Forums
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
noddys ryde
25 Nov 09 18:02
Joined:
Date Joined: 15 Feb 02
| Topic/replies: 1,864 | Blogger: noddys ryde's blog
would the country grind to a halt if Cameron just got rid of them all on day one?
Show More
Loading...
Report subversion November 25, 2009 8:57 PM GMT
sounds like the kind of thing we need a quango to investigate
Report flushgordon November 25, 2009 9:11 PM GMT
umbongo umbongo de drink it in de quango
Report tangsoodo November 25, 2009 9:40 PM GMT
mass unemployment. nap
Report Big Charlie November 26, 2009 8:35 AM GMT
Johnny was a wrestler.
Report La Parata November 26, 2009 10:47 AM GMT
In answer to your question Noddy, the country didn't grind to a halt before we had them. Cameron is on record as saying that he will look at them and see where potential cost savings can be made.
He is in for a long time-consuming exercise methinks. When Nulabour came to power we apparently had 135 quangos. We now have 1,162, employing 700,000 bureaucrats and costing the taxpayer £64bn each year.

When Labour first took office it pledged to reduce the existing 135 and make government smaller. In fact, before getting elected to office in 1997, Brown promised a "bonfire" of all the quangos.

It makes you want to weep doesn't it!
Report Ivor November 26, 2009 11:03 AM GMT
It seems so bad for the persons employed - it's so hard to undo what has already be done.
However, we all (well almost all) know where the blame lies.
Report noddys ryde November 27, 2009 7:43 AM GMT
If I was PM I would list all 1162 quangos on the net and as I got rid of em would cross em out so everyone could chart my progress.
Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.

Wonder

Instance ID: 13539
www.betfair.com