<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: No lover of Thatcher but</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/29851521/no-lover-of-thatcher-but</link><description>Listening to some people complaining about what she did to this country.lets not forget that without the hard left taking over the unions she would never have been in power.The only reason people voted for her was her tough stance in the first place,</description><item><title>Mick - A coalition SDP/Lib had a rating approaching 50%No it didn't.Not at all Mick, it seems that at their peak  libs/ sdp hat 50% in one poll. There are some snakey coonts on here. Make your mind up</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/29851521/no-lover-of-thatcher-but?post_id=531134425#531134425</link><description>Mick - A coalition SDP/Lib had a rating approaching 50%No it didn't.Not at all Mick, it seems that at their peak  libs/ sdp hat 50% in one poll. There are some snakey coonts on here. Make your mind up</description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 14:17:08 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Not at all Mick, it seems that at their peak  libs/ sdp hat 50% in one poll. I have never heard anybody claim Roy Jenkins would have been PM  without the Falklands. The normal leftie argument is that Labour would have beat Thatcher, after all SDp/Lib</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/29851521/no-lover-of-thatcher-but?post_id=531133343#531133343</link><description>Not at all Mick, it seems that at their peak  libs/ sdp hat 50% in one poll. I have never heard anybody claim Roy Jenkins would have been PM  without the Falklands. The normal leftie argument is that Labour would have beat Thatcher, after all SDp/Lib</description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 13:35:58 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>we will never know wurzel.What we do know is opposition parties regularly poll well mid term but fail to convert the poll ratings into votes.The reality of that election was the Alliance polled almost the same percentage vote as labour but 186 seats</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/29851521/no-lover-of-thatcher-but?post_id=531133267#531133267</link><description>we will never know wurzel.What we do know is opposition parties regularly poll well mid term but fail to convert the poll ratings into votes.The reality of that election was the Alliance polled almost the same percentage vote as labour but 186 seats</description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 13:33:19 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>My point Captain.But there is no arguing with someone who refuses to believe that the Alliance polled 50% even when proofed the evidence. There is some evidence that Mrs Thatcher's Falklands policy and defence spending led to the 'invasion' by Argent</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/29851521/no-lover-of-thatcher-but?post_id=531131225#531131225</link><description>My point Captain.But there is no arguing with someone who refuses to believe that the Alliance polled 50% even when proofed the evidence. There is some evidence that Mrs Thatcher's Falklands policy and defence spending led to the 'invasion' by Argent</description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 12:01:27 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Take out the ' Falklands factor ' MW and a hung parliament was not out of the question - that would have been the end of Thatcher.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/29851521/no-lover-of-thatcher-but?post_id=531130985#531130985</link><description>Take out the ' Falklands factor ' MW and a hung parliament was not out of the question - that would have been the end of Thatcher.</description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 11:53:42 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Mick you are presuming that poll ratings 2 - 3 years from an election would lead to votes on election day.It isn't unsual mid term for opposition parties to poll well but fail to convert them into votes.In the 83 election the alliance party got 25.4%</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/29851521/no-lover-of-thatcher-but?post_id=531130693#531130693</link><description>Mick you are presuming that poll ratings 2 - 3 years from an election would lead to votes on election day.It isn't unsual mid term for opposition parties to poll well but fail to convert them into votes.In the 83 election the alliance party got 25.4%</description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 11:43:49 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Would have been Jenkins, he was ' Prime Minister Designate'. Could have happened, they were very close to breaking the mouldof two party politics - didn't happen, all water under the bridge now.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/29851521/no-lover-of-thatcher-but?post_id=531130149#531130149</link><description>Would have been Jenkins, he was ' Prime Minister Designate'. Could have happened, they were very close to breaking the mouldof two party politics - didn't happen, all water under the bridge now.</description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 11:23:43 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Mick so are you saying that without the Falklands the David Steel or Roy Jenkins (rather than Foot) would have been Prime Minister.I've never heard anybody claim that before.They managed 23 seats so only 303 seats short of a majority.Unlucky - I can</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/29851521/no-lover-of-thatcher-but?post_id=531129211#531129211</link><description>Mick so are you saying that without the Falklands the David Steel or Roy Jenkins (rather than Foot) would have been Prime Minister.I've never heard anybody claim that before.They managed 23 seats so only 303 seats short of a majority.Unlucky - I can</description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 10:55:06 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>It was easy to verify.http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/voting-intention-1979-1983                             Survey End Date    CON (%)    LAB (%)    LIB/SDP (%)    Con LeadScroll down to Gallup/Telegraph    1981-12-14    23    23.5    50.5            -</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/29851521/no-lover-of-thatcher-but?post_id=531128623#531128623</link><description>It was easy to verify.http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/voting-intention-1979-1983                             Survey End Date    CON (%)    LAB (%)    LIB/SDP (%)    Con LeadScroll down to Gallup/Telegraph    1981-12-14    23    23.5    50.5            -</description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 10:36:59 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>So you post some bollox,I disagree so you start to be offensive.Is that It? Idiot.Bye then.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/29851521/no-lover-of-thatcher-but?post_id=531127927#531127927</link><description>So you post some bollox,I disagree so you start to be offensive.Is that It? Idiot.Bye then.</description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 10:15:06 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
