New Posts For Thread: A new low for Toynbeehttps://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/30107143/a-new-low-for-toynbeeTwo poor children who die after a decade of Labour government in Labour councils before the coalition came to power...............and she somehow links it with Tory cuts in a headline?Disgraceful. I'm not sure I've seen a worse piece of journalism.hWasn't referring to you as wipe!https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/30107143/a-new-low-for-toynbee?post_id=535988469#535988469Wasn't referring to you as wipe!Wed, 16 Oct 2013 16:05:15 -0500If you are referring to me as thread originator, you'll see that in that Miliband thread I said the Mail was way out of line, you clueless mug.https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/30107143/a-new-low-for-toynbee?post_id=535941843#535941843If you are referring to me as thread originator, you'll see that in that Miliband thread I said the Mail was way out of line, you clueless mug.Mon, 14 Oct 2013 03:06:14 -0500The same sort of people on this thread slating the Guardian ,were excusing the Mail last week.,I also think Toynbee is Pathetic but you lot are just Tory hypocrites there to be laughed at !https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/30107143/a-new-low-for-toynbee?post_id=535932725#535932725The same sort of people on this thread slating the Guardian ,were excusing the Mail last week.,I also think Toynbee is Pathetic but you lot are just Tory hypocrites there to be laughed at !Sun, 13 Oct 2013 11:17:31 -0500https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/30107143/a-new-low-for-toynbee?post_id=535932623#535932623Sun, 13 Oct 2013 11:12:28 -0500they sure moved it of the front page when they saw the response !!!https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/30107143/a-new-low-for-toynbee?post_id=535926873#535926873they sure moved it of the front page when they saw the response !!!Sun, 13 Oct 2013 04:54:03 -0500It reflects badly on the Guardian and for her to say she didn't provide the headline but didnt,apparently object to it at first, is pathetic.https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/30107143/a-new-low-for-toynbee?post_id=535919111#535919111It reflects badly on the Guardian and for her to say she didn't provide the headline but didnt,apparently object to it at first, is pathetic.Sat, 12 Oct 2013 14:51:11 -0500The headline does however seem to have nothing to do with the piece written by Polly Filler.It's about further cuts and I really don't see why these 2 children were named in the headline.It appears that the Guardian wish to go down the sensationalisthttps://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/30107143/a-new-low-for-toynbee?post_id=535908063#535908063The headline does however seem to have nothing to do with the piece written by Polly Filler.It's about further cuts and I really don't see why these 2 children were named in the headline.It appears that the Guardian wish to go down the sensationalistSat, 12 Oct 2013 05:52:09 -0500The name Polly Tonybee angers me but i don't know whyShe must have said something in the past to piss me offIs she a bit sexist?https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/30107143/a-new-low-for-toynbee?post_id=535901625#535901625The name Polly Tonybee angers me but i don't know whyShe must have said something in the past to piss me offIs she a bit sexist?Fri, 11 Oct 2013 16:00:29 -0500Seriously Karla - a female journalist writes an outrageous headline and critisism is not allowed in your world because that would be misogynistic? What a woeful poster you are.https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/30107143/a-new-low-for-toynbee?post_id=535895005#535895005Seriously Karla - a female journalist writes an outrageous headline and critisism is not allowed in your world because that would be misogynistic? What a woeful poster you are.Fri, 11 Oct 2013 10:34:18 -0500"Toynbee is nearly as rum as Dianne Abbott"D.A. on QT last night seem to be making the excuse that the reason core (English/Maths) educational standards had plummeted under Labour was because of a concentration on skills to get people into universityhttps://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/30107143/a-new-low-for-toynbee?post_id=535894717#535894717"Toynbee is nearly as rum as Dianne Abbott"D.A. on QT last night seem to be making the excuse that the reason core (English/Maths) educational standards had plummeted under Labour was because of a concentration on skills to get people into universityFri, 11 Oct 2013 10:17:53 -0500