Forums
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
NobbyClarke
15 Nov 09 08:30
Joined:
Date Joined: 05 May 07
| Topic/replies: 11,794 | Blogger: NobbyClarke's blog
We've all read about them in the Daily Mail, there's a whole tribe of them featured in today's NotW

http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/news/599106/Scandal-of-benefit-grabbing-family-who-live-a-life-of-idleness-Robert-Dosser-Smith-and-his-brood-of-20.html

While there can be little doubt these people are not keen on work how does the country deal with families that just breed for benefits?

There can be no doubt that the country just can not afford the amount spent on benefits.

So with unemployment probably double the Official 2.4m how do we stop Chardonnay Jones, who left school in June with no qualifications, from having 7 kids by 5 different Dads in the next decade?

That must be one of the big challenges for any incoming Tory Government.
Pause Switch to Standard View Breeding for Benefits
Show More
Loading...
Report M@C November 15, 2009 8:56 AM GMT
Should build one estate in every major city with high rise flats to house these filth. Pay them only in tokens for the bare neccessities needed to survive.

Maybe then, they would be willing to work to get out of the concrete jungle ;-)
Report jack brown November 15, 2009 9:23 AM GMT
didn't we introduce these incentives for children due to the populous carnage of WW2. In future wars I doubt we would rely on conscription, so the point of these incentives are now counterproductive.
Report layem&payem November 15, 2009 9:28 AM GMT
M@C 15 Nov 09:56


Should build one estate in every major city with high rise flats to house these filth. Pay them only in tokens for the bare neccessities needed to survive.

Maybe then, they would be willing to work to get out of the concrete jungle

Spot on.................................................only have money if you work for it.
Report Big Charlie November 15, 2009 9:30 AM GMT
Sir Nick, OBE, was supposed to have suggested brick walls in cities to divivde the indigenous from other races.

He allegedly said 'They don't want to mix with the indigenous, and some of the indigenous don't want to mix with them.'

Which is undoubtedly true.

But of course, with Sir Nick, OBE, being white, it was deemed racist.

So all the asians and blacks descended en masse to have their own large communities in some areas, and the indigenous who could afford it, moved out.

No difference whatsoever to having walls.

But are the asians and blacks deemed racist for sticking together in massive numbers in some areas, rather than spreading out to all parts of the UK ?

This is normally where the luvvies post :

A) They have to stick together because of racists.'

But in the next sentence they will spout :

B) Thank god Griffins supporters are in a minority.'

Which is quite funny.
Report NobbyClarke November 15, 2009 9:47 AM GMT
There are no jobs for Chardonnay Jones & her host of ne'er-do-well lovers.

There are at least 5.7m people either on JSA, Incapacity Benefit or looking for work but not able to claim because a partner works.

In the 1950s or 1960s a car worker might produce 3 cars a year, now it's more likely 300 or they are made in the Far East for £300.

We have check-out machines in supermarkets.

We have to accept that the Chardonnay Joneses of this world will never work.

So how do we stop her having 7 kids?
Report caleyjags November 15, 2009 10:22 AM GMT
Stop benefits and give them food vouchers. Once they realise they can't get their weekly cigs off the taxpayer they will find work and we wont need all the Poles to come here and do those jobs.
Report Big Charlie November 15, 2009 10:44 AM GMT
What about the non-smokers?
Report Lampus November 15, 2009 11:08 AM GMT
Anyone who got more then £250,000 in the bank and claiming benefits
should be shot
Heating benefits
Child tax credits
Private school tax credits
Private medical tax credits
State handouts to the rich is more or less endless
Report Big Charlie November 15, 2009 11:21 AM GMT
I don't think you can claim with that much in the bank.

I was told about 15 years ago that if you had more than £8k in the bank here they looked into it, but in southern Ireland, at the same time, you were allowed £16k in the bank.

It may have changed since then.
Report Tallywagger. November 15, 2009 11:22 AM GMT
This is going to cause some serious problems in the not too distant future.

I propose:

Benefit only for the first child

No benefit for second child

If you have a third child, you lose benefit for the first.
Report Ronaldinho's dentist November 15, 2009 11:28 AM GMT
the threshold for claiming benefits is around £11 k now I think, doesnt affect DLA though
Report NobbyClarke November 15, 2009 12:49 PM GMT
I think all benefits should be linked to education. Some of these people can barely read and write.

Vouchers until they have 5 good GCSEs
Report monmore man November 15, 2009 1:39 PM GMT
As soon as anybody, and I litterally mean anybody, goes to the state to ask for financial help for a child they must have the operation where future breeding is no longer an issue. They can only sting us once then.
Report For the benefit of Mr Kite November 15, 2009 7:42 PM GMT
You don't mean anybody, literally anybody ,as you would be making exceptions for widows .
Report unbiased November 15, 2009 8:09 PM GMT
When the 1 bed flat becomes unmanageable,up pops the 2 bed version!!!!!!,or 2 or 3 bed house!!!!!!! at what cost!!!!!!
Report Ruth November 15, 2009 10:15 PM GMT
Now that's a cracking start to a point of view. I fact a real gem, a classic even.

"We've all read about them in the Daily Mail"!

Splendid stuff.

We all haven't.

The Daily Mail supported Hitler before the War. It has become more extreme and certainly less truthful since then.

If its in the Mail it is certainly a lie.

Wise up.
Report anextraonbenhur November 15, 2009 10:35 PM GMT
NobbyClarke 15 Nov 13:49
I think all benefits should be linked to education. Some of these people can barely read and write.

Vouchers until they have 5 good GCSEs


Bit cruel........don't agree with Lampus, Pussy and Narcky......but.
Report noddys ryde November 16, 2009 10:13 AM GMT
We should pay them money and give them flats if they do not have children rather than if they do.
Report ripped off November 16, 2009 10:17 AM GMT
You should have a reversable operation at birth so you can't have children. Then when you want to start a family you need to apply to have the opp reversed. That should sort them out unless of course the decisions are made by Mohammed and Ranjit or Dr J and Neartic. We may have an unbalanced population then.
Report angermanagement November 17, 2009 7:02 PM GMT
sharia law is the way forward for these people..public stonings.. the govt could raise some entrance fee money
Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.

Wonder

Instance ID: 13539
www.betfair.com