Jun 23, 2015 -- 1:46PM, Dr Crippen wrote:
but hes right about you with this service crap crippen..Then tony why don't you let a house to a benefit claimer for cost only? By the way.When you see your doctor do you tell him he's living off taxpayers' money?When the police come around to answer your call do you tell them the same?When the ambulance driver is scraping you out of your car, do you give him a hard time over where his wages come from? Oh I see, it doesn't apply to them. You must think they're getting paid for providing a service
I give a hard time to all public sectors workers.....especially when they go on strikes demanding more money from the government- in turn steals more from the taxpayers. Why don't public sectors workers ask the private sector workers directly?
Jun 23, 2015 -- 12:45PM, Ski-Wiz wrote:
Dr Crippen.......your defence for receiving welfare by providing a services is crap. Landlords who gets money from the government, that stole it from taxpayers are no different to that of benefits breeders, immigrants, scroungers etc. A bank robber (government) who share the spoils of stolen money with a getaway driver (landlords), who was receiving payments for providing a services, does not justify the crime. Landlords who receives housing benefit does not earn the money legally......it's crony capitalism and the same as corporation who benefits from the government stealing money from taxpayers.New houses are expensive to build, and there's little you can do about the cost of building them.And if house prices tumble. That would be the end of house building for a good many years to come.Which would simply make matters worse. Utter rubbish. The cost of building houses can easily fall when those holding vast amount of land and order to build or lose the land. Stop expanding the money supply, remove housing subsidies, let the market fall to its correct level and the cost of building will fall too. The profit of building new houses are around £30k each house. Builders will just have to make do with less profit. Remove stupid regulations and the cost will fall.
Proof that house price can go down and so does the cost of building when government stops expanding the money supply.
Jun 24, 2015 -- 12:47PM, Dr Crippen wrote:
Ski-Wiz would like to see taxpayers' money being used to fund mortgages for the unemployed instead of paying them LHA.I don't know where these homes would come from.What he proposes would result in a society where no one under a certain income would actually work.People on low wages can't afford to buy their own homes.Yet if they were unemployed in the world that Ski-Wiz proposes, the government would buy a home for them.
If there are no landlords then there will be plenty of houses at cheaper prices.....I rather spend taxes on helping poor people rather than landlords....helping poor is max of 25 years rather than 25 to 60 years of my money to landlords. A condition can be attached to those who never worked that when they die.....the property is sold and the money used to reduce future housing benefit bills.
Landlords are nothing but scums.....to take money from taxpayers for their own benefit and will always defend their 'rights' and attack those poor people who can't get a job due to politicians incompetences.