May 17, 2022 -- 7:16PM, jollyswagman wrote:
A T the inference in what you say is pretty clear to me (maybe not to scott), you dont have to name someone to libel them. this is just another example of the kind of thing that could get the forum closed. the person is entitled to a presumption of innocence.
Come on now jolly, it won't be too difficult to narrow it down to male tory MPs who were in their position at least some of the time between 2002 and 2009, in his fifties and will not be attending Parliament.
May 17, 2022 -- 7:29PM, jollyswagman wrote:
the papers arent saying who it is, for good reason. i know it is unlikely but there are people who scour social media looking for individuals to sue.
Pol pot might lose his Wendy houses
May 17, 2022 -- 8:22PM, casemoney wrote:
Liberal Cyril the Father of the Progressive movement
Qualify that statement please case, I know you can't but would like to see you try!
May 17, 2022 -- 8:29PM, politicspunter wrote:
Did he really? Never knew that.
At council level
May 19, 2022 -- 12:14AM, ----you-have-to-laugh--- wrote:
Might be the female ones are safe from this mp.
May 19, 2022 -- 7:27PM, salmon spray wrote:
According to "The Metro " the complainant is male.
Alleged rapist could be in the shyte.
May 21, 2022 -- 11:39PM, LoyalHoncho wrote:
Possibly but why should it if their case is bona-fide.