Politics
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
23 May 22
16:18
Joined:
Date Joined:
06 Jul 10
EXCL: @ITVNews has obtained pictures of Boris Johnson drinking at a No10 party during lockdown in November 2020.
The photos cast fresh doubt on the PM's repeated claims he was unaware of rule-breaking in No10 during the pandemic.
See images here:
https://t.co/sUJiWpxqmm
https://t.co/iXopuPIQu7
...
The photos cast fresh doubt on the PM's repeated claims he was unaware of rule-breaking in No10 during the pandemic.
See images here:
https://t.co/sUJiWpxqmm
https://t.co/iXopuPIQu7
...
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 113
|
By:
Just another 290 photos to go.
No rules were broken... |
|
By:
At the time of the photos only 2 people were allowed to meet indoors - it was the second full lockdown.
Boris Johnson told Parliament on 1st Dec 2021, "all guidance was followed completely in No 10." Questions now are: 1) did he mislead MPs? 2) Why didn't police fine him? |
|
By:
We don't know for certain whether or not police and Sue Gray had these pictures of what one source has dubbed 'fizzgate'.
In theory we find out re Sue Gray this week. We have asked Met to clarify, but they have given little comment on the detail of their investigation thus far. |
|
By:
Another vile thread. Using the deaths of people to score a cheap political point.
|
|
By:
The gin bottle is empty
Carrie Antoinette must have been there |
|
By:
Seeing the empty glasses on the side, you can tell there are or were other people at this event. The wine bottles on the side are empty or partially drunk so this is not a 10 minute drink. This event went on for some time.
|
|
By:
seems clear now if it ever wasn't that johnson hasn't spoken a word of truth about this matter. who could have predicted that?
|
|
By:
Here he is, being asked about this party in hoc
https://twitter.com/BBCPolitics/status/1468563160827568130?s=19 .. |
|
By:
Looks like Stringfellows but Johnson didn't think it was a party
 |
|
By:
More whataboutery. He was obviously testing a potential cure for covid
|
|
By:
https://twitter.com/coldwarsteve/status/1528766099289948160?s=19
.. |
|
By:
The good old Beeb don't think it deserves to push the Nazanin Zaghari story off top spot (maybe it is just a non-story)
|
|
By:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_QR9QP0Rjsc
|
|
By:
I suspect people are really full of rage because they fell for the lot while the rule makers didn't. No one likes being mugged.
|
|
By:
Of course you will still get right-whingers saying it wasn't a party and Doris didn't lie. They're as deranged as he is. He has to go for the good of the country.
|
|
By:
Looks pretty much like Starmer's party to me.
|
|
By:
Perhaps it would to you. There's a huge difference, check it out.
|
|
By:
I think Starmer's got serious questions to answer now
|
|
By:
About what?
|
|
By:
As usual the OP doesnt have a scooby...............
Restrictions on gatherings Part 3 of the Regulations contains the new restrictions on gatherings. Restrictions on indoor and outdoor gatherings Indoor gatherings of two or more people are prohibited, unless an exception applies. Outdoor gatherings (including in a private garden) of two or more people are prohibited, unless an exception applies. However, not more than two people can gather in a public outdoor space, such as a park or the countryside. Not more than one carer for a person with a disability who needs continuous care and (any number of) children under five do not count when calculating how many people are gathering outdoors. Restrictions on organising gatherings of more than 30 people Organising or facilitating a gathering of more than 30 people taking place in private dwellings, on vessels or in a public outdoor place are prohibited. Gatherings in public outdoor places which are operated by a business or a charitable or philanthropic institution or a public body, are permitted. Gatherings organised by a business, a charitable or philanthropic institution, a public body or a political body are permitted if required precautions have been taken. Organising or facilitating indoor rave-type gatherings of more than 30 people is not permitted. Exceptions to the restrictions on gatherings The exceptions to the restrictions on both indoor and outdoor gatherings and to organising gatherings of more than 30 people include: Same or linked households. The restrictions do not apply where all the people gathering are in the same household or are members of two linked households. Gatherings necessary for certain purposes. The restrictions do not apply to gatherings reasonably necessary for work.............., |
|
By:
Tiger
I take it you're talking about Starmer not Doris. Doris' do was a party, a piss up, and not necessary for work. |
|
By:
|
|
By:
The half wits coming out with remarkle excuses
for Johnson having no knowledge that he attended parties in his own home whilst people died alone, obeying the laws Johnson made, Johnson broke, and johnson lied to Parliament about breaking. Hey, they are Tories, except akabula who said he is not a tory. Crippens hates the tories on here |
|
By:
Remarkable
|
|
By:
Repeat the lie enough and dumb people will believe it!
He is gawn The LIAR is a liability. Tories will do him. |
|
By:
Catherine West mp
The photo released today shows beyond any doubt that the Prime Minister lied to me and to the House. I pressed him about whether he inadvertently misled the House in January - he didn't answer. Now we know why Shameful https://t.co/7MlTI501sr .. |
|
By:
Big problem for Johnson imo. I think the pictures show him breaking the rules (no problem if you're diametrically opposed to my opinion on that). Parliament goes into recess later this week, all his MP's now have to go back to their constituencies to face their constituents & put a positive spin on it - and not all of them will see it as a work event.
|
|
By:
Well Charlie has certainly swallowed it WD.
|
|
By:
Good law project
We have now had advice from our QC and junior. We will be sending a further judicial review pre-action protocol letter to the Met in relation to the apparent failures in its investigation into the Prime Minister later this week. |
|
By:
'I think that the Met may not have investigated this as thoroughly as they could have done because they didn't want to upset Number 10.'
Ex-Met Deputy Assistant Commissioner @brianpaddick speaks to LBC as Westminster waits for the Sue Gray report to be released. |
|
By:
A reminder that the Met refused to investigate Johnson's criminality - until @GoodLawProject sued them. And then they changed their minds.
|
|
By:
BBC now updated it to headline story - what kept you?
|
|
By:
Police are now under investigation
|
|
By:
Boris is the best MP that Labour have.
|
|
By:
Patsy stevenson
Of course the Met didn’t do anything , he’s not a small woman at a vigil . #partygate |
|
By:
Its desperate stuff at this point
Its as if their begging the flock to kick off at this point, “Please riot, please for fooks sake” said in a desperate plea |
|
By:
15 nov 2020
2 days after the party at Downing Street... Johnson on twitter Today I was notified by NHS Test and Trace that I must self-isolate as I have been in contact with someone who tested positive for COVID-19. I have no symptoms, but am following the rules and will be working from No10 as I continue to lead the government’s pandemic response. |
|
By:
So did he break the rules or not?
|
|
By:
Looks like Stringfellows but Johnson didn't think it was a party
ffs |