Apr 29, 2015 -- 8:03AM, Angel Gabrial wrote:
Wonder if Miliband now agrees with him that it was the Jews who were responsible for 9/11?Here we go again CJ70 and his lies.
This should be good. Go on then, have a run at.
Apr 29, 2015 -- 8:11AM, Angel Gabrial wrote:
I thought Brand questioned the relationship between the Bush family and the Saudi`s CJ70?Not saying he is right or wrong to question this but were is Brand blaming the Jews for 9/11?Has he pointed the finger at Mossad? or has he actually blamed the Jews?
You thought wrong then. He called it controlled.
Apr 29, 2015 -- 8:13AM, Angel Gabrial wrote:
Not that i have read anywhere he has pointed the finger at Mossad, but is this what you are implying?I thought he was questioning the Saudi relationship with the Bush family.I`m just questioning this CJ because you do tell many a pork pie.
Are you also a truther?
Brand implies that it is the US Gov, not sure if you are aware of the connotations that truthers think the US Gov is run by Jews?
You are going to tell me he's not an anti-semite because he once did acid at passover next?
Apr 29, 2015 -- 8:25AM, Angel Gabrial wrote:
You thought wrong then. He called it controlled.CJ70 Did he blame the Jews for 9/11 or not?? come on big lad let it all hang out!!
I'm waiting for a blood libel here.
Apr 29, 2015 -- 8:30AM, Angel Gabrial wrote:
CJ70I`m not sure if you know how this works. You made an accusation, you are questioned on it and you provide the evidence.Now stop flirting with me and SHOW US THE EVIDENCE WHERE BRAND HAS BLAMED THE JEWS FOR 9/11.
So let me get this straight you are expecting me to provide a link that would see Brand in court?
I wonder if there's one out there.
Apr 29, 2015 -- 8:39AM, Angel Gabrial wrote:
Russell is probably reading this CJ, he loves a bet on the snooker and often flits between that forum and this.
He can sue me then.
Of course he wont because he knows as well as you do the implication of what he's saying.
Still we can still boycott Israel can't we?
Apr 29, 2015 -- 8:50AM, Angel Gabrial wrote:
Well at least you are brave enough to challenge him to libel CJ.Although it certainly helps if you don`t have anything to lose.
Hard to bring a libel case against something that's true. Nice ad hom.
I'm more worried that you think 9/11 truthers are harmless.
Apr 29, 2015 -- 9:34AM, Angel Gabrial wrote:
Your nose must cause pedestrians to duck for cover CJ.Where have i said 9/11 truthers are harmless?
Sorry, as you came out batting for a truther I assumed you thought it was kosher? Am I wrong?
Apr 29, 2015 -- 9:40AM, Angel Gabrial wrote:
Hard to bring a libel case against something that's true.Innocent til proven guilty CJ, you must be loaded with evidence that no-one else has.
I think most people are only to aware what these conspiracy nutters think.
Perhaps you've been brainwashed by the Illuminati?
Apr 29, 2015 -- 9:50AM, Angel Gabrial wrote:
CJ i have been blocked by Truthers for the same reason as i am challenging you.Asking for a snippet of evidence to back up their accusations.You are closer to the mindset of a truther than you realise.You accuse Brand of blaming the Jews for 9/11...and you are all bluster when asked for evidence.
Hold on. You've been blocked by truthers but you don't know what they stand for?
Brand is an anti-semite, good luck defending him. Perhaps if he comes from the snooker forum he can defend that as well, not sure once going to passover really cuts it.
Apr 29, 2015 -- 10:10AM, Angel Gabrial wrote:
It seems that you are confused CJ. Truthers are not part of an ant-semite movement. They are part of a movement who dispute the 9/11 commission report.
Yeah and Stop the War want to bomb Israel because they are a peace organisation.
Apr 29, 2015 -- 10:13AM, Angel Gabrial wrote:
CJJust remember that once you challenge the establishment you get accused of all manner of things whether you are Farage or Brand.
Are you a truther as well?
Is this your angle?
Apr 29, 2015 -- 10:21AM, Angel Gabrial wrote:
No i am not a Truther CJ, and i wish that you would stick to the truth CJ. You come on here spouting lies if it`s not about Brand blaming Jews for 9/11, it`s Miliband tweeting 13 year old girls harbouring sexual fantasies about him.It`s probably time for you to change your ways CJ.
I'll be honest I could only put your strange intervention in this thread as you being a truther. Your defense of them as not anti-semitic was strange..
It all makes sense now, you are clinging to me mixing up a teenage girls age as your only argument.
That probably says a lot more about you than it does of me.
Apr 29, 2015 -- 10:45AM, Angel Gabrial wrote:
It all makes sense now, you are clinging to me mixing up a teenage girls age as your only argument.I`m afraid not CJ, you played your cards and got caught with 5 jacks. YOU created a story of Miliband and a 13 year old girl. That is gutter press material, yet strangely you seem proud.Are you slightly sick in the head CJ?
