By:
Looking forward to Brand sueing all of T-H-E-M for defamation and really getting justice, light and truth in court.
|
By:
This will be the one that destroys them though leif
Because hes never once denied being a womaniser, and women have been seen happily jumping into his car in public ffs This is the one that will finish the lying bast@rds, its so cringe theyve even gone after Brand, I mean the bloke has slept with more women its mental numbers I dont think theyve realised their mistake with this one, but once they do watch the media attempt to drop the story |
By:
Edybot first in
![]() #meToo#HimAlways |
By:
Edy
Trust me.. Brand is the wrong type to go after for this nonsense He can easily get young women into his bed hes charismatic and good looking, hes got it when it comes to women Trying to frame him for rape is embarrassing on their part, its pure desperation and even the public will not buy a word of it He use to have young women hanging of him on that big brother show he did back in the day, theyd be in awe of it, he didnt need to rape ![]() |
By:
As I said, I look forward to Brand pursueing them in court to bring truth and justice. Heck, I'd donate towards it and so should all us other truth seekers.
|
By:
I bet hes had married women as well
Hes defiantly not short of offers is Brand just look at his youtube channel |
By:
The days when you could be a babe magnet[hetro] and 'sleep' with them as fast as they could throw themselves under you were tales that made the front of vogue or got you prime time interviews and were accepted as cultural norms.
fast forward to the BS Wokery... to the weaponisation of behaviours used to cancel anyone prepared to raise their bonce above the parapet and ask thought provoking questions in a very intelligent and prescient manner. that Neil Oliver will be next. he's on the cusp of spitting out what he really wants to say ![]() |
By:
As we are all very much anti-grooming, we need the truth to be established beyond some newspaper articles and Brand should really look forward to owning the media on this and destroying them.
|
By:
in court.
|
By:
Am rather disappointed how low Brand's video view count is in respect to his amount of subscribers. The subscribers of the spiritual messiah of the awakening wonders seem rather uncommitted.
Girl with the Dogs has a much better ratio of (video watch count)/subscribers. |
By:
Girl with the Dogs has a much better ratio of (video watch count)/subscribers.
Dirty bastard! |
By:
Hiding behind an imagined conspiracy will only work with the nutjobs.
. |
By:
Like possbly Russell Brand, Girl with the Dogs is a really enthusiastic groomer - although in her case in the fur care kind of meaning. She is not doing sexual things with the dogs (and occasionally cats and ducks). Wouldn't completely rule out the possibility of that being done by other in this thread mentioned promiscious YouTubers though.
|
By:
edy • September 16, 2023 8:34 PM BST
Like possbly Russell Brand, Girl with the Dogs is a really enthusiastic groomer - although in her case in the fur care kind of meaning. She is not doing sexual things with the dogs (and occasionally cats and ducks). Wouldn't completely rule out the possibility of that being done by other in this thread mentioned promiscious YouTubers though. Arguably one of the most insanely contrived posts ever composed on here . What kind of individual has the mindset to write such nonsensical drivel and then think it worthy of hitting 'post reply' ? ![]() |
By:
Would you be kind enough to explain what you find so "insanely contrived" in particular? Help me improve my ways by being more specific.
|
By:
Reynard
that sounds like some cryptic deviance spouted by Edybot? |
By:
Russell Brand told Jimmy Savile he would bring along a naked female personal assistant who would give him a massage when they met.
Have a listen ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12526191/Russell-Brand-Jimmy-Savile-naked-female-assistant.html |
By:
Are those sentences really that cryptic?
|
By:
edy • September 16, 2023 8:44 PM BST
Would you be kind enough to explain what you find so "insanely contrived" in particular? Help me improve my ways by being more specific. Avoiding references to bestiality would probably be a good starting point (assuming you wish to be taken seriously) Unless bestiality is one of your preferred reference points ![]() |
By:
Well, Reynard, that reference is in reply to Shrewd_dude's post, which read:
Shrewd_dude • September 16, 2023 8:20 PM BST Girl with the Dogs has a much better ratio of (video watch count)/subscribers. Dirty bastard! Do you reckon I misread his post and his "Dirty bastard" was not a sneaky reference about bestiality? If so, what do you personally think he was trying to be funny about? |
By:
how the fcuk is this on tv instead of a police station
|
By:
For what other thing do you, Reynard, reckon "Dirty bastard" is an appropriate reply to in regards to my initial remark of her simply having a better view count per subscriber?
|
By:
I don't like the way he uses the word "paradigm" so prolifically, it screams of multiple wrongdoing and serial robe intrusion.
|
By:
edy • September 16, 2023 9:01 PM BST
For what other thing do you, Reynard, reckon "Dirty bastard" is an appropriate reply to in regards to my initial remark of her simply having a better view count per subscriber? I'll send you a larger shovel if you wish .......... ![]() |
By:
oh no a huge painting
|
By:
I do wish, yes. Please give me your hard thought of answer instead of squirming in the face of your mistake.
|
By:
Like a shift lifter?
|
By:
well this is clearly a bag of shoite
|
By:
What do you, Reynard, think Shrewd_dude was alluding to with his "Dirty bastard"? C'mon, mate, tell me.
|
By:
Ah , I see you've already acquired one
![]() |
By:
Still not going tell me? Sad. So sad.
|
By:
Sh@gger of the Year ....lol
|
By:
Is there a particular reason you so ardently refuse to answer, Reynard?
|
By:
3 years running
|
By:
more shocked if he said he was a virgin
|
By:
Helen needs all kinds of help, her mechanism has blown.
|
By:
Comes across as a big headed tw@t ... but I reckon most people in the media are the same
|
By:
Helen, stop it! Get off the telly!
|
By:
edy • September 16, 2023 9:16 PM BST
Is there a particular reason you so ardently refuse to answer, Reynard? Yes . I'm perfectly happy watching someone digging a hole providing they possess the necessary skill sets . I don't feel any inclination to assist somebody who clearly doesn't require my assistance . |