<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: EU court rejects child benefits challenge</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/30701863/eu-court-rejects-child-benefits-challenge</link><description>Challenge to UK's right to deny some EU migrants child benefit and child tax credits rejected by European judgesThey think it's all over..........it is now!</description><item><title>I still say ban working tax credits for new migrants.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/30701863/eu-court-rejects-child-benefits-challenge?post_id=549014959#549014959</link><description>I still say ban working tax credits for new migrants.</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 12:47:54 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>BurtThere is already a "habitual residence test" under EU law. The migrant needed to pass this to claim benefits.The test covers factors such as the duration of the migrant's stay; their activity, including their source of income if they are students</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/30701863/eu-court-rejects-child-benefits-challenge?post_id=549014937#549014937</link><description>BurtThere is already a "habitual residence test" under EU law. The migrant needed to pass this to claim benefits.The test covers factors such as the duration of the migrant's stay; their activity, including their source of income if they are students</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 12:46:19 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>On the surface it looks like wow, we actually got something.... when you scratch the surface its useless as per usual:"The European Court of Justice said it was lawful for the UK to withhold family benefits to EU migrants who were not working if they</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/30701863/eu-court-rejects-child-benefits-challenge?post_id=549014261#549014261</link><description>On the surface it looks like wow, we actually got something.... when you scratch the surface its useless as per usual:"The European Court of Justice said it was lawful for the UK to withhold family benefits to EU migrants who were not working if they</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 12:02:24 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Apparently it goes against EU membership to treat your own citizens more favourably than others.Looks like we have found an 'economically inactive' loophole. Lets see if other states follow suit.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/30701863/eu-court-rejects-child-benefits-challenge?post_id=549010825#549010825</link><description>Apparently it goes against EU membership to treat your own citizens more favourably than others.Looks like we have found an 'economically inactive' loophole. Lets see if other states follow suit.</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 07:45:22 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>can anyone tell me WHO exactly was against the british case was it the 500 million eu populationthe individual countries, or what body, apart from the commission???</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/30701863/eu-court-rejects-child-benefits-challenge?post_id=549010701#549010701</link><description>can anyone tell me WHO exactly was against the british case was it the 500 million eu populationthe individual countries, or what body, apart from the commission???</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 07:36:47 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Yes Mobo Let's not forget that.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/30701863/eu-court-rejects-child-benefits-challenge?post_id=549010665#549010665</link><description>Yes Mobo Let's not forget that.</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 07:33:58 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>THE EU WAS AGAINST!!!  that's what is worrying</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/30701863/eu-court-rejects-child-benefits-challenge?post_id=549010503#549010503</link><description>THE EU WAS AGAINST!!!  that's what is worrying</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 07:12:54 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Silly me, I should have realised that these European judges will start to concede toone or two of Camerons minor requests in order to try and save the EU'S bacon.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/30701863/eu-court-rejects-child-benefits-challenge?post_id=549010297#549010297</link><description>Silly me, I should have realised that these European judges will start to concede toone or two of Camerons minor requests in order to try and save the EU'S bacon.</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 06:47:49 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Doesn't work. Abolish it and reduce VAT... simples.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/30701863/eu-court-rejects-child-benefits-challenge?post_id=549010151#549010151</link><description>Doesn't work. Abolish it and reduce VAT... simples.</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 06:32:06 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>The idea of working tax credits was to encourage UK unemployed back into work, because low wages were not enticing enough.Tax Credits were not designed as an enticement for a foreign workforce. However they still qualify for them.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/30701863/eu-court-rejects-child-benefits-challenge?post_id=549009955#549009955</link><description>The idea of working tax credits was to encourage UK unemployed back into work, because low wages were not enticing enough.Tax Credits were not designed as an enticement for a foreign workforce. However they still qualify for them.</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 06:04:11 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
