<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Stoke-on-Trent Central</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/30786077/stoke-on-trent-central</link><description>Labour MP Tristram Hunt quits to become director of Victoria and Albert Museum</description><item><title>Haven't done the work to look into the postal voting percentages, but I'd be very surprised if it was a three-way tie on postal votes.On the ground I have people saying that Lab were comfortably third on the day, granted that is anecdotal and probabl</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/30786077/stoke-on-trent-central?post_id=551301663#551301663</link><description>Haven't done the work to look into the postal voting percentages, but I'd be very surprised if it was a three-way tie on postal votes.On the ground I have people saying that Lab were comfortably third on the day, granted that is anecdotal and probabl</description><pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2017 05:53:39 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I backed Labour for both seats hoping to put the mockers on them........oh well one out of two ain't bad !</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/30786077/stoke-on-trent-central?post_id=551282049#551282049</link><description>I backed Labour for both seats hoping to put the mockers on them........oh well one out of two ain't bad !</description><pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2017 12:51:36 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Thanks Injera.  Yes, saw that Crick clip and it didn't look good but the odds I felt were so good on the Labour candidate in what many folks (me included) considered a very close two horse race that I stuck with it.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/30786077/stoke-on-trent-central?post_id=551281453#551281453</link><description>Thanks Injera.  Yes, saw that Crick clip and it didn't look good but the odds I felt were so good on the Labour candidate in what many folks (me included) considered a very close two horse race that I stuck with it.</description><pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2017 11:30:00 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Nice work Meadow! You did your research and it paid off. I came out of Stoke with a small loss. Backed UKIP when the Labour remain candidate was announced but took the hit out when the wheels started to come off their campaign. Didn't touch Copeland</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/30786077/stoke-on-trent-central?post_id=551280947#551280947</link><description>Nice work Meadow! You did your research and it paid off. I came out of Stoke with a small loss. Backed UKIP when the Labour remain candidate was announced but took the hit out when the wheels started to come off their campaign. Didn't touch Copeland</description><pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2017 10:42:40 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Good job I wasn't listening very closely, I assumed he meant Stoke. LOL. I wonder if this was the reason for the confusion in the Copeland market: I noticed that it suspended when some punters were still laying at as high as 1.14. Normally, you would</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/30786077/stoke-on-trent-central?post_id=551272359#551272359</link><description>Good job I wasn't listening very closely, I assumed he meant Stoke. LOL. I wonder if this was the reason for the confusion in the Copeland market: I noticed that it suspended when some punters were still laying at as high as 1.14. Normally, you would</description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2017 12:12:39 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>https://order-order.com/2017/02/24/dimbleby-calls-copeland-wrong/Hope this helps.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/30786077/stoke-on-trent-central?post_id=551272259#551272259</link><description>https://order-order.com/2017/02/24/dimbleby-calls-copeland-wrong/Hope this helps.</description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2017 11:58:25 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>well done, Meadow, btw.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/30786077/stoke-on-trent-central?post_id=551272197#551272197</link><description>well done, Meadow, btw.</description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2017 11:51:58 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>On Question Time Dimbelby wrongly announced that Labour had held Copeland.Did he actually say "Copeland"? I wasn't listening all that closely. Fortunately for me, I automatically assumed that he meant Stoke, as that's where the debate was broadcast f</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/30786077/stoke-on-trent-central?post_id=551272189#551272189</link><description>On Question Time Dimbelby wrongly announced that Labour had held Copeland.Did he actually say "Copeland"? I wasn't listening all that closely. Fortunately for me, I automatically assumed that he meant Stoke, as that's where the debate was broadcast f</description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2017 11:51:20 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>thanks treetop, much appreciated.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/30786077/stoke-on-trent-central?post_id=551272123#551272123</link><description>thanks treetop, much appreciated.</description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2017 11:43:12 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Good calls meadow, throughout you explained your reasoning and deserved to show a profit. We may differ at times but credit where credit is due.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/30786077/stoke-on-trent-central?post_id=551271105#551271105</link><description>Good calls meadow, throughout you explained your reasoning and deserved to show a profit. We may differ at times but credit where credit is due.</description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2017 09:45:18 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
