?
|
By:
Rough guess - 17% and 4 seats. But I've gotten a bit bored of trying to study it and moved back to footy so don't go betting your mortgage on that please.
|
By:
Too low imo. The silent majority of real people should sit closer to 25%.
|
By:
Though I might overestimate it because the silent majority tends to be louder than the loud minority.
|
By:
|
By:
Have you decided who you will be voting for, Ronald?
|
By:
Sunak is also keen on mimicking looney left EU energy policy and would waste billions every year trying to achieve the unachievable given the chance.
|