By:
I'll take bets, 4-6 Mandy, Evens Builder...
Nice % book ;) |
By:
and mandy is still value :D
|
By:
evens builder what drugs u taking tonight lol
|
By:
actually i think the points structure is rubbish and is typical of a feeble minded donk.......
just 3 points for being in the top 3 of an mtt? needs ammending... this isn't me backing out.... just tweaking. |
By:
an independent arbitrator should be in charge of the points weighting.
ariston? |
By:
loser banned from the forum until January?
|
By:
how about a permiban?
|
By:
ariston? lol
i can only imagine how many buckets of KFC those 2 have shared while discussing the finer points of $10 stts |
By:
Yes i like that builder.
HU4FORUMZ |
By:
listen you inbred fkwit - top 3 wont affect you at all
and call me a feeble minded donk again and it will be your ugly mug that gets tweaked and that is 1.01 |
By:
:^0
|
By:
canary - think the points have already been agreed:
thebuilder86. 26 Oct 18:27 deal seems to be clear acceptance of the challenge under the terms it was offered. |
By:
its not about the money.
its about the prize which of you**s is the biggest? |
By:
This will run and run. :D
|
By:
RUMBLE
|
By:
Think Builder will get destroyed.
|
By:
Imho I believe it should be:
3 Points for longest lasting. 2 Points for cashing (since they're both good players then they should both be cashing hence lasting longer should be worth more imho.) 6 Points for final tabling and finishing 9th. 7 for 8th 8 for 7th 9 for 6th 10 for 5th 11 for 4th 13 for 3rd 15 for 2nd 20 for 1st. :) |
By:
and EWS? wtf? remove that... lol..
i was 6 tabling when i agreed... hence why i only typed a one word post which is uncharacteristic compared to my usual virtual eloquence... (google it you northern simpleton) |
By:
virtual eloquence is right too...
and I'm not a northern simpleton tyvm I'm a southern genius and I've got a certificate to prove it :D |
By:
chilin, there can't be massive variation between events.
|
By:
chillin has a nice structure there........
to have him bust out on the 1st level and me go on to win an mtt and only win 4 points is crazy... |
By:
Second prize in this may well become the cornerstone of Builder's poker C.V.
|
By:
i didn't mean you dibble :)
|
By:
i know ;)
|
By:
Builder is a clown if he accepts this.
This challenge is a rocks dream. |
By:
I just gave my opinion canary, personally I think that if one person is last and the other first then to only have a 4 point difference is madness.
I thought mine seemed fairer and there was reasoning behind it :) |
By:
EWS should defo be a part of it
|
By:
1.01 it never goes the distance.
|
By:
1.25 it never starts
|
By:
and the same with the stts...
him to finish 9th and me to win in 1st is worth more than one point. solid organisation skills again.... will we wait for the hungover before we start 2 hours late? |
By:
yeah i know but you could have someone winning a couple of multis and not much else winning the challenge despite getting pwned in everything else.
the different disciplines need to be evenly weighted. like the decathlon. |
By:
Why is a contest needed?
Mandylou is a decent player, Builder isn't, end of. |
By:
builder does have a similar perm to daley thompson actually...
|
By:
Mandylou is a very nice bloke, Builder is a ginormous runt.
|
By:
TBF to Builder, it was proposed a poker challenge between the two individuals.
For such a challenge HU over a certain number of hours/hands is certainly the fairest. Any challenge involving multis is a joke. Twice as much when between these individuals. I still reckon it should be best of 5 roshambo on UB. |
By:
ginormous runt is a contradiction in terms
|
By:
what...like this?
http://i230.photobucket.com/albums/ee46/urchinlfc/builder.jpg |
By:
not when runt means something beginning with c...
|
By:
who is this**
http://i230.photobucket.com/albums/ee46/urchinlfc/builder.jpg |