Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
A.H HUNTER esq.
30 Dec 09 21:13
Joined:
Date Joined: 14 Jun 06
| Topic/replies: 16,312 | Blogger: A.H HUNTER esq.'s blog
What about the helicopter budget in 2004 ? .
Did the savings pay for Mr Smith,s porno,s , or NHS operations for NHS immigrants ? ,or Prezzas 2nd jag ? or something else ? .

Never mind Labour have promised an adequate supply in 2013.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 11
By:
Marxist-Leninist
When: 30 Dec 09 21:15
By NHS immigrants i assume you are refering to the consultants, surgeons and nurses without whom it would collapse?
By:
treetop
When: 30 Dec 09 21:16
It did help to pay for Prescott's world tour when he left office. After all he desperately needed to talk to that US millionaire who ran casinos about the work of William Wilberforce in the abolition of slavery.
By:
Shab
When: 30 Dec 09 21:20
By NHS immigrants

I think he was referring to 'NHS tourists', ie, people who come here and then miraculously find some life threatening illness that they 'never knew' they had.
By:
Mister E
When: 31 Dec 09 12:55
The NHS is reliant on immigrant labour.

Without importing nurses and care staff en masse from Third World Countries we would need to pay a lot higher wages.
By:
HarryCrumb
When: 31 Dec 09 12:58
Or just lower benefits to encourage the idle to work.
By:
macarony
When: 31 Dec 09 13:00
Mister E 31 Dec 13:55


The NHS is reliant on immigrant labour.

Without importing nurses and care staff en masse from Third World Countries we would need to pay a lot higher wages.


So you would prefer to rob the third world of their health staff. While at the same time deny our youg people of the chance to train and earn a living.
Well thats modern socialism for you.
By:
Mister E
When: 31 Dec 09 13:19
sorry macarony did not make it clear, I think it is hypocritical that we take staff from the Third World to keep NHS wages low.
By:
1st time poster
When: 31 Dec 09 13:36
lower benefits,how many times do you need tv and media people to try and live on benefits before you,ll agree they are to low as it is,dont be misled by the dailys showing proffesional scroungers who no the system and spare a thought for those struggling to survive week in week out
By:
HarryCrumb
When: 31 Dec 09 14:17
?
By:
V4 Vendetta
When: 31 Dec 09 14:25
Like the ones on 20k of benefits in flats in Kensignton for example?
By:
thewhitedog
When: 31 Dec 09 14:59
1st Time poster says:-
..how many times do you need tv and media people to try and live on benefits before you,ll agree they are to low

Ah but do those media people also get family tax credit/family allowance/housing benefit and all the other various add-ons that many scroungers get? So much so that it's not worth them bothering to look for work. (Not that too many would employ the feckless, lazy bu**ers).

Give real help to the genuine unemployed and disabled by all means, but we all know a huge chunk of benefit/disability claimants are shysters ( and thus voting fodder for Labour - if the can spelll "X" ).
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com