<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Betfair Question and Answer  Session ( August 2011)</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/poker/go/thread/view/94146/28231255/betfair-question-and-answer-session-august-2011</link><description>At long last I can publish 80% of the report from last weeks meeting at BF HQ in Hammersmith which myself and Thrappers (Helmuthian Folds) attended last Friday on behalf of the forum. Both myself and HF took a day off work to attend and the only free</description><item><title>Why all the cloak and dagger over the cakeback?  If you have money being paid into your account then surely you have a legal right to know why and also how this money was calculated!  I do not know much about the legal in's and out's but one would th</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/poker/go/thread/view/94146/28231255/betfair-question-and-answer-session-august-2011?post_id=506179895#506179895</link><description>Why all the cloak and dagger over the cakeback?  If you have money being paid into your account then surely you have a legal right to know why and also how this money was calculated!  I do not know much about the legal in's and out's but one would th</description><pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 08:24:52 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>keith 100% betfair will have paid out less rb! So this huge fish loses each time he plays his 1 table 1 hour a week. Which puts him on the lowestt vipclub level! So i guess thats like 10%rb maybe.... And to justify that all the regs get 10-15% less :</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/poker/go/thread/view/94146/28231255/betfair-question-and-answer-session-august-2011?post_id=506160639#506160639</link><description>keith 100% betfair will have paid out less rb! So this huge fish loses each time he plays his 1 table 1 hour a week. Which puts him on the lowestt vipclub level! So i guess thats like 10%rb maybe.... And to justify that all the regs get 10-15% less :</description><pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 18:42:19 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>ok so i got more than i thought raked minimum 585&Acirc;&pound; (could be more as i mighta plyed on other comp but cant reemember) and i got 125quid rb! so thats about 20% rb... Now that would be ok if i was winning alot but i havent been! And i dont mind the sy</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/poker/go/thread/view/94146/28231255/betfair-question-and-answer-session-august-2011?post_id=506160533#506160533</link><description>ok so i got more than i thought raked minimum 585&Acirc;&pound; (could be more as i mighta plyed on other comp but cant reemember) and i got 125quid rb! so thats about 20% rb... Now that would be ok if i was winning alot but i havent been! And i dont mind the sy</description><pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 18:39:22 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>i wish they would ban hem and alike.it would b much more of a game of skill again.online poker aint a skill game of cards any more, its who can read data better and transfer that to makin the right decision.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/poker/go/thread/view/94146/28231255/betfair-question-and-answer-session-august-2011?post_id=506159341#506159341</link><description>i wish they would ban hem and alike.it would b much more of a game of skill again.online poker aint a skill game of cards any more, its who can read data better and transfer that to makin the right decision.</description><pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 18:04:24 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Surely if they want to protect fish, wouldn't it make sense to ban hem and sharkscope?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/poker/go/thread/view/94146/28231255/betfair-question-and-answer-session-august-2011?post_id=506158999#506158999</link><description>Surely if they want to protect fish, wouldn't it make sense to ban hem and sharkscope?</description><pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 17:55:06 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>sorry that should be The trouble with essence is the lack of transparency and how do you go about checking its correctI understand the principle and its fine, however I would like to know have betfair paid out more or less rake (since the introductio</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/poker/go/thread/view/94146/28231255/betfair-question-and-answer-session-august-2011?post_id=506158851#506158851</link><description>sorry that should be The trouble with essence is the lack of transparency and how do you go about checking its correctI understand the principle and its fine, however I would like to know have betfair paid out more or less rake (since the introductio</description><pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 17:51:01 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>sorry that should be The trouble with essence is the lack of transparency and how do you go about checking its correctI understand the principle and its fine, however I would like to know have betfair paid out more or less rake (since the introductio</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/poker/go/thread/view/94146/28231255/betfair-question-and-answer-session-august-2011?post_id=506158843#506158843</link><description>sorry that should be The trouble with essence is the lack of transparency and how do you go about checking its correctI understand the principle and its fine, however I would like to know have betfair paid out more or less rake (since the introductio</description><pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 17:50:55 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>The trouble with essence is the lack of transparency and how do you go about checking its correctI understand the principle and its fine, however I would like to know have betfair paid out more or less rake and how do we know our cake is correct</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/poker/go/thread/view/94146/28231255/betfair-question-and-answer-session-august-2011?post_id=506158759#506158759</link><description>The trouble with essence is the lack of transparency and how do you go about checking its correctI understand the principle and its fine, however I would like to know have betfair paid out more or less rake and how do we know our cake is correct</description><pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 17:49:29 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>think u willfind what spackers says is fairly accurate.ongame admitted as much at the gambing fair /conference early this year.can b as much as 90/10the split if a top player isin potv a big fish.jessie may also wrote an intrasting arcticle about ess</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/poker/go/thread/view/94146/28231255/betfair-question-and-answer-session-august-2011?post_id=506157653#506157653</link><description>think u willfind what spackers says is fairly accurate.ongame admitted as much at the gambing fair /conference early this year.can b as much as 90/10the split if a top player isin potv a big fish.jessie may also wrote an intrasting arcticle about ess</description><pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 17:26:24 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I think this would be a good example to take to betfair and get some sort of explanation.Spackers you have me on MSN so you have my email address so send me all the relevant details and I will chase it up for you and hopefully get some form of explan</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/poker/go/thread/view/94146/28231255/betfair-question-and-answer-session-august-2011?post_id=506150395#506150395</link><description>I think this would be a good example to take to betfair and get some sort of explanation.Spackers you have me on MSN so you have my email address so send me all the relevant details and I will chase it up for you and hopefully get some form of explan</description><pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 14:45:16 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
