Politics
What happened to Ticker Carlson to make him think that broadcasting Russian bilge in support of the evil child murderer and killer of our citizens Putin is a neat idea who knows. Maybe he was dropped on his fat head when he was very young.
But the extreme right wing nutjobs, whether on this forum or on Fox News show their true colours by supporting Putin.
He's a combination of the News Presenter on the film "Network" and David Icke.
currently 75-100 if you wanna back or lay him
What was the Young Hunt being paid for when he was working in Ukraine , 60 Bags a month Not bad for a crack addict . Some kind of Gas Company , what type of gas were they dealing with because it must have been a shyte provider , There is no Gas
Pmsfl If the said company had anything to do with Gas it was Russian How much gas does the Ukraine supply to anyone ? So What was the Young Hunt doing in Ukraine ?
Tucker is a voice of reason in the stinking quagmire of American politics
Careful but then again at least I know you are taking the pith. Some of these loons ashley believe what you typed!
Fox News broadcast 2 separate editions of the obscene Tucker Carlson tonight which heavily pushed a conspiracy theory originating in Moscow that the USA was secretly operating biological weapons labs in Ukraine. Indeed Carlson’s sustained pro Russian anti Ukrainian rants have even been shown on Putin TV (Russia’s only TV station).
What happened to Ticker Carlson to make him think that broadcasting Russian bilge in support of the evil child murderer and killer of our citizens Putin is a neat idea who knows. Maybe he was dropped on his fat head when he was very young.
But the extreme right wing nutjobs, whether on this forum or on Fox News show their true colours by supporting Putin.
And because Tucker Carlson supports the evil mass murderer and fascist killer Putin, guess what the biggest supporter of the wicked mass murderer Putin says:
Tucker is a voice of reason in the stinking quagmire of American politics
Now would anyone with a shred of decency support an idiot like Tucker Carlson over his ranting support for the rapist Russian murders?
https://youtube.com/watch?v=LxGp7qN_YE4
Old cryer's wretched diatribe should see him in court for slander/defamation
ron was that price once food banks & child labour batteries
the new normal
Apr 13, 2022 -- 3:29PM, shiny new shoes please wrote:
110 ron was that price once food banks & child labour batteriesthe new normal
I see Warner Bros placating the mass murdering CCP SCUM AGAIN
They cut out a couple of gay references in the new Harry Potter film
Amazing how PRO LGBT&(*)^&%*%^&$^ they are in America
We support them... unless it upsets our Paymasters
These people are the worst, morally bankrupt genocidal supporting hypocritical SCUM
Judge Rules Tucker Carlson Is Not a Credible Source of News
Tucker the Untouchable’ goes soft on Putin but remains Fox News’s biggest power
Tucker Carlson's sexist rants reveal an ugly truth
Tucker Carlson Falsely Claims the COVID Vaccine Is Killing People (Video)
"This “general tenor” of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not “stating actual facts” about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in “exaggeration” and “non-literal commentary.” "
https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/7216968/9-24-20-McDougal-v-Fox-Opinion.pdf
Apr 13, 2022 -- 3:43PM, Charlie wrote:
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/09/judge-rules-fox-news-tucker-carlson-not-source-of-news-defamation-suit-mcdougal-trump.htmlJudge Rules Tucker Carlson Is Not a Credible Source of News
You are such a loser, it's not even enjoyable to rip you to pieces
Tucker's lwayers just used Rachel Madcow's defence to SAVE MONEY
https://timesofsandiego.com/business/2021/08/17/rachel-maddow-wins-in-9th-circuit-oan-loses-appeal-in-defamation-case/
“Maddow’s statement is well within the bounds of what qualifies as protected speech under the First Amendment. No reasonable viewer could conclude that Maddow implied an assertion of objective fact. The judgment of the district court is therefore affirmed.”
Very well done.
Apr 13, 2022 -- 4:02PM, A_T wrote:
Carlson's own lawyers used the defence he's not to be taken seriously
Stincky doesn't listen to sense.
Apr 13, 2022 -- 4:02PM, A_T wrote:
Carlson's own lawyers used the defence he's not to be taken seriously
Yes because Madcow used it first!!
Therefore a precedent has been set & lawyers use those to expedite a case
Dear me
Apr 13, 2022 -- 4:05PM, A_T wrote:
Sticky do you believe Carlson states the facts - because his own lawyers don't.
You don't understand the law, take a seat
Apr 13, 2022 -- 4:00PM, Stickywickets wrote:
Apr 13, 2022 -- 3:43PM, Charlie wrote:https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/09/judge-rules-fox-news-tucke... Rules Tucker Carlson Is Not a Credible Source of NewsYou are such a loser, it's not even enjoyable to rip you to piecesTucker's lwayers just used Rachel Madcow's defence to SAVE MONEYhttps://timesofsandiego.com/business/2021/08/17/rachel-maddow-wins-in-9... statement is well within the bounds of what qualifies as protected speech under the First Amendment. No reasonable viewer could conclude that Maddow implied an assertion of objective fact. The judgment of the district court is therefore affirmed.”
well that can't be right as the case you quote was well after the one charlie quotes.
they also don't come to anything like the same judgement or actually even offer the same defence.
