Poker
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
27 Jan 10
13:37
Joined:
Date Joined:
29 Sep 09
www.realdealpoker.com
Show More
Launch Date of RealDealPoker
RealdealPoker is expected to launch by the end of March 2010, so we are only a little over 6 weeks away from launch. Once we have an exact launch date we will be making this publicly known and you can be assured that you our players will be the first to have the information.
We have seen huge numbers of sign ups to our current
RealdealPoker is expected to launch by the end of March 2010, so we are only a little over 6 weeks away from launch. Once we have an exact launch date we will be making this publicly known and you can be assured that you our players will be the first to have the information.
We have seen huge numbers of sign ups to our current
Love the idea of being able to have games audited for a small fee.
Although don't think it's wise to use it often the fact that its offered gives some level of assurance.
Although don't think it's wise to use it often the fact that its offered gives some level of assurance.
Seems like a bit of a gimmick,it prob will appeal to the, its all a**crowd, but in reality it seems it could be less secure than the traditional methods.Bit nice idear gl with it.
ASTOUNDING IDEA... REAL CARDS... REAL SHUFFLES
I'M IN...
I don't trust rng software... never have!!!
Good Luck
Think you are on a BIG WINNER !
I'M IN...
I don't trust rng software... never have!!!
Good Luck
Think you are on a BIG WINNER !
are u going to get less hands/hr than a normal online site? (ex PKR)
It doesn't look to be trying to attract serious players- only the 'it's all rigged brigade'.
how are they going to produce 1000s of hands required? will be slow as.
Very interesting idea. This will either be a massive hit or a massive failure. A lot of fish could flock there in the hope that they can now win online.
this has so many faults its untrue.
- 2yrs late imo - if not more
- only gunna bring in losing fish who think they are good.. after a couple of weeks (when they still lose - cos they cant see they are sh1t) they will leave and will find something to blame.
- too slow
- millions of people play just fine on stars**/ipoker. u really arent going to convince them to move across.
- you dont accept US players
- too slow dealing times
overall 1/10
- 2yrs late imo - if not more
- only gunna bring in losing fish who think they are good.. after a couple of weeks (when they still lose - cos they cant see they are sh1t) they will leave and will find something to blame.
- too slow
- millions of people play just fine on stars**/ipoker. u really arent going to convince them to move across.
- you dont accept US players
- too slow dealing times
overall 1/10
too slow. Will only attract idiots. Will not do**
Bulls*it... cards are shuffled and scanned into memory very quickly then its just played like any other site...
The more fish that sign up the better.
:)
The more fish that sign up the better.
:)
Full marks for the principle behind it - BUT
if hands are pre recorded ...my cabbages gracious me - could it possibly lead to suggestions of it being rigged??!! After all you only need to rig one hand a day to make a living!
And if a mis-deal occurs - machine jams or for some phenominal reason an extra ace is added to the pack?
I personally think, it will make more people realise just how realistic true online poker is - if its all rigged, then why do good players generally do well across on any online site?
Its like reinventing the wheel, but instead of adding ball bearings, you decide to shape it like a triangle!
if hands are pre recorded ...my cabbages gracious me - could it possibly lead to suggestions of it being rigged??!! After all you only need to rig one hand a day to make a living!
And if a mis-deal occurs - machine jams or for some phenominal reason an extra ace is added to the pack?
I personally think, it will make more people realise just how realistic true online poker is - if its all rigged, then why do good players generally do well across on any online site?
Its like reinventing the wheel, but instead of adding ball bearings, you decide to shape it like a triangle!
One thing for sure is that people will still be on the forums etc, Crying about how online poker is fixed when they lose
It happens everywhere and always will
Losers will always come up with some sad excuse, lol
It happens everywhere and always will
Losers will always come up with some sad excuse, lol
What and leave the house,ar you carzy theirs pople out there.
jamesbeckton. 27 Jan 16:09
It doesn't look to be trying to attract serious players- only the 'it's all rigged brigade'.
so the site will have a million regulars :-)
It doesn't look to be trying to attract serious players- only the 'it's all rigged brigade'.
so the site will have a million regulars :-)
This is a good example of misunderstanding the problem before engineering a solution.
The problem with current systems isn't random number generation, but peoples perceptions of random number generation. The designers have attempted to engineer a mechanical solution to a social problem. This will ultimately be born out because the actual underlying problem isn't being addressed, merely masked. It's like treating a brain tumour with painkillers.
What will happen is that the company are left with a mechanical solution in a digital world. From a technological Darwinism point of view, the system is inferior (*) and cannot thrive in the market place.
*1. A mechanical shuffler cannot operate at the same speed as a digitial shuffler
2. Mechanical failure rates are higher than digital failure rates
Fail
The problem with current systems isn't random number generation, but peoples perceptions of random number generation. The designers have attempted to engineer a mechanical solution to a social problem. This will ultimately be born out because the actual underlying problem isn't being addressed, merely masked. It's like treating a brain tumour with painkillers.
What will happen is that the company are left with a mechanical solution in a digital world. From a technological Darwinism point of view, the system is inferior (*) and cannot thrive in the market place.
*1. A mechanical shuffler cannot operate at the same speed as a digitial shuffler
2. Mechanical failure rates are higher than digital failure rates
Fail
I agree with everything bluffdaddy has said and thought this as soon as I saw it in a magazine a couple of weeks ago...and what about hands being produced before they're released for dealing? There'll surely be some integrity concerns that these will be available to *somebody* to view somewhere, making the whole idea pointless.
to get my thrill heart pumping buzz from poker I need to play a lot higher stakes than I do live, why is this?
serious addons to make the site a winner
1. cards with naked ladies on them
2. cards with naked ladies (vintage) for the older players e.g. supergeil and hennigan1
BTW cat see that catsix ran another monster at 66/1 - told you it had some ability :)
1. cards with naked ladies on them
2. cards with naked ladies (vintage) for the older players e.g. supergeil and hennigan1
BTW cat see that catsix ran another monster at 66/1 - told you it had some ability :)
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539