<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Which does the UK taxpayer spend more on?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/30717479/which-does-the-uk-taxpayer-spend-more-on</link><description>Choice of two for this one:1. Subsidies that benefit owners of UK farmland2. Subsidies that benefit owners of non-UK farmland</description><item><title>Gotta love Malvinas. Kinda like Wolfy shouting Up the revolution.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/30717479/which-does-the-uk-taxpayer-spend-more-on?post_id=549771167#549771167</link><description>Gotta love Malvinas. Kinda like Wolfy shouting Up the revolution.</description><pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2016 18:15:00 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>.http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/newsroom/292_en.htmThe EU has decided that milk is too cheap, and thanks to an Irish Commissioner for farming is about to spend 150m Euro of your money paying people who are good at producing milk cheaply not to do th</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/30717479/which-does-the-uk-taxpayer-spend-more-on?post_id=549770869#549770869</link><description>.http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/newsroom/292_en.htmThe EU has decided that milk is too cheap, and thanks to an Irish Commissioner for farming is about to spend 150m Euro of your money paying people who are good at producing milk cheaply not to do th</description><pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2016 17:21:14 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Interesting stuff.What I noticed about the big, rich, arablwe farms of East Anglia was that there were many cases of one rich dude owning acres and acres with the actual farming left to "managers" or tenants plus the labourr force ( which was gratly</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/30717479/which-does-the-uk-taxpayer-spend-more-on?post_id=549506225#549506225</link><description>Interesting stuff.What I noticed about the big, rich, arablwe farms of East Anglia was that there were many cases of one rich dude owning acres and acres with the actual farming left to "managers" or tenants plus the labourr force ( which was gratly</description><pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 06:38:42 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I don't see what owning the land has to do with anything. If you owned a widget factory and the Government asked you to cease producing widgets for a year, you would seek financial compensation for doing so which is what set aside was. Set aside was</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/30717479/which-does-the-uk-taxpayer-spend-more-on?post_id=549498351#549498351</link><description>I don't see what owning the land has to do with anything. If you owned a widget factory and the Government asked you to cease producing widgets for a year, you would seek financial compensation for doing so which is what set aside was. Set aside was</description><pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2016 12:14:00 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>"Set aside was a policy for several years when certain crops were in surplus across the EU, but you only qualified for payment if you left some land fallow (so made no other income from it) and you had been growing those crops in previous years. And</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/30717479/which-does-the-uk-taxpayer-spend-more-on?post_id=549484685#549484685</link><description>"Set aside was a policy for several years when certain crops were in surplus across the EU, but you only qualified for payment if you left some land fallow (so made no other income from it) and you had been growing those crops in previous years. And</description><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2016 07:13:08 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>bongo, all farm "subsidies" or support stems from WW2 when food was rationed and food security was a vital part of any Government policy. We had a farm support policy from 1948 when a minimum price was negotiated for most products in order to avoid s</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/30717479/which-does-the-uk-taxpayer-spend-more-on?post_id=549484565#549484565</link><description>bongo, all farm "subsidies" or support stems from WW2 when food was rationed and food security was a vital part of any Government policy. We had a farm support policy from 1948 when a minimum price was negotiated for most products in order to avoid s</description><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2016 06:54:50 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Set aside was a policy for several years when certain crops were in surplus across the EU, but you only qualified for payment if you left some land fallow (so made no other income from it) and you had been growing those crops in previous years.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/30717479/which-does-the-uk-taxpayer-spend-more-on?post_id=549484509#549484509</link><description>Set aside was a policy for several years when certain crops were in surplus across the EU, but you only qualified for payment if you left some land fallow (so made no other income from it) and you had been growing those crops in previous years.</description><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2016 06:46:45 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>In the late 19th century the US President at the time said this when asked to provide hand outs for Texan farmers:I can find no warrant for such an appropriation in the Constitution, and I do not believe that the power and duty of the general governm</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/30717479/which-does-the-uk-taxpayer-spend-more-on?post_id=549480185#549480185</link><description>In the late 19th century the US President at the time said this when asked to provide hand outs for Texan farmers:I can find no warrant for such an appropriation in the Constitution, and I do not believe that the power and duty of the general governm</description><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 18:01:19 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I take your point, shaky. Finite is finite. Land is finite. We took the advice from the rulers and bought land. However, we still got evicted off our own land.That said, 'tis the best way to get as far from the Machine as possible, but the freedom is</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/30717479/which-does-the-uk-taxpayer-spend-more-on?post_id=549476519#549476519</link><description>I take your point, shaky. Finite is finite. Land is finite. We took the advice from the rulers and bought land. However, we still got evicted off our own land.That said, 'tis the best way to get as far from the Machine as possible, but the freedom is</description><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 13:19:10 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>The annual subsidy to EDF and other energy companies will be many times the total subsidies paid to farmers and these days, the only payments to farmers are for environmental reasons. Even at the height of the subsidies in the 70's and 80's there wer</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/30717479/which-does-the-uk-taxpayer-spend-more-on?post_id=549466289#549466289</link><description>The annual subsidy to EDF and other energy companies will be many times the total subsidies paid to farmers and these days, the only payments to farmers are for environmental reasons. Even at the height of the subsidies in the 70's and 80's there wer</description><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2016 14:26:38 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
