<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Genuine question ...</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/poker/go/thread/view/94146/28287085/genuine-question</link><description>SITUATION IS: $54 game, Level 1- blinds 10/20You are holding 99. Most players are on starting stacks of 3000, and it is a FreezeoutPRE-FLOPsalap69 raises to 80, k0elh calls 80, Harryments calls 80, YOU call 80, dottore02 calls 80, Kakaschi_x calls 80</description><item><title>Interesting.Your wrong about me playing $2 games, in fact your just wrong.HTH</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/poker/go/thread/view/94146/28287085/genuine-question?post_id=507018105#507018105</link><description>Interesting.Your wrong about me playing $2 games, in fact your just wrong.HTH</description><pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 13:11:32 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I don't mean you play $2 games I mean in $2 games generally !</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/poker/go/thread/view/94146/28287085/genuine-question?post_id=507015415#507015415</link><description>I don't mean you play $2 games I mean in $2 games generally !</description><pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 12:17:49 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Beyond poor HF.  Maybe people go all in with AQ in the $2 games you play but they don't in $50+Will clearly be behind with 99.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/poker/go/thread/view/94146/28287085/genuine-question?post_id=507015337#507015337</link><description>Beyond poor HF.  Maybe people go all in with AQ in the $2 games you play but they don't in $50+Will clearly be behind with 99.</description><pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 12:16:17 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>The odds are hugely different in that the AJ will rarely be ahead where as your 999 will be.If you are frightened of the three yet to play then you are mental because a) They are still unlikely to hold TJ b) Even if they do then you now have the corr</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/poker/go/thread/view/94146/28287085/genuine-question?post_id=507014457#507014457</link><description>The odds are hugely different in that the AJ will rarely be ahead where as your 999 will be.If you are frightened of the three yet to play then you are mental because a) They are still unlikely to hold TJ b) Even if they do then you now have the corr</description><pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 11:58:44 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I was being sarcastic. It's a great post. Of course you should fold 99 in this situation.  HF seems to be new to poker.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/poker/go/thread/view/94146/28287085/genuine-question?post_id=507005413#507005413</link><description>I was being sarcastic. It's a great post. Of course you should fold 99 in this situation.  HF seems to be new to poker.</description><pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 08:24:07 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>HF - firstly, this has not a hand about me, its about whether or not a guy holding 99 on a Q98 flop should call for his tournament bearing in mind: 1)There are 4 other players still in the pot, and one already all in committed.  2) We are still on le</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/poker/go/thread/view/94146/28287085/genuine-question?post_id=507005185#507005185</link><description>HF - firstly, this has not a hand about me, its about whether or not a guy holding 99 on a Q98 flop should call for his tournament bearing in mind: 1)There are 4 other players still in the pot, and one already all in committed.  2) We are still on le</description><pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 08:18:48 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>possibly the worst thread ever on the poker forum</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/poker/go/thread/view/94146/28287085/genuine-question?post_id=507004359#507004359</link><description>possibly the worst thread ever on the poker forum</description><pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 07:55:38 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>All well and good giving the A7 v AK analogy as you know that JT was out in the hand and therefore that slants your thinking, the guy with his 9's doesnt know the TJ is out there and has to call.In a $50 tourney in that situation with 99 you are goin</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/poker/go/thread/view/94146/28287085/genuine-question?post_id=507004085#507004085</link><description>All well and good giving the A7 v AK analogy as you know that JT was out in the hand and therefore that slants your thinking, the guy with his 9's doesnt know the TJ is out there and has to call.In a $50 tourney in that situation with 99 you are goin</description><pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 07:48:15 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>This is the actual way the hand played out. I tweaked it a bit as the player holding 99 tanked before making the call to my all in. PRE-FLOPsalap69 raises to 80, The Klup calls 80, Harryments calls 80, k0elh calls 80, dottore02 calls 80, Kakaschi_x c</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/poker/go/thread/view/94146/28287085/genuine-question?post_id=506999999#506999999</link><description>This is the actual way the hand played out. I tweaked it a bit as the player holding 99 tanked before making the call to my all in. PRE-FLOPsalap69 raises to 80, The Klup calls 80, Harryments calls 80, k0elh calls 80, dottore02 calls 80, Kakaschi_x c</description><pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 05:31:44 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Its quite a tough decision - probably one that depends on situation i guess. If this was a life changing decision, i suppose you would have to fold, but for a $54 daily game, its a call. Statistically / % wise is it any different to calling an all in</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/poker/go/thread/view/94146/28287085/genuine-question?post_id=506999757#506999757</link><description>Its quite a tough decision - probably one that depends on situation i guess. If this was a life changing decision, i suppose you would have to fold, but for a $54 daily game, its a call. Statistically / % wise is it any different to calling an all in</description><pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 05:22:02 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
