Jun 26, 2022 -- 3:37PM, A_T wrote:
"pretty stark as to why it was so under-policed"razz please explain this statement you made
later man i have to go out, im sure you'll be glued to the screen waiting for my reply again
Jun 26, 2022 -- 3:40PM, ----you-have-to-laugh--- wrote:
Trump sent them there when he made his speech, inviting themto invade the Capitol.Are you a bit fick or on drugs?
Where did Trump tell people to break into the building? The people who breached the cordon and got in were not even at the rally. Seems pretty unlikely that Trump would think a mob could just push there way in, it was fairly incredible that there were like 10 officers vs 600 people.
Jun 26, 2022 -- 3:45PM, A_T wrote:
it was fairly incredible that there were like 10 officers vs 600 peopleyou think they should have expected that Trump supporters would break into the Capital building?
Muriel Bowser and Pelosi saw to that, do keep up ffs
Jun 26, 2022 -- 3:51PM, Timber wrote:
This should shut up the leftards
Jun 26, 2022 -- 3:58PM, A_T wrote:
I'm still confused as to why the authorities should have expected trump supporters would break into the Capitol
Ray Epps, in various videos verbally saying 'go to go into the capitol'
Not even been arrested
Jun 26, 2022 -- 4:06PM, A_T wrote:
tobermory I'm still confused as to why the authorities should have expected trump supporters would break into the Capitol
Surely you can't be that thick
The protest shouldn't have been able to get anywhere near
Jun 26, 2022 -- 3:44PM, A_T wrote:
in the meantime maybe someone can explain to me the total lack of adequate police presence and why they let the dumb protestors in?i've never claimed the above. you're the one who said it's "pretty stark as to why it was so under-policed"let's see if you can explain this statement without making an even bigger idiot of yourself that you have already
weird reply. i never claimed you did claim what i claimed.. i asked a question, and you for no reason at all say "i never claimed the above"
i'm asking why you think that's the case. unless you think there was adequate police there. idk how you expect me to explain my statement when it's self explanatory, I'll clarify yet again:
I don't think there was adequate police there considering the event was planned days in advance, trump was stoking the flames of claims of a **** election, right there that should of had police, the capitol security, intelligence agencies alarm bells ringing and providing ample security. instead a mostly peaceful bunch of idiots were let into the buildings by police with no explanation as to why and why there wasn't a significant police presence.
Jun 26, 2022 -- 3:53PM, A_T wrote:
Well if anyone should have anticipated it surely it was the police?but why would police have anticipated such a thing? it's never happened before
because it's their ****g job you lemon the protest was planned smh, how on earth would they fail to connect the dots on that and not have many extra officers on standby at the very least. if your confused at that then you must be downright befuddled as to why they let them into the building..
Jun 26, 2022 -- 4:03PM, tobermory wrote:
In terms of Biden's popularity....He was 'unpopular' in the sense that there was very little enthusiasm for him, compared to Obama or Clinton.But he was not unpopular in the sense people had a big dislike for him.
people seem to forget biden was 4th in iowa with 13%, 5th in new hampshire with 8% and 2nd in nevada at 20% before the dnc had to throw their hands in the air and make all the other centrists drop out to make sure bernie didn't get in, most of biden's votes from super tuesday onwards came from the dropouts and the media (left and right decrying bernie as a communist) to ensure progressives didn't gain too much influence rather than people actually liking biden. that's before you even factor in the never trump vote voting for *insert any candidate here*
Jun 26, 2022 -- 9:40PM, Jack Bauer "24" wrote:
I've had all the money on Newsom at the biggest price of 990 traded on here and also at 770, 390 and a little bit more at 190. I have long considered him a future runner, and I think Biden and Harris should both stand aside as there are better candidates to fight out the nomination. Biden is too old and has served his purpose getting rid of Trump. Newsom v DeSantis would be a very interesting contest in 2024.
Excellent work. I didn't pay much attention to this market for the first year so never knew he'd been so high. It was crazy he was still 100+ after joining Truth Social, as that was a blatant move to position himself as a national figure 'taking on Trump'.
Jun 26, 2022 -- 10:26PM, Jack Bauer "24" wrote:
Iowa and New Hampshire are not representative of the Democratic Party as they are 90% white. They should be among the last states to vote, not the first two. Biden always said his campaign doesn't really start until South Carolina when black voters can vote in large numbers.
it was still a big blow for him and a very poor performance, and the opposite can be said of south carolina where he was expected to dominate
Jun 26, 2022 -- 9:40PM, Jack Bauer "24" wrote:
I've had all the money on Newsom at the biggest price of 990 traded on here and also at 770, 390 and a little bit more at 190. I have long considered him a future runner, and I think Biden and Harris should both stand aside as there are better candidates to fight out the nomination. Biden is too old and has served his purpose getting rid of Trump. Newsom v DeSantis would be a very interesting contest in 2024.
Very nice indeed! Do you intend to trade out if his price gets low enough?
Jun 26, 2022 -- 10:26PM, Jack Bauer "24" wrote:
Iowa and New Hampshire are not representative of the Democratic Party as they are 90% white. They should be among the last states to vote, not the first two. Biden always said his campaign doesn't really start until South Carolina when black voters can vote in large numbers.
