British Taxpayers £140 k support of Rwanda tourists

there will be even more coming when they find out about this

irishone
What a pathetic individual you are. Your pure hatred of the UK drives your life; you wake up and post your hatred, you post your hatred before you go to bed and no doubt you dream of UK hatred. Did you flee to Spain for being found out? A sad, sad ex IRA or New IRA thug, which one?

Don't be shy and run away.

Housing,Food and Healthcare  all on the British Tax Payer

370 million put aside to cover five year period

UK taxpayers to bear extra cost over Rwanda treaty
This article is more than 4 months old
Ministers have given more than £140m to Rwandan government in hope of sending asylum seekers to east Africa

I think the government needs to source more countries for this taxpayer ever-enlarging money pit. This is to show UK Plc means business and no longer soft and hospitable to economic and illegal migrants.

Only one illegal entry economic migrant on the plane but plenty more deterred.
Many not fulfilling their obligation to keep in contact with the home office ,therefore saving their hotel bill and voiding their frivolous asylum scam.
Many staying in Africa.
Many staying in mainland Europe.
Many swerving to Ireland ,lets hope they like golf.
Far too little too late but imagine an outfit was running the country with an ounce of conviction instead of the fake tory appeasers.

Britains will reap their rewards in heaven.

God sees everything.

Any brits looking to move to Ireland in the next year or so, I can give you £500,pay for the ferry and rent free for 3 months and good culture through the summer, better than that **** the torys have left

Verucca positioned Ireland as the foremost woke "virtue signallers" of Europe.
He refused to negotiate UK-Ireland as equal partners ,preferring to involve his EU puppet masters and people like Barnier and the forgettable Slovak Stuccofix ,even playing his joker, the fool Biden.......so now as the illegal entry economic migrants are rushed thru the "golden highway" ,Italy-France-UK ,they now head to Dublin and the golf course ,this is now a UK-EU matter and Ireland just become the lucky recipients.

Forget Leo,Simon and Helen, all going switchy for Sinn Fein in polls.

It's a cheap one Flat, collusion,people trafficking, British Gov all kinda in the same sentence there.

Is this the height of it? Not a good look.

Cheap ,concise and true ............I can live with that ,karma and we won both the gns.
Btw Ireland will not forget Leo.

I know that Flat and agree but i think years down the line.

1.1 million asylum claims were made in the EU in 2023 ,mainly entering thru places like Cyprus ,the Canaries ,Spain and Italy.
Take Lampedusa for example ,156,000 in 2023 ,more than doubling from the previous year.
With all this mass economic migration and at least the same number going west to the US ,Africas' population has not dipped but rises at a truly amazing rate.
Sanctimonious wokery is not the answer to this worldwide problem.

A failed asylum seeker can ask for £3k as repatriation money to leave the UK. However, if refuses entry for breaching visa condition at the airport a detention follows, then the next available flight back to country of origin.

The failed asylum seekers are about 29% and they have nowhere to go ,so we have great difficulty sending them back ,especially if their claim is fraudulent ,wrong name/age/origin etc.
So although it is rewarding crime ,3k is a steal.
Otherwise he might disappear into the "black economy" or maybe into crime or keep entering countless ludicrous appeals.

Suella has dad's army stationed around the south coast, every thing's good.

Of course we could steer him towards Ireland but that would be mean and his 3 large won't go very far over there.
Last time I was there was 8.60£ a pint and you can't find a decent bitter.

How do countries in East Asia and the Far East eg Singapore, Malaysia, Japan, China, S Korea, Taiwan, etc, deal with illegal immigrants? Maybe UK Plc can adopt their policies.

I believe any probable economic illegal immigrants ought not to be given hospitality and welfare eg accommodation and food. These people can use their own money to pay for their living costs.

I'm not voting Labour. I'm voting Conservative again; Sir Starmer has vowed to scrapped the Rwanda scheme straight away if Labour wins the General Election.

