Here come the Johnson party season whilst folk died alone photos

I suspect people are really full of rage because they fell for the lot while the rule makers didn't. No one likes being mugged.

Of course you will still get right-whingers saying it wasn't a party and Doris didn't lie. They're as deranged as he is. He has to go for the good of the country.

Looks pretty much like Starmer's party to me.

Perhaps it would to you. There's a huge difference, check it out.

I think Starmer's got serious questions to answer now

About what?

As usual the OP doesnt have a scooby...............

Restrictions on gatherings

Part 3 of the Regulations contains the new restrictions on gatherings.

Restrictions on indoor and outdoor gatherings

Indoor gatherings of two or more people are prohibited, unless an exception applies.

Outdoor gatherings (including in a private garden) of two or more people are prohibited, unless an exception applies. However, not more than two people can gather in a public outdoor space, such as a park or the countryside.

Not more than one carer for a person with a disability who needs continuous care and (any number of) children under five do not count when calculating how many people are gathering outdoors.

Restrictions on organising gatherings of more than 30 people

Organising or facilitating a gathering of more than 30 people taking place in private dwellings, on vessels or in a public outdoor place are prohibited. Gatherings in public outdoor places which are operated by a business or a charitable or philanthropic institution or a public body, are permitted. Gatherings organised by a business, a charitable or philanthropic institution, a public body or a political body are permitted if required precautions have been taken.

Organising or facilitating indoor rave-type gatherings of more than 30 people is not permitted.


Exceptions to the restrictions on gatherings
The exceptions to the restrictions on both indoor and outdoor gatherings and to organising gatherings of more than 30 people include:
Same or linked households. The restrictions do not apply where all the people gathering are in the same household or are members of two linked households.
Gatherings necessary for certain purposes. The restrictions do not apply to gatherings reasonably necessary for work..............,

Tiger
I take it you're talking about Starmer not Doris.

Doris' do was a party, a piss up, and not necessary for work.

May 23, 2022 -- 6:01PM, akabula wrote:

Doris' do was a party, a piss up, and not necessary for work.It wasn't a party. It wasn't a piss up. And he was working.You made 3 points and were wrong on all 3 counts.Excelling yerself here Charlie.

Stop talking bollocks. It was a piss up.

The half wits coming out with remarkle excuses
for Johnson having no knowledge that he attended parties
in his own home whilst people died alone, obeying
the laws Johnson made, Johnson broke, and johnson
lied to Parliament about breaking.

Hey, they are Tories, except akabula who said
he is not a tory.

Crippens hates the tories on here

Remarkable

Repeat the lie enough and dumb people will believe it!

He is gawn

The LIAR is a liability. Tories will do him.

Catherine West mp


The photo released today shows beyond any doubt that the Prime Minister lied to me and to the House.

I pressed him about whether he inadvertently misled the House in January - he didn't answer. Now we know why

Shameful

https://t.co/7MlTI501sr

..

Big problem for Johnson imo. I think the pictures show him breaking the rules (no problem if you're diametrically opposed to my opinion on that). Parliament goes into recess later this week, all his MP's now have to go back to their constituencies to face their constituents & put a positive spin on it - and not all of them will see it as a work event.

Well Charlie has certainly swallowed it WD.

Good law project



We have now had advice from our QC and junior. We will be sending a further judicial review pre-action protocol letter to the Met in relation to the apparent failures in its investigation into the Prime Minister later this week.

'I think that the Met may not have investigated this as thoroughly as they could have done because they didn't want to upset Number 10.'

Ex-Met Deputy Assistant Commissioner @brianpaddick speaks to LBC as Westminster waits for the Sue Gray report to be released.

A reminder that the Met refused to investigate Johnson's criminality - until @GoodLawProject sued them. And then they changed their minds.

BBC now updated it to headline story - what kept you?

Police are now under investigation

Boris is the best MP that Labour have.

Patsy stevenson


Of course the Met didn’t do anything
, he’s not a small woman at a vigil

. #partygate

Its desperate stuff at this point

Its as if their begging the flock to kick off at this point,

“Please riot, please for fooks sake” said in a desperate plea

15 nov 2020

2 days after the party at Downing Street...

Johnson on twitter


Today I was notified by NHS Test and Trace that I must self-isolate as I have been in contact with someone who tested positive for COVID-19.

I have no symptoms, but am following the rules and will be working from No10 as I continue to lead the government’s pandemic response.

So did he break the rules or not?

Looks like Stringfellows but Johnson didn't think it was a party

ffs

NEW:

Conservative MP, Sir Roger Gale has called for Boris Johnson to resign.

Pippa Crerar
@PippaCrerar
·
2h
Tory MP Roger Gale tells Times Radio PM should quit over "damning" new pics.

"It's absolutely clear there was a party, that he attended it, that he was raising a toast to glass one of his colleagues. Therefore, he misled us from the despatch box. Honorably there is one answer".

Seems clear to me.

Doesn't take it forward though. He's already submitted his letter

If he goes, they should all go simple. I'd bet (and yes I do) that less than 10% of the country didn't break lockdown rules. I've said before it's just cheap point scoring. Move on to what matters.

