By:
This reminded me of the German wikipedia having the most German explanation on adrenochrome ever.
Adrenochrom ist zudem Bestandteil einer Reihe zeitgenössischer Verschwörungstheorien wie Pizzagate von 4chan und QAnon. Diese Theorien behaupten die Existenz unterirdischer Lager, in denen Kindern die vermeintlich verjüngende Substanz abgezapft werde, vergleichbar mit altertümlichen Ritualmordlegenden. Da sich das Stoffwechselprodukt jedoch leicht durch die Oxidation von Adrenalin gewinnen lässt, wäre eine Extraktion aus dem menschlichen Körper unwirtschaftlich.[8][9][10] Adrenochrome is furthermore part of several modern conspiracy theories from 4chan and QAnon. These theories allege the existence of underground camps in which the allegedly rejuvenating substance is being harvested from children, comparable to old-age ritual murder legends. Since the metabolite can be easily won through the oxidisation of adrenaline, the extraction from human bodies would be inefficient/uneconomical" [from a cost/use perspective] Whoever, as usual efficiency and cost obsessed German, wrote that is completely missing the point that the satanic cabal does not primarily care about those things. They greatly care about the whole ritual harvest deal. |
By:
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adrenochrom
|
By:
Surely you don't source your information from wikipedia ?
However I know that some people are desperately trying to politically smear the film. Which obviously makes it interesting. Another framing is that it's a faith based film. As if there isn't a faith that promotes the protection of children, in the strongest terms. Hopefully we will get to make our own judgement. |
By:
What precisely do you condemn about reading the wikipedia article on adenochrome?
|
By:
adrenochrome
|
By:
Personally I have a policy of ignoring wikipedia completely. Even tho it is spammed so heavily in browser searches.
|
By:
But why? What is wrong with reading wikipedia articles on chemical compounds like that for some basic information?
|
By:
And what is your go to place for such things instead? The Encyclopaedia Britannica has no article on it.
|
By:
I told you, I dismiss it as a rule. There may be some genuine content there, and equally some completely twisted content. I have no inclination to try and establish which the thing I'm looking at is.
|
By:
What's some completely twisted content?
|
By:
And what's there to twist with chemical formulas and such? Aaaaaaaaaaaand, what's your go to place for basic chemistry?
|
By:
The Pied Piper of Hamelin ( German:der Rattenfanger von Hameln )
is a legend from the town of Hameln Lower Saxony, Germany The legend dates back to the Middle Ages and references a rat catcher who when the citizens refused to pay for his services as promised he retaliates by leading the children away. Wiki |
By:
That is indeed a German legend well summed up in a few brief sentences by Wikipedia.
|
By:
I still remember vividly as a class in primary school , no older than 7
reading that story as if it was yesterday |
By:
Though .... did you actually retype/rephrase that from Wikipedia instead of copying it? Or why is there e.g. no Umlaut in Rattenfänger?
|
By:
We Germans are very precious about our umlauts. Please do not make us read umlaut-words in which the umlauts were removed.
|
By:
Not debating wikipedia, it is by definition edited by anonymous random individuals. I'm sure some of it is reliable, and some of it not. I know in my uni course that we were not allowed to cite wikipedia in submissions. As it was too unreliable.
|
By:
Cider • July 18, 2023 9:14 PM BST
Not debating wikipedia, Why not? |
By:
Scared of showing your cranky side if you highlight "completely twisted content" that is only completely twisted for severely cranky people?
|
By:
ä
|
By:
That's the weird part with high status people. Sometimes completely open with showing off just how big of a crank they are, but deep down their high status urges also makes them embarrassed about it at times.
|
By:
The thread is about the movie in the title (or more accurately the reaction, as we don't yet have the opportunity to watch it at the cinema).
|
By:
Ok, you wrote "Causing a bit of a stir (ie upsetting the right people)."
