Politics
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Listening to a radio 4 programme in the car last weekend and this guy said he doubted the benefit of Chilcot's enquiry with all the 'usual anti-war suspects' being unlikely to accept its findings. He claimed to have always supported the war as a means to get rid of Saddam Hussein and wished that the marsh Arabs and the Kurds could appear at the enquiry to justify regime change. Is this man all there ? What has he done of note that justifies a lifetime pension from the Lords now ? He seems to be more likely to pollute the Lords if he is that stupid.
Show More
He is a fat, drink raddled **** who can always be depended upon to spout the Nulabour line. As an MSP and lord he is known for gorging at both the House of Lords and Holyrood troughs.
... his moment of glory:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/8045414.stm
I can forgive his being a fat b@stard for that performance.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/8045414.stm
I can forgive his being a fat b@stard for that performance.
A fair point to challenege TV presenters but clearly avoiding the question by attacking on another front. Why did the speaker use very expensive lawyers to prevent the public from knowing the truth? She was fully entitled to ask that question and expect to receive an answer. It still bothers me that he seeks to defend an illegal war for the sake of regime change.That entitles the perpetrators to appear at the Haguein due time for war crimes.
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539