Dec 28, 2020 -- 4:04PM, politicspunter wrote:
frog1000, are you Insider Trader?
He should at least have the decency to vehemently deny it instead of being rude and always ignoring the question, shouldn't he?
Dec 28, 2020 -- 9:21PM, Fatslogger wrote:
On the OP, you really need to know what a health impact event includes. Given that fevers are very common after vaccination, a high proportion of them could be a day off work with a temperature and perhaps a Covid test to make sure it’s the vaccine doing it, not that the person was incubating Covid.
Less of the non-melodramatic posting please, Fatslogger.
Dec 28, 2020 -- 9:28PM, TimmyRiggins wrote:
Dec 28, 2020 -- 9:21PM, Fatslogger wrote:On the OP, you really need to know what a health impact event includes. Given that fevers are very common after vaccination, a high proportion of them could be a day off work with a temperature and perhaps a Covid test to make sure it’s the vaccine doing it, not that the person was incubating Covid.Less of the non-melodramatic posting please, Fatslogger.
Sorry, I do realise I’m unfashionable. I try to slag other posters off and get into the odd feud, at least. Sadly, Crips has gone somewhere.
Dec 28, 2020 -- 10:02PM, Fatslogger wrote:
Dec 28, 2020 -- 9:28PM, TimmyRiggins wrote:Dec 28, 2020 --
Dec 28, 2020 -- 10:02PM, Fatslogger wrote:
Dec 28, 2020 -- 9:28PM, TimmyRiggins wrote:Dec 28, 2020 --
Dec 28, 2020 -- 6:03PM, PorcupineorPineapple wrote:
Given schools are the ripest breeding grounds for the virus in recent months, does it not make sense to promote all teachers and teenagers to the front of the queue for the vaccine? Given you have hundreds of people in one place, it's also great logistically as you can simply send half a dozen nurses and have a school done in a couple of hours. Got to be better than the inevitable closing of schools for a month.I get the argument for vaccinating the vulnerable first but given the virus is currently rampaging, would it not be more beneficial to approach it from the other angle and stop the transmissions between young and healthy people, while the vulnerable hunker down for a little while longer?
27 kids aged 0-19 have died with a positive Covid 19 test within a 28 day period in English Hospitals EVER.
21 of those kids had a pre-existing condition.
Who in their right mind would inject millions of kids with a vaccine that has unknown effects on fertility and appears from the OP to have other side effects given the extremely low chance of any of them dying?
Dec 28, 2020 -- 10:17PM, TimmyRiggins wrote:
Not sure what's up with quoting... I soon realised what the >500 posts in the other thread were, when I asked if I had missed anything
There are two (at least) quoting bugs on the forum.
One is triggered if you try to quote a post that contains a double space. Like so. If you try to quote my post now, it will display up to "Like", cut off before the "so".
What happened to you though was the triple quote bug. I.e You posted Fatslogger (first quote, the one where you said he should be more melodramatic - 8:28), fatslogger then quoted you quoting him (2nd quote, 9:02). When you then tried to quote him quoting you quoting him, it triggered the triple quote bug.
Dec 28, 2020 -- 9:35PM, nineteen points wrote:
what responsible parent would let their children be vaccinated against something that doesnt affect them.especially prepubesant kids.
An insane one, is it even licensed for kids the vaccine for the terrifying covid?