Boris made the rules and he broke them. As he is currently PM, what options does he have?

If he knowingly did he has no option. Same for Keir. Next election interesting.

Nothing at all to do with Starmer. He has made his position perfectly clear.

Everything to do with Starmer. All looks the same to me and I'm not bothered about fines and all that. We all know the score.

The former leader of the Scottish Conservatives, Ruth Davidson, said the prime minister's position was untenable.

May 23, 2022 -- 9:47PM, HallGreenSpy wrote:

Everything to do with Starmer. All looks the same to me and I'm not bothered about fines and all that. We all know the score.

Starmer has made his position clear to everyone. What more do you want him to do?

Ruth for PM !

She wouldn't stand for any of the current nonsense within the Conservative party.

As clear as mud. We all know it's akin to what the tories done. He's hoping or knowing that a different constabulary treats these things different. As I've said, it's KNOWINGLY that you have done wrong.

I quite like Ruth tbf.

The difference of course is that Starmer is a man of honour and will resign if fined.

when is the boris johnson report due ?

And if he does, Boris will be in a very difficult position. But here's the rub. Does Keir know he won't be fined? Summat don't sit pretty with this falling on the sword bollox and most people can see through this sort of thing. If wrong, I'll gladly hold my hands up.

Report due after PMQ's (so he can then slink off during the recess)

Soon morp. Hope you are well.

NEW:

The Times has been told that Boris Johnson secretly met up with Sue Gray earlier this month and he suggested that she does not publish her report.

He is said to have asked her if there was much point in publishing it given that ‘it’s all out there’.

Would that timeline tie in with all the talk of civil services cuts? Smell of a bit of the Channel 4 off it.

Peston

Important additional detail about @itvnews scoop pictures of the PM drinking at Nov 2020 leaving do for his director of comms: the police have fined some who were at the party. It was therefore an illegal party. No explanation from Met about why they didn’t fine @BorisJohnson

I am baffled by that one too.

Paul Mason

I just looked at my phone Photos for November 2020 ... at no stage do any of them look like this. Try it with your photos... if you can find a party with raised glasses you probably were a Tory politician or SPAD .. that's how bad it is

There is no evidence - so far - that Boris had a drink ( and we know he didn’t eat any cake he had a salad )

But we do know for a fact that Sir Kier was boozing and having curry and pizza along with Ms Rayner and others

Strange that Paul Mason seems to forget that

There is no evidence - so far - that Boris had a drink ( and we know he didn’t eat any cake he had a salad )

Julia Hartley brewer


There WERE parties at No10.
The PM knew because he was AT them.
The guidance and rules were NOT followed at ANY time.

The PM knew this.
He lied to Parliament.
He lied to us.

He locked us in our homes while he drank at parties.

If you're ok with that, fine.
I'm not. #Partygate

Emma kennedy



Look. We all know he’s lying. Literally everyone knows he’s lying, even people pretending they don’t. So please, let’s not have a gazillion columns on why he didn’t get fined. He  lied. It’s bullsh1t he got away with it. He has to go.

Steve Baker mp

https://twitter.com/SteveBakerHW/status/1528779027472863233?s=19

..

^ not sure who those people are

It’s an interesting question - what constitutes a party ?

Is it a group of people drinking and having something to eat ?

The obvious and honest answer to that is - No

Emma kennedy



Look. We all know he’s lying. Literally everyone knows he’s lying, even people pretending they don’t. So please, let’s not have a gazillion columns on why he didn’t get fined. He  lied. It’s bullsh1t he got away with it. He has to go.

As long as Ms Kennedy also remembers  Starmers and Rayners party

And why sir Kier and Ms Rayner lied

What a bout....

He is the immovable object hes going neywhere

Everyone is brainwashed and conditioned to vote for liars....

I thought everybody knew that.

They were clearly all at it, Bozo, Kier, the lot of them. Either sack them all or try and get on and fix this broken country, imo of course!

Sir Roger Gale MP
@SirRogerGale
· 9m
I believe that the PM has misled the HoC’s from the despatch box. That is a resignation issue. I have made my own position clear. It is now a matter for my Conservative parliamentary colleagues to decide whether or not to instigate a vote of no confidence.

Further to Boris receiving Sue Gray's report could he then "correct the record" to amend the historical comments he made at the despatch box?

Starmer and Boris both appear to be of the opinion that Covid was dangerous for more than six people meeting outside but safe for over a dozen to meet up indoors for a drinking session just because they claim it was 'reasonably necessary for work'.

The virus cannot tell if people are working. If masks and social distancing and number limits are needed for socialising they should also be needed for work.

Starmer and Boris broke the spirit of the 'all in it together' social contract by using these 'reasonably necessary for work' loopholes for their drinking sessions.

Next time they try and lock us down remember their actions not their legal speak words.

Their actions demonstrate that they did not fear the virus they tried to make us terrified of.

----you-have-to-laugh--- 24 May 22 00:50 
What a bout....

...........................

