Politics
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Portillo said as much in an interview with Andrew Neil yesterday.
Big businesses to get tax cuts, which means you and me will pay for the haves to have more at the expense of the have nots.
He will later make sure that his mates, and their families, with their multi million pound homes, will make a killing out of the slashing of inheritance tax.
I really have to laugh at the people on here who think that Cameron and the Tories are going to make things better for them.
Its amazing that he is able to seduce ordinary working class people into voting for him and thereby funding his handouts to his fellow toffs.
Big businesses to get tax cuts, which means you and me will pay for the haves to have more at the expense of the have nots.
He will later make sure that his mates, and their families, with their multi million pound homes, will make a killing out of the slashing of inheritance tax.
I really have to laugh at the people on here who think that Cameron and the Tories are going to make things better for them.
Its amazing that he is able to seduce ordinary working class people into voting for him and thereby funding his handouts to his fellow toffs.
Show More
Big businesses to get tax cuts, which means you and me will pay for the haves to have more at the expense of the have nots.
perhaps the "haves" would be happy to pay for themselves. im not defending him nor advocating his candicy, but i am defending tax cuts. should be for individuals too though, across the board.
how is it that you think you are paying for the "haves"? i dont understand how you think you are, so i dont understand how it can be at the expense of the have nots other than not necessarily continuing to give them things that weren't theirs in the first place..
perhaps the "haves" would be happy to pay for themselves. im not defending him nor advocating his candicy, but i am defending tax cuts. should be for individuals too though, across the board.
how is it that you think you are paying for the "haves"? i dont understand how you think you are, so i dont understand how it can be at the expense of the have nots other than not necessarily continuing to give them things that weren't theirs in the first place..
20 % for certain defined ' luxury ' items would be welcome - ie Chelsea Tractors, jewellery , mobile phones, TVs , spirits and foreign holidays would be a good idea.
Who needs expensive mobiles ? Who needs television ?
Who needs expensive mobiles ? Who needs television ?
VAT was , and is, a rather complicated form of purchase tax devised by the EU. Local sales tax instead ?
yeh why not? allow local authorities to spend what they receive too, in the main, with only a slice going to central government. and that's if the tax is even needed at all...
im still not convinced tbh. we are being taxed left right and centre and it doesnt seem to be doing any good.
im still not convinced tbh. we are being taxed left right and centre and it doesnt seem to be doing any good.
forget lib demmy golfjudge,pompey mike for PM,THE TRUE VOICE OF THE LEFT ON BETFAIR
the left are happy to pay tax on their purchases even if its not necessary?? even though they already pay tax on their earnings??
or is it because they dont pay tax on their earnings anyway because they dont earn and in fact their income is provided by others?
Remind me how much council tax has gone up in the last 12 years, mostly in the poorer areas
im currently paying £12 a month towards the building of my local mosque..
Don, take your breakfast in if your paying that much, Dont thnk that Bacon Sarnies will go down that well
and how about a euro tax eh people. it wont actually raise taxes, honest..
Tax should be levied in proportion to ability to pay.
Unfortunately we have not had a Left Wing Government in the UK for the past 12 years.
Are we assuming Darling won't raise VAT ?
Unfortunately we have not had a Left Wing Government in the UK for the past 12 years.
Are we assuming Darling won't raise VAT ?
Tax should be levied in proportion to ability to pay.
says you. bold statement imo.
says you. bold statement imo.
Your right Pompeymike the Tories are always keener on indirect taxation rather than direct taxation (income tax), like the the poll tax, because as you rightly point out this unevenly prejudices the poor and aids the wealthy; after all the affluent in society were the group the Conservative party were set-up to look after in the first place.
Their always promoting the idea of a flat tax rather than one which takes account of peoples ability to pay, if they really believe uniformity is such a good idea why don't they promote a flat wage instead?
Their always promoting the idea of a flat tax rather than one which takes account of peoples ability to pay, if they really believe uniformity is such a good idea why don't they promote a flat wage instead?
if i had millions, i would gladly give more than my share, if it were truly needed, but out of choice not because somebody told me to. they can jog on. flat is fair. and they can especially jog on since it's not needed anyway. get rid of most of those indirect taxes too if you want something from my income and stop spending it all on sht and encouraging people to let the state support them, otherwise you'll get nowt from me. cut the war out too, and the oppressive control-freak system of rules. :)
If ashcoft paid his taxes
instead of buying the nasty tory party
would we still be broke
party befor country
nasty tory
instead of buying the nasty tory party
would we still be broke
party befor country
nasty tory
no moves 23 Nov 00:08
Your right Pompeymike the Tories are always keener on indirect taxation rather than direct taxation (income tax), like the the poll tax, because as you rightly point out this unevenly prejudices the poor and aids the wealthy.
spot on no moves, that is why NL were Tories wearing red rosettes.
Remember Blair smirking before the poster promising to peg the Top Rate at 40%
A raft of indirect taxes instead, and then abolished the 10% rate rather than touch the top rate. Nasty Tories.
Your right Pompeymike the Tories are always keener on indirect taxation rather than direct taxation (income tax), like the the poll tax, because as you rightly point out this unevenly prejudices the poor and aids the wealthy.
spot on no moves, that is why NL were Tories wearing red rosettes.
Remember Blair smirking before the poster promising to peg the Top Rate at 40%
A raft of indirect taxes instead, and then abolished the 10% rate rather than touch the top rate. Nasty Tories.
This thread proves that the dumbos just dont understand the state we're in.
If Cameron had any sense he'd get a job back in PR
If Cameron had any sense he'd get a job back in PR
Its pointless now trying to have any sensible debate with Labour supporters on here. They are so deluded and so willing just to believe the bare faced lies that Brown spouts. I actually hope Brown does win so they get to see exactly what damage he has done.Lets be fair Cameron cant put things right now we are too far gone and our nation is stuffed full of lazy greedy and selfish people. Might as well watch Brown collapse things as to let Cameron try to avoiid the inevitable.
The next few years Budgets will be the same regardless of who wins Red Tory or Blue Labour,
and Gordon's "Act" to reduce the deficit by 50% uin four years makes FA difference.
and Gordon's "Act" to reduce the deficit by 50% uin four years makes FA difference.
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539