Apr 13, 2022 -- 4:04PM, Stickywickets wrote:
Apr 13, 2022 -- 4:02PM, A_T wrote:Carlson's own lawyers used the defence he's not to be taken seriouslyYes because Madcow used it first!!Therefore a precedent has been set & lawyers use those to expedite a caseDear me
but the case you quote was well after the one charlie quotes
When a PRECEDENT has been set, the next set of lawyers don't remake the wheel ffs
They use case law & save the client money
Apr 13, 2022 -- 4:07PM, northanlite wrote:
Apr 13, 2022 -- 4:04PM, Stickywickets wrote:Apr 13, 2022 --
Apr 13, 2022 -- 4:12PM, Stickywickets wrote:
Well that's informative.
Apr 13, 2022 -- 4:19PM, Stickywickets wrote:
I'm not going to spoon feed it to you ffs,
The point of the rulings is that the talking head polemicist on Fox or MSNBC is presenting an opinion, and using hyperbole, sarcasm etc, and not reading out 'news'. And further, that everyone watching this stuff understands how it goes by now.
yes and so it's not Carlson's intention to be taken seriously
And people understand this, because there is no requirement on US TV for people to always be making literally true statements, or for their opinions to have been 'fact checked' in advance, or to always being impartial, when making political points.
Emily Maitlis got into trouble for thinking we had the same rules here.
Apr 13, 2022 -- 4:00PM, Stickywickets wrote:
Apr 13, 2022 -- 3:43PM, Charlie wrote:https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/09/judge-rules-fox-news-tucke... Rules Tucker Carlson Is Not a Credible Source of NewsYou are such a loser, it's not even enjoyable to rip you to piecesTucker's lwayers just used Rachel Madcow's defence to SAVE MONEYhttps://timesofsandiego.com/business/2021/08/17/rachel-maddow-wins-in-9... statement is well within the bounds of what qualifies as protected speech under the First Amendment. No reasonable viewer could conclude that Maddow implied an assertion of objective fact. The judgment of the district court is therefore affirmed.”
When were the Tucker and Maddow cases respectively?
https://youtube.com/watch?v=fSrtVEXxF40
Tucker: You just became a little more powerful.
TIP for forumites
One of the best ways to breech/bypass paywalls is to use the Way Back Machine especially for US sites Washington Post/New York Times.
ucker Carlson and his wife were looking to get their son a leg up in his college application to Georgetown University when they turned to a well-connected Washington friend who had an even better-connected father.
“I realize you don’t really know Buckley,” Susie Carlson wrote via email in 2014 to Hunter Biden, a Georgetown graduate and the son of the then-vice president. “Maybe you could meet or speak to him and he could send you a very brief resume with his interests and grades attached.”
Tucker Carlson offered that his son was a good squash player and an excellent fly fisherman. “He loves Washington for all the right reasons, I think,” Carlson added, “and really wants to go to school here.” When Biden agreed to write a letter of recommendation, Susie Carlson added a heap of praise: “Tucker and I have the greatest respect and admiration for you. Always!”
The Carlsons’ past entreaties to Biden may come as a surprise to many present-day viewers of “Tucker Carlson Tonight,” the highly rated, prime-time Fox News show on which the host has repeatedly ridiculed Biden for seeking to profit off his family connections and at times for his history of personal troubles and drug use.
The interactions reveal the extent to which Carlson was willing to turn on a former associate as he thrives in a hyperpartisan media world in which conservatives have made Biden a prime target for attack during his father’s presidency. They also show how Carlson once sought to benefit from the elite political circles in Washington that he now regularly rails against as the “ruling class.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/05/19/look-time-tucker-carlson-asked-hunter-biden-favor/
Though it shows that Hunter was widely seen as a guy who could make things happen for people. I wonder what connections Hunter had to be able to do that.
May 19, 2022 -- 7:51PM, tobermory wrote:
Not a good look for Tucker.Though it shows that Hunter was widely seen as a guy who could make things happen for people. I wonder what connections Hunter had to be able to do that.
tobermoron, concentrate on Tucker he's a big Trump fan and a proven liar.
May 19, 2022 -- 7:31PM, Cardinal Scott wrote:
Washington Post has a pesky paywallTIP for forumitesOne of the best ways to breech/bypass paywalls is to use the Way Back Machine especially for US sites Washington Post/New York Times.
Peasant
May 19, 2022 -- 8:35PM, Stickywickets wrote:
Not one of the lefturd stains has ever watched tucker Carlson lmfaoJust brain-dead sheep regurgitating smooth brain talking points
Good to see that you finally came to grips with being fat.
May 19, 2022 -- 8:37PM, Stickywickets wrote:
The contents of this post have been hidden for this blocked user.
[Manage blocked users]
I was aware of Tucker even before he worked at CNN when his trademark was a dickie bow tie.
That is why I know he's a fraud because he was moderate back then, what he is now is all an act, he is a professional controversialist.