Which just tells everyone you pay more attention to teenage girls than I do.
As I remember asking in that thread, did you think 17 was fair game? That's the only reason I can see that you made a song and dance about it.
Apr 29, 2015 -- 12:59PM, Angel Gabrial wrote:
CJ70You created a story about Miliband and a 13 year old girl with sexual fantasies about Miliband. This was created in YOUR mind.a) She was 17b) She had no sexual fantasy about Milibandc) Milibands tweet was purely about politics.17 year old girls are definitely fair game to be involved in politics, only an oddball would suggest otherwise. You sir are that oddball.
I posted that Miliband had been tweeting a 13 year old girl, you corrected me that she was 17. You pay more attention to teenage girls than I do, I accepted that. Great point scoring!
The rest of your post I brought up in the other thread, you ran away from it.
As I put to you in the other thread if it was a boy band member who was replying to a 17 year old girl who had posted "top totty" & "my bae" among other things we'd be asking questions to his motives.
Do you think its wise for a boy band member to message a teenage girl about music? Let alone a boy band member in a group with a less than stellar reputation?
Nice ad hom again.
Apr 29, 2015 -- 1:45PM, spellingandgrammarchecker wrote:
what does 'my bae' mean?
I'll wait for Angel Gabrial to answer that one assuming he hasn't run away again.
He's seemingly at pains to follow me around trying to prove how much more he knows about teenage girls than I do.
Apr 29, 2015 -- 3:02PM, Angel Gabrial wrote:
I posted that Miliband had been tweeting a 13 year old girl, you corrected me that she was 17. You pay more attention to teenage girls than I do, I accepted that. Great point scoring! Sorry for pointing out the truth CJ, it obviously upsets your teenage fantasies. Oddball
Quite happy for you to correct me if I'm wrong. As I said at the time.
You chasing me around the forum about teenage girls makes one of us an oddball. Not sure It's me.
Apr 29, 2015 -- 6:18PM, Angel Gabrial wrote:
You chasing me around the forum about teenage girls makes one of us an oddball. Not sure It's me.It the Brand blames Jews for 9/11 bullshine that made me comment on this thread CJ. Is your brain bank overflowing with so much junk it is effecting your short term memory?
Yeah, I forgot. You don't think truthers are anti-semitic.
The ones that block you probably think you are having a laugh.
Apr 29, 2015 -- 6:37PM, spellingandgrammarchecker wrote:
spellingandgrammarchecker 29 Apr 15 19:45 what does 'my bae' mean?And there I was thinking it was a simple question if it had already been posted. Apparently not.
AG seemingly doesn't want to answer for some reason.
It's short for baby.
Apr 30, 2015 -- 1:09PM, Dr Crippen wrote:
^At least Ed would have one David who would be wishing him well.
May 1, 2015 -- 12:44AM, melv wrote:
Its going to get a million hits in 2 days. Brilliant.
All of them told to vote Green.
May 1, 2015 -- 11:27AM, melv wrote:
I do not think this is all about Russell brand. He has created a political forum the like of which has never been seen. He puts a massive amount of work in and deploys communication skills few have. Held his own against Paxman for one.Obviously he's a clown. But he's not only a clown. I think he knows his limitations. And he has got plenty. For me he's too "Spiritual" and "Therapy" and " New Agey". He also has made little effort to master economics which leaves him sounding ill-informed at times. He looks a dope next to Max Keiser for example and I very much doubt he would comprehend Steve Keen.But these weakness and others are dwarfed by the forum he has created. Millions of young people are going to grow up with this platform he has. They are going to change the world because in ten or twenty years they will be the world. Jaysus I hope to God its not the alternative. More carbon copies of us lot. Buncha selfish bstds.
No offence, but there was a chap in Germany who did that.
They both hated the same people. I hope we've moved on from brainwashing idiots.
May 1, 2015 -- 8:05PM, Angel Gabrial wrote:
CJ excuse me for pointing this out, and i know that you are desperate because you hold a personal grudge against Brand but he is not like Hiltler.Hitler hated Jews, full stop.Brand is opposed to right-wing factions of the Israeli government like he is everywhere. He does not hate Jews just because he points the finger at Jewish corporations, is this how you think the anti-semite status is acquired? Of course not you are just anti socialist aren`t you? a hater of socialists. You hate these Jews don`t you CJ? and there are millions more left wing Jews who you hate CJ. Are you ant - semite CJ? there was a chap in Germany..........Noam ChomskyLeon TrotskyKarl Marx
Yepp and Brand fans like yourself will follow him whatever he does.
I think we've learned that.
Soda-streams are the cause of 'orrible right-wing Israeli Gov. Punish them!
May 6, 2015 -- 11:21AM, melv wrote:
Its about the workers of world the not moaning old men.
Surely that's the shirkers of the world if you want Labour?