<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Sceptical at Turnout above 70%</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/30705529/sceptical-at-turnout-above-70</link><description>BF suggests between 70 -75% is most likely at 2.8. I think that is a Lay as there is a stubborn hardcore of the unwashed in this country who wouldn't vote even if there was a motion to ban Facebook. I work for a US software company where the average</description><item><title>London turnoutRichmond 82.1%Sutton 76%Merton 73.5%City 73%Wandsworth 72%Islington 70.4%Ealing 70.1%Lambeth 67.4%</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/30705529/sceptical-at-turnout-above-70?post_id=549119575#549119575</link><description>London turnoutRichmond 82.1%Sutton 76%Merton 73.5%City 73%Wandsworth 72%Islington 70.4%Ealing 70.1%Lambeth 67.4%</description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2016 19:31:06 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Turnout in number of mainland UK authorities declared so far ranging from 68% to 75%.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/30705529/sceptical-at-turnout-above-70?post_id=549116703#549116703</link><description>Turnout in number of mainland UK authorities declared so far ranging from 68% to 75%.</description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2016 17:22:59 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I did not dare ask her.But all I can say is that if MI5 turn up.She would send them off with a thick ear.I was thinking about the dastardly way Cameron has handled himself in this referendum &amp; it reminded me a little bit of the Referendum in the Blac</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/30705529/sceptical-at-turnout-above-70?post_id=549115505#549115505</link><description>I did not dare ask her.But all I can say is that if MI5 turn up.She would send them off with a thick ear.I was thinking about the dastardly way Cameron has handled himself in this referendum &amp; it reminded me a little bit of the Referendum in the Blac</description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:58:59 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>suppose the real question is what does dot think,</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/30705529/sceptical-at-turnout-above-70?post_id=549114927#549114927</link><description>suppose the real question is what does dot think,</description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:27:34 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Just been &amp; voted with my Wife &amp; In Laws another 4 more for Leave.Dot said that the Turnout was probably the highest she had ever knownDot = Lady in Polling station &amp; she's been doing it in our village for decades.Can it be that certain on staying ?.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/30705529/sceptical-at-turnout-above-70?post_id=549113851#549113851</link><description>Just been &amp; voted with my Wife &amp; In Laws another 4 more for Leave.Dot said that the Turnout was probably the highest she had ever knownDot = Lady in Polling station &amp; she's been doing it in our village for decades.Can it be that certain on staying ?.</description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2016 14:24:51 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>are tweeter feeds telling the truth23mRobert Jenrick&acirc;&#x80;&#x8F; @RobertJenrickTurnout 80% &amp; rising as voted in Southwell, Newark just now. I voted @StrongerIn for jobs, economic stability &amp; a strong voice in the world</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/30705529/sceptical-at-turnout-above-70?post_id=549113587#549113587</link><description>are tweeter feeds telling the truth23mRobert Jenrick&acirc;&#x80;&#x8F; @RobertJenrickTurnout 80% &amp; rising as voted in Southwell, Newark just now. I voted @StrongerIn for jobs, economic stability &amp; a strong voice in the world</description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2016 14:10:23 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>thanks for confirming my scepticism</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/30705529/sceptical-at-turnout-above-70?post_id=549113035#549113035</link><description>thanks for confirming my scepticism</description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2016 13:21:44 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>TCat, 1992 g/election 77.7% turnout, 1974feb 78.8% turnout. 2 turnouts since 1945 returned over 80%, 1950 83.9%. 1951 82.6%.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/30705529/sceptical-at-turnout-above-70?post_id=549112983#549112983</link><description>TCat, 1992 g/election 77.7% turnout, 1974feb 78.8% turnout. 2 turnouts since 1945 returned over 80%, 1950 83.9%. 1951 82.6%.</description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2016 13:13:46 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>if it is over 80% I'm calling for an enquiry</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/30705529/sceptical-at-turnout-above-70?post_id=549112861#549112861</link><description>if it is over 80% I'm calling for an enquiry</description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2016 13:04:46 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>odds for over 70% under 80% are shortening</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/30705529/sceptical-at-turnout-above-70?post_id=549112603#549112603</link><description>odds for over 70% under 80% are shortening</description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2016 12:30:09 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