A tedious way of avoiding condemnation of Labour leaders doing the same thing.

Pathetic Whataboutery from the frog

Does he think Johnson should resign for lying to Parliament of not?

What has Starmer gif tk do with Doris lying to the House of Commons frog?

Honours degree in whataboutery for Insider Frog.

it's no longer about the parties - it's about what lies Johnson may have been told and to whom.

*Johnson may have told

But what about Starmer's lies (couldn't resist)

They are all dodgy. All drinking in groups indoors claiming it is 'necessary for work'.

So far for all these photos there has been 1 fine for Boris. 1 fine for Sunak. This latest picture did not even get a fine! Starmer may not even get a fine. Rayner may not even get a fine. Foy may not even get a fine. We can all see the pictures and make up our minds.

I have made up mine. The people that voted through the laws on us stretched them to the limits themselves claiming it was 'work'.

It is shameful by the lot of them to all claim 'no rules were broken' and 'there was no party' etc.

Do they really think the public do not have eyes?

I have eyes, also ears.

"No, but I am sure that whatever happened, the guidance was followed and the rules were followed at all times."

Absolutely of course they were Doris wouldn’t lie. He is a fine fellow who organised a plane out of Afghanistan for pets and let brave people who risked their lives for OUR soldiers to die! Jolly decent chap what what!

BBC dead cat still showing resolution (there early morning, still holding up).

Peter Bone ,Sky news,Newsnight should be getting overtime,rinse and repeat,managed to get in illegal immigrants and cost of living. Worthy topics maybe but it is in relation to partygate, a look over there,not applicable.

The 75 year old stallholder (always voted Conservative) who was on a few minutes earlier was a beauty. I called "bingo" about 6 times

Paul brand



Responding to government denials this morning one source who was at the leaving party tells me:

1. The PM orchestrated the event

2. He encouraged people to fill their glasses after a tense day

3. He gave a speech and chatted to everyone for 20mins or so

No10 dispute all this.

Lee Ho Fooks 23 May 22 22:04

Report due after PMQ's (so he can then slink off during the recess)


Report just arrived - it will take No 10 a couple of hours to check it so that will fit in with "after PMQ's"

“I commissioned this report to set the record straight and allow us all to move on.  I accept full responsibility for my failings.  I am humbled by the whole experience.  We have learned our lesson.”

Boris is going nowhere!!

Hopefully you are correct say the Labour Party.

I see one of the cleaners that was clearing their sh1t and mess up died of covid,told to keep coming into work another was sacked because he was self isolating,they were even killing plebs at work they should be locke up the lot of them..vermin.

'At Walthamstow Coroner’s Court Gomes’s death was officially recorded as hypertension of the heart.'

Don't let the truth get in the way of a poisonous political rant.

There were no covid outbreaks at the ministry of justice offices

more lies from giggli

Doubtless the usual suspects like giggli will the first to say that Boris tells untruths

They’re like that , hypocrites

I see one of the cleaners that was clearing their sh1t and mess up died of covid,told to keep coming into work another was sacked because he was self isolating,they were even killing plebs at work they should be locke up the lot of them..vermin

X2

Rory Stewart
@RoryStewartUK
·
4h
The fact that it has had to be said repeatedly over so many incidents over so much time - does not change the fundamental truth:
Boris Johnson is manifestly unsuitable to be Prime- minister. Every day he remains further damages the country.

NEW: Boris Johnson's official spokesman apologises for repeatedly making false statements about Partygate for last six months.

"The PM has apologised for that and I'm happy to apologise for that as well".

But wouldn't comment on any disciplinary action which might follow.

https://twitter.com/Tobias_Ellwood
.

'If you're holding someone in your basement, it's smart to
starve them for a bit. Saves money. But they might start
misbehaving if they hear you partying upstairs. So if it
looks like they're about to turn on you, toss them some
scraps, so they see you as a hero.'

- Tory Handbook

----you-have-to-laugh--- 26 May 22 12:04 
I see one of the cleaners that was clearing their sh1t and mess up died of covid,told to keep coming into work another was sacked because he was self isolating

-----------------------------------------------------

  !! -  Not doubting you, assume its sourced.  Working at the moment so haven't time to check myself.  But if this is true - this is a real tipping point.

If true, expect this to 'grow legs' its too grotesque an image. As I said, and not doubting you personally - I find this hard to believe.

If even partially true, related or not related to the parties - its the sickening contrast and visualisation of it that will be in forefront of people's mind. Defending it becomes increasingly detrimental to those wheeled out to do so.

'At Walthamstow Coroner’s Court Gomes’s death was officially recorded as hypertension of the heart.'

Seems not true.

Worked at Ministry of Justice, and initial COVID verdict was reversed by post-Mortem.  (Nick Robinson BBC - has corrected).

As I said, if it was true then it was probably the tipping point and final nail.

People keen to attribute all deaths to covid for two years and they're still at it, pathetic.

Don’t worry he’ll be back again somewhere with more horse manure
he’s completely impervious

BBC lies and certain types lap it straight up.

* not a ref to yhtl