By:
You only say that because you don't like facts and that's why you lose so much money. No serious punter ignores the facts in favour of false media narratives.
|
By:
Seems Charlie is very factually correct here.
|
By:
Why not just say that on the thread he posts on and has created then?
This thread will no doubt disappear in the same way as Nobbies thread about Irish one’s mental health as it should. Sack up and target the threads he has posted on rather starting a thread trying to abuse and bully him. |
By:
The threads he started didn't ask if he was a tw@t. Abuse and bully him ffs read his posts.
|
By:
I am not reporting it, I think it's good that we can see Charlie's level.
|
By:
What are you looking to achieve by this? It’s clear you and those responding to him think he is a **** based on his posts.
Starting a thread about him comes across as unsavoury because you want to attract the attention of people who don’t read his threads to suggest he is a ****. Just call him a **** on the thread he creates or posts on and provide a reason rather than seeking attention from those that may have no interest in his threads |
By:
I think you'll find I have.
|
By:
I know you have some what was the purpose of this thread?
|
By:
*so
|
By:
And to further explain yes I do want to attract the attention of people who don't read his threads and suggest he is a tw@t. He's a tw@t because he posts misleading topics and then can't defend his stance and then goes on to change his argument. He accuses people of relying on media when all of us do and then magically has his own source of media which is truer than other peoples.
|
By:
Starting a thread and then saying he didn't mean it is fckin stupid.
|
By:
Okay. That’s fine if you feel that way.
I don’t think it is good for the forum if we all just started opening threads about the people we think are twats though. |
By:
His only purpose in life seems to be defend the orange turd and no amount of facts will sway him from that, but the worst thing is he will not accept facts.
Does that answer your question shrewd or do you want more? |
By:
Anyone intenionally starting misleading threads should be called a tw@t.
|
By:
misspelled but you know what I mean
|
By:
I don't have my own magical source of media, I read many different sources. You can't understand anything by only listening to left wing media sources because you will only ever hear one point of view on most major issues. If it's about Trump you won't hear anything other than orange man bad all the time.
|
By:
You haven't got any facts Charlie, all you do is parrot media talking points.
|
By:
Go on then give us some insight to your sources of info.
|
By:
If you think my threads are misleading you always try and correct me if you know better, or you can ignore them. No one forces you to reply.
|
By:
I do try and correct you as you well know. Now then about these magical sources of info.
|
By:
I agree with everything you said there Charlie. If you think someone is a **** and spreading disinformation you are perfectly entitled to call that out.
I just think it would be best to do that on the thread a person has created rather than creating a thread about a particular forum item that comes across as bullying and will no doubt be deleted. |
By:
I have said, several times, that he is posting misinformation but it doesn't stop him from doing it. He always resorts to the same old things that we only read the media that suits us, Biden is bad, Trump is god and it's gone on for years, don't be fooled into believing that this is his first username, it isn't.
|
By:
It depends what area. If it's on legal issues Alan Dershowits is very knowledgeable and his legal predictions have a good track record of being correct. He's a Democrat voter but he is not biased. He has represented Democrats and Republicans. He was on the OJ Simpson dream team. And there's Johnathon Turley, Elie Honig, Lawrence Tribe and a few others. Tribes predictions are not so good because he seems to predict what he would like to happen rather than what is likely.
|
By:
And they're not media?
|
By:
Direct line to them obviously
|
By:
I forgot that.
|
By:
The trouble with Charlie is he is so full of TDS he can't accept another point of view. He likes what they say on the leftie media because it reinforces his orange man bad TDS mentality. TDS is a genuine mental illness. You don't see people behaving this irrationally when it's anyone else but Trump.
|
By:
yikes, Alan Dershowits of jeffrey epstein fame???
|
By:
What do mean direct line? They are on twitter and youtube and other social media and they make appearances on independent media and leftie media and right wing media. Why would I need a direct line? You lefties talk some nonsense.
|
By:
Get it right clown it's orange turd.
|
By:
That's shocking jollyswagman, what was he indicted for?
|
By:
|
By:
So when you say you believe I in media you mean media you believe in media.
|
By:
I don't think you need to believe in any media, you just need to listen to more than one point of view to get a balanced view. If you only listen to left wing media you will only ever get one point of view on most issues.
|
By:
Media, of course, media, the media you don't trust.
Lol |
By:
Was Dershowitz indicted for something to do with epstein jollyswagman?
|
By:
Balanced
|
By:
The media I trust is better than your media because I watch the right media and you don't.
|
By:
I know he was Epsteins lawyer but he has represented loads of people. He's been practising law for over 60 years and his legal predictions are usually right.
|