Exactly. There are a lot of moves to try and change this state voting order, particularly after the farce in Iowa.
Jun 27, 2022 -- 7:18AM, A_T wrote:
I don't think there was adequate police there considering the event was planned days in advance, trump was stoking the flames of
Jun 27, 2022 -- 1:12PM, ----you-have-to-laugh--- wrote:
Smeerkats got some very interesting conditionalmarkets up. Might interest a few backing longshots.
I am not sure how much interest they will get on these markets. If this and if that doesn't really appeal.
Jun 27, 2022 -- 4:32PM, politicspunter wrote:
Does anyone recall what the rough amount matched was at this stage for the 2020 election? Not sure if there is any way to track that down. I do remember that the amounts matched rocketed after the election day as gullible Trumpers proceeded to wipe themselves out.
idk about this stage but irc after the election it went from like 300 million to over 1 billion i think. not sure we'll see stupidity like that again from trump bettors, although he is still fav to win the election
Jun 28, 2022 -- 9:35AM, A_T wrote:
AP reports that more than 1 MILLION voters across 43 states have switched to the Republican Partythat still leaves Trump 6 million behind Joe
Jun 28, 2022 -- 9:51AM, A_T wrote:
Marjorie Taylor Greene’s Request for Pardon Rejected After She Spelled It “Parton”WASHINGTON (The Borowitz Report)—The Trump White House rejected Marjorie Taylor Greene’s e-mail request for a pardon after she spelled it “parton,” new reports indicate.According to evidence obtained by the January 6th committee, the White House chief of staff, Mark Meadows, was perplexed by Greene’s entreaty, believing that it referred to the legendary singer-songwriter Dolly Parton.Meadows reportedly could not understand how Parton, whose extensive catalogue of hit songs includes “Jolene” and “9 to 5,” could be of assistance to Greene, and therefore he deleted the e-mail.
Jun 28, 2022 -- 9:35AM, A_T wrote:
AP reports that more than 1 MILLION voters across 43 states have switched to the Republican Partythat still leaves Trump 6 million behind Joe
Yes, and timber still failed to say how many have switched to the Democrat party
USA - Presidential Election 2024 -- Election Winner |
90 Runners £1,126,568 Matched |
103.5% | 92.7% | |||||||
Donald Trump | 4.5 | 4.6 | 4.7 | 4.8 | 4.9 | 5 | £453,313 | |
£96 | £270 | £22 | £159 | £88 | £730 | |||
Ron DeSantis | 4.5 | 4.6 | 4.7 | 4.8 | 5 | 5.1 | £87,244 | |
£100 | £281 | £16 | £205 | £336 | £610 | |||
Joe Biden | 6.8 | 7 | 7.2 | 7.4 | 7.6 | 7.8 | £253,693 | |
£657 | £730 | £58 | £422 | £311 | £70 | |||
Kamala Harris | 16 | 16.5 | 17 | 17.5 | 18 | 18.5 | £105,300 | |
£18 | £56 | £4 | £30 | £35 | £25 | |||
Mike Pence | 18 | 18.5 | 19 | 19.5 | 20 | 21 | £47,642 | |
£25 | £107 | £24 | £65 | £200 | £2 | |||
Nikki Haley | 32 | 36 | 38 | 40 | 42 | 44 | £24,121 | |
£50 | £47 | £14 | £3 | £13 | £26 | |||
Pete Buttigieg | 36 | 38 | 40 | 42 | 44 | 46 | £14,624 | |
£21 | £4 | £20 | £49 | £159 | £15 | |||
Michelle Obama | 25 | 26 | 28 | 46 | 48 | 50 | £8,728 | |
£2 | £20 | £4 | £1 | £2 | £15 | |||
Gavin Newsom | 36 | 38 | 40 | 46 | 48 | 50 | £2,095 | |
£20 | £1 | £3 | £11 | £18 | £5 | |||
Elizabeth Warren | 46 | 50 | 60 | 70 | 75 | 80 | £10,090 | |
£12 | £7 | £23 | £13 | £13 | £23 | |||
Mike Pompeo | 65 | 70 | 75 | 85 | 90 | 95 | £8,642 | |
£19 | £3 | £7 | £3 | £3 | £2 | |||
Dwayne Johnson | 50 | 60 | 65 | 70 | 75 | 80 | £13,701 | |
£9 | £2 | £119 | £50 | £244 | £243 | |||
Hillary Clinton | 50 | 55 | 60 | 75 | 80 | 85 | £10,486 | |
£26 | £54 | £18 | £2 | £28 | £23 | |||
Tom Cotton | 85 | 90 | 95 | 100 | 110 | 120 | £3,541 | |
£20 | £1 | £11 | £5 | £6 | £5 | |||
plus 76 more runners not listed above, at odds of over 100 |
Jun 28, 2022 -- 2:52PM, Whisperingdeath wrote:
Assuming Chump goes to jail as many do?
How many times can you be wrong about Trump & Johnson?
I feel embarrassed for you