Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
nononsense
13 Nov 09 12:34
Joined:
Date Joined: 24 Oct 02
| Topic/replies: 432 | Blogger: nononsense's blog
If every grown adult in the world was given the same amount of money, same property , clothes, car etc.
what sort of world would it be?

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 26
By:
bazzar
When: 13 Nov 09 12:36
Some would lose what they had on here and others would accumulate more wealth.
By:
HarryCrumb
When: 13 Nov 09 12:43
It would soon revert back as the hardworking earnt more and the lazy wasted theirs, whilst the clever would take money from the stupid. Give it a decade and its back to square 1.
By:
nononsense
When: 13 Nov 09 13:12
so it would hard to sustain equality because of human nature
By:
nononsense
When: 13 Nov 09 13:18
#theoretical
By:
sfc1976
When: 13 Nov 09 13:18
What a depressing world that would be. No reward for individual effort or initiative.
"If your only opportunity is to be equal, then it is not opportunity". Mrs T.
By:
Dr J
When: 13 Nov 09 13:59
Note that Mrs T doesn't mention equality of opportunity.
By:
4thjulykid
When: 13 Nov 09 14:07
Communism .
By:
sfc1976
When: 13 Nov 09 14:09
Noted.
By:
evski
When: 13 Nov 09 14:13
i don't think you fully grasp the concept of communism.
By:
4thjulykid
When: 13 Nov 09 14:19
Here you go

Part of the Politics series on
Communism

Concepts[show]Common ownership
Egalitarianism
Classless society
Class struggle
Proletarian internationalism
World revolution

Aspects[show]Communist state
Communist party
Communist revolution
Communist symbolism
Communism and religion
History of communism

Variants[show]Marxism
Leninism
Trotskyism
Maoism · Juche
Left communism
Luxemburgism
Council communism · Titoism
Stalinism
Castroism
Guevarism
Hoxhaism
Anarchist communism
Religious communism
Eurocommunism
World communism
Stateless communism
National communism
Internationals[show]Communist League
First International
Second International
Third International
Fourth International

People[show]  François-Noël Babeuf
Karl Marx
Friedrich Engels
Peter Kropotkin
Herman Gorter
Rosa Luxemburg
Antonio Gramsci
Vladimir Lenin
**Trotsky
Joseph Stalin
Mao Zedong
Che Guevara
Ho Chi Minh
Deng Xiaoping
Murray Bookchin
Kim Il-sung
 Josip Broz Tito
 Mikhail Gorbachev

Related topics[show]Anarchism · Anti-capitalism
Anti-communism
Cold War
Communist World
Criticisms of communism
Democratic centralism
Dictatorship of the proletariat
Left-wing politics
McCarthyism
New Class · New Left
Post-communism
Primitive communism
Scientific Communism
Scientific socialism
Socialism · Socialist economics
Soviet Union

Communism Portal
Politics portal
v
By:
Ivor
When: 13 Nov 09 14:19
if everyone was as wealthy as their boss - why would they work for them!
'I want to recruit you' - 'no I AM going to recruit YOU' - no I'm ...
By:
evski
When: 13 Nov 09 14:31
4thjulykid, I was talking to nononsense as his original post seems to be some sort of dig at the idea of communism, although that cut-n-paste shows that you do have a deep knowledge of the subject.

Communism is without doubt the pinnacle for humanity to aim for, it can't be achieved for a long time yet because we do not have the technology or the inclination. Think of star trek; once there is no poverty and the technology so that people have no materiel wants the only purpose to will be self-betterment (that probably isn't a real word).
By:
noddys ryde
When: 13 Nov 09 14:45
Dr J-Mrs T was the product of the institution that brought equality of opportunity to more working class kids than anything in our nations history-the grammer school- destroyed by the liars of course.
By:
Dr J
When: 13 Nov 09 15:23
How can you boast about equality of opportunity when 85% of working class kids never got near a grammar school please?
By:
nononsense
When: 13 Nov 09 15:43
I would have thought pure communism can never work because of human weakness/human nature.
where it has been tried , there has misery/poverty/oppression/corruption.
By:
noddys ryde
When: 13 Nov 09 16:22
Dr J-15% were able enough to sieze the opportunity. Now 0% are able to do the same so good education is the preserve of the wealthy.
By:
Dr J
When: 13 Nov 09 17:02
The cvurrent system is rubbish, I agree, but to describe 15% as 'equality of opportunity' is simply laughable.
By:
noddys ryde
When: 13 Nov 09 17:18
Dr J-equality of opportunity is about able people having the chance to excel. It is not about the dross dragging down the able.
By:
Lozzy
When: 13 Nov 09 17:40
We do have equality of opportunity as good as it will ever get.

Anybody can become someone if they work hard enough.
By:
flushgordon
When: 13 Nov 09 18:25
even immigrants lozzy?
By:
STUDYFORM
When: 13 Nov 09 19:33
How much total blollollox can you get in one thread?
See Above
By:
4thjulykid
When: 13 Nov 09 22:37
evski 13 Nov 15:31


4thjulykid, I was talking to nononsense as his original post seems to be some sort of dig at the idea of communism, although that cut-n-paste shows that you do have a deep knowledge of the subject.


Evski , you patronizing prig . You have no idea what knowledge I have or do not have . You do not know me . I made the mistake of taking your earlier comment as a smarty a.rse comment to my reply to the poster. The cut and paste saved me explaining my one word reply ( I believe the posters question simply described Marxs' original thoughts on the subject , hence my reply)
By:
Dr J
When: 14 Nov 09 16:13
equality of opportunity is about able people having the chance to excel.

The same chance?
By:
evski
When: 14 Nov 09 16:42
4thjulykid, if you want to contribute to a fred then may i suggest the best way is neither single word posts of massive cut-n-pastes.

study is correct- this fred, including my innane ramblings, is absolute bu11shyte.
By:
errytay
When: 14 Nov 09 19:30
Evski
You suggest

Who the hell are you ? The forum police ? The Stasi maybe .
By:
V4 Vendetta
When: 15 Nov 09 10:27
Dr J 14 Nov 17:13

equality of opportunity is about able people having the chance to excel.

The same chance?


It's not really quite that. "Giving" people the chance implies a control society in the first place (and necessarily would involve 'taking' by force from others), it's more about not taking anything away from people so they can pass on what they like to their children (knowledge, principles, wealth, etc).
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com