I cannot vote Labour if the Rwanda scheme is scrapped prior to a radical, workable and practical similar scheme is in place. I firmly believe this is another own-goal by the Labour leader so soon after not calling a ceasefire on the Gaza conflict until just recently.

Voting for the nasties again after 14 years of an absolute sh!te show rules you out of any sensible debate.

The Rwanda scheme isn't working and never will, it's a gimmick because they have no sensible plan. There's over 120,000 applicants waiting to be processed. How long will that take? 

When did Sunak ask for a ceasefire?

Rwanda may be a gimmick however, it has its desire effect ie some recent arrivals decamped elsewhere including Europe. Also, this scheme could eventually get the Europeans esp French to start some serious discussion. at the moment the French are telling us "it's your problem", not ours.

I cannot vote for Sir Starmer; he always puts politics before what is good for the people eg innocent Gazans and British. To me war zones sufferers come 1st, then UK Plc. The Labour Party can come next.

This is not about what the sh1t Conservatives have done. It's about UK sovereignty esp the gradual incessant eradication of British values; traditions; culture; language; NHS; education. Soon everything the British hold dear could/would be at risk.

Go on then tell us which of those things the nasties have done in the last 14 years.

I'll rewrite that as it wasn't a good sentence by me.

There is zero evidence the Rwanda gimmick is working, there are more boat crossings than ever.

What has Sunak done about Israel?

What have the nasties done to stop the gradual incessant eradication of British values; traditions; culture; language; NHS; education In fact name a good thing the nasties have done in the last 14 years.

The "nasties" have publicly voiced and brought to the attention of the British people the Labour Party is influenced by Islamists and extremists eg immigrant parents (unrelated to the school concerned) tried to intimidate the working and teaching of a primary school; the industrial sexual abuse of young white females in some towns up north populated by Pakistanis for over two decades was not addressed legally, lawfully or politically - instead the Labour Party kept schtum.

And, the two senior "nasties" who voiced this in public derived from immigrant parenthood.

The predicament of the NHS can never be addressed to everyone's content; the service has been hugely abused and taxpayers money squandered and infective; the ever enlarging number of users whose ailments are self-induced eg lifestyle (obesity), tradition (belief/genetic); etc.

The Rwanda scheme is just a start. I sincerely hope (will accept a higher rate of tax) more of the same schemes negotiated with other countries esp countries where most of the illegal entrants have come from; EU and France are non-starter as they've adopted a "not in my backyard syndrome" and punishment for Brexit. The chief beneficiaries of EU funds eg Poland, Bulgaria, Czech Rep, Romania and even Luxembourg are the worst "friendly" to acceptance of illegal refugees.

There are two sides to the Gaza conflict nevertheless, my main priority is to the indiscriminate killings of the innocent Gazan children women and the elderly; Sunak is going thro the motion, similarly President Biden and President Macron and german Chancellor - they all have political and commercial interests.

Notwithstanding, Sir Starmer did absolutely nothing concrete but "going thro' the motion" ie playing politics and cultivating political "friendship" for the future, and not rocked the applecart.

The above politicians are all guilty of assisting the murder of innocent Gazans by doing little or nothing.

Rwanda deportation scheme cost £700m and saw just four volunteers sent to Africa, Home Secretary reveals
22 July 2024, 16:03 | Updated: 22 July 2024, 18:42



Yvette Cooper branded the huge cost the “most shocking waste of taxpayer money I have ever seen” as she claimed the previous government had planned to spend more than £10billion on the scheme in total.

She told MPs: “I have been shocked by what I have found”, Ms Cooper told the Commons.

"Two years after the previous Government launched it, I can report it has already cost the British taxpayer £700million, in order to send just four volunteers [to Rwanda].

"Those costs include £290million payments to Rwanda, chartering flights that never took off, detaining hundreds of people and then releasing them, and paying for more than a thousand civil servants to work on the scheme.

OCD