<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Obama shoe-in</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/29467975/obama-shoe-in</link><description>Of course I could be wrong. I NEVER post predictions like this. I studdied US Politics for my degree back in the early 90's. It takes a lot to remove an incumbant President and to my mind the uncertain nature of the US' place in the world order plays</description><item><title>anyone would look dreamy standing next to chris christie</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/29467975/obama-shoe-in?post_id=525700897#525700897</link><description>anyone would look dreamy standing next to chris christie</description><pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 06:40:36 -0500</pubDate></item><item><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/29467975/obama-shoe-in?post_id=525672005#525672005</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 08:25:35 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>You clearly didn't see how dreamy he looked in his windbreaker. Real presidential like.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/29467975/obama-shoe-in?post_id=525671941#525671941</link><description>You clearly didn't see how dreamy he looked in his windbreaker. Real presidential like.</description><pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 08:22:40 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Shows how phucking stupid people are, a storm blows a few buildings down, Obama goes and has a look and his popularity rises.Mainly because he'll do what politicians are good at, spend billions more</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/29467975/obama-shoe-in?post_id=525671823#525671823</link><description>Shows how phucking stupid people are, a storm blows a few buildings down, Obama goes and has a look and his popularity rises.Mainly because he'll do what politicians are good at, spend billions more</description><pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 08:18:44 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>And for the Obama naysayers, even Republicans are in love with him now:  http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1012/83123.html?hp=l1</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/29467975/obama-shoe-in?post_id=525671411#525671411</link><description>And for the Obama naysayers, even Republicans are in love with him now:  http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1012/83123.html?hp=l1</description><pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 08:02:21 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Hispanics and whatnot aside, back to the OP.   Yes, Obama will most likely win. Praise be Sandy. She seems to have sealed the deal.  Plus, Romney is an intolerable little prick.   But it's not free money. If it were, your lowly bet would be less, um,</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/29467975/obama-shoe-in?post_id=525671169#525671169</link><description>Hispanics and whatnot aside, back to the OP.   Yes, Obama will most likely win. Praise be Sandy. She seems to have sealed the deal.  Plus, Romney is an intolerable little prick.   But it's not free money. If it were, your lowly bet would be less, um,</description><pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 07:51:43 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>"Hey Crip, tell me, pragmatically, how being governed from Westminster as opposed to Brussels actually, materially, affect you."Don't you even read?  The point is it isn't an either/or question.  It is having one or both.  The less utterly useless co</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/29467975/obama-shoe-in?post_id=525667291#525667291</link><description>"Hey Crip, tell me, pragmatically, how being governed from Westminster as opposed to Brussels actually, materially, affect you."Don't you even read?  The point is it isn't an either/or question.  It is having one or both.  The less utterly useless co</description><pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 04:05:34 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>"Using phrases such as 'the arguement of an imbecile' really doesn't show you in a good light. In fact it mearly suggests you struggle to argue on fact rather than prejudice."Sorry - let me me clarify as we seem to have got off on the wrong foot.  I</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/29467975/obama-shoe-in?post_id=525667277#525667277</link><description>"Using phrases such as 'the arguement of an imbecile' really doesn't show you in a good light. In fact it mearly suggests you struggle to argue on fact rather than prejudice."Sorry - let me me clarify as we seem to have got off on the wrong foot.  I</description><pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 04:03:35 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>how being governed from Westminster as opposed to Brussels actually, materially, affect you.That's none of your business I win every time.Your last couple of sentences indicate that you don't think it matters who governs.I take it you do vote?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/29467975/obama-shoe-in?post_id=525659165#525659165</link><description>how being governed from Westminster as opposed to Brussels actually, materially, affect you.That's none of your business I win every time.Your last couple of sentences indicate that you don't think it matters who governs.I take it you do vote?</description><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:36:47 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I think the argument that all people on benefits vote for the person who gives them the most is flawed.Whilst there are some happy on benefits many people who are aspire to more.People may vote democrat/labour initially because they see them as provi</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/politics/go/thread/view/94150/29467975/obama-shoe-in?post_id=525658909#525658909</link><description>I think the argument that all people on benefits vote for the person who gives them the most is flawed.Whilst there are some happy on benefits many people who are aspire to more.People may vote democrat/labour initially because they see them as provi</description><pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:29:43 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