What are your top five favourite right upset people? |
By:
Apparently, this movie is causing the air conditioning to mysteriously break down in AMC cinemas, and also fire drill evacuations mid-way through the showing. I wonder why...?
|
By:
Yeah, why?
|
By:
Pop the phrase into a browser search and see the top results of the 'news' tab should do it.
This is the top entry on google Bloomberg QAnon and ‘Sound of Freedom’ Both Rely on Tired Hollywood Tropes Sex trafficking movies routinely skip over some very important questions, which gives the conspiratorial right room to run wild. Yes. Bizarre. |
By:
What's wrong with that item?
|
By:
It's almost as if certain people don't want the public to view the film. Can't think why a film that highlights the sex trafficking of children would elicit such a response.
|
By:
It wouldn't surprise me if the establishment blocks it getting a licence over here. I've not looked into it, but seems quite strange indeed that it has no release date.
|
By:
Are any of these stories ever true ?
apart from the pied piper of Hamelin from the Middle Ages |
By:
Wouldn't it be lots easier to simply not show the movies instead of showing it in quite a few cinemas only to then have the air conditioning break down?
|
By:
What's wrong with that item?
What are your top five favourite right upset people? For my sins I've had to watch Bloomberg output on tv for my trading on the odd occasion. Let's just say it lilts in a liberalist direction! You can do the rest of the work yourself. But as Get me a drink has noted, some people appear to be very upset about this movie, and it seems it may well be being sabotaged. |
By:
It all makes me wonder where these children are trafficked to. Or rather, who they are trafficked to. I can only hope this film has some answers.
|
By:
|
By:
In the light of the above. Would it be very rude of me to take
Cider • July 11, 2023 8:16 PM BST Doesn't comply with the woke mantra, essentially. Left wing, liberalist, marxist, however you want to label them go for the person and not their arguments or positions. It's far easier therefore to make people predetermine him as the devil incarnate, they then don't have to listen to what he says. Most people probably think the JK Rowling is anti trans for example. Without knowing anything she has said or done about the topic. and change a few words to make it Cider • July 11, 2023 8:16 PM BST Doesn't comply with the woke mantra, essentially. Left wing, liberalist, marxist, however you want to label them go for the publication and not their arguments or positions. It's far easier therefore to make people predetermine [the website] as the devil incarnate, they then don't have to listen to what [they write]. Most people probably think [Bloomberg lilts in a liberalist direction]. Without [really having read all too much from them or in particular that specific journalist] to, in a very funny way, question if you could potentially be a bit hypocritical at times? Or is this something totally entirely different? |
By:
No. I said that the film is upsetting the right people. It's called sarcasm. I'm sure that anyone aged over 11 knows what it means.
It's hella weird that media beats are smearing a film that is seemingly based on a true story about children being saved from child traffickers. |
By:
But as Get me a drink has noted, some people appear to be very upset about this movie, and it seems it may well be being sabotaged.
To you too: edy • July 18, 2023 9:31 PM BST Wouldn't it be lots easier to simply not show the movies instead of showing it in quite a few cinemas only to then have the air conditioning break down? |
By:
Yes well the part I quoted from Bloomberg is not a review of the movie or the content is it. It's a transparent smear.
And to return to the central theme. It is really interesting that the movie is being flooded with smears from the 'right' people. One would have though, a portrayal of kids being saved from being trafficked is something that everyone could (and should) get behind....Especially as the film has took off in popularity in an organic way. We will probably be told by the same people that Barbie is amazing :) |
By:
Furthermore, if T-H-E-Y wanted it buried, why did Disney not simply keep the rights? There is zero need or obligation for a company like Disney to give up the right.
Or if Disney are not part of T-H-E-M, why didn't T-H-E-Y buy the rights from Disney? Cider • July 18, 2023 9:48 PM BST Yes well the part I quoted from Bloomberg is not a review of the movie or the content is it. It's a transparent smear. What part of the item itself do you view as most smearing? |