<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Analysis of hand histories</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/poker/go/thread/view/94146/23653670/analysis-of-hand-histories</link><description>Can anyone help me here?I have analysed the last 10000 hands I was dealt by betfair. In a heads up situation one would expect the proportion of hands won to average out at 0.5.Since luck also plays a part there is a standard deviation around the 0.5.</description><item><title>This is ridiculous lol. Worst, most tilt enducing thread of all time?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/poker/go/thread/view/94146/23653670/analysis-of-hand-histories?post_id=423921862#423921862</link><description>This is ridiculous lol. Worst, most tilt enducing thread of all time?</description><pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 20:21:54 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Peter Parkers brother 13 Dec 19:13 wykhamist The point is: What is a reasonable spread around 0.5 for a given number of hands. If this is your question - What is a reasonable spread around 0.5 for a given number of random hands. Then your answers</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/poker/go/thread/view/94146/23653670/analysis-of-hand-histories?post_id=423921846#423921846</link><description>Peter Parkers brother 13 Dec 19:13 wykhamist The point is: What is a reasonable spread around 0.5 for a given number of hands. If this is your question - What is a reasonable spread around 0.5 for a given number of random hands. Then your answers</description><pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 16:35:18 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>A training site i was a member of developed something they called puf , it was unajusted pre flop luck factor, it was very interesting to see in your mtt if u had been getting better than ave cards,the suprising thing was often you had above ave hand</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/poker/go/thread/view/94146/23653670/analysis-of-hand-histories?post_id=423921838#423921838</link><description>A training site i was a member of developed something they called puf , it was unajusted pre flop luck factor, it was very interesting to see in your mtt if u had been getting better than ave cards,the suprising thing was often you had above ave hand</description><pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 16:26:53 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Jeezers, this is all a bit above me. Feel quite thick.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/poker/go/thread/view/94146/23653670/analysis-of-hand-histories?post_id=423921834#423921834</link><description>Jeezers, this is all a bit above me. Feel quite thick.</description><pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 16:25:39 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>ok if you want to do this on a binomial distribution method you have to consider there are 169 different starting hands. also count in the fact that some of those starting hands are more likely to appear than others. there is a simple calculation for</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/poker/go/thread/view/94146/23653670/analysis-of-hand-histories?post_id=423921830#423921830</link><description>ok if you want to do this on a binomial distribution method you have to consider there are 169 different starting hands. also count in the fact that some of those starting hands are more likely to appear than others. there is a simple calculation for</description><pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 16:22:57 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Um Mavis In a binomial distribution it is one of the variables.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/poker/go/thread/view/94146/23653670/analysis-of-hand-histories?post_id=423921826#423921826</link><description>Um Mavis In a binomial distribution it is one of the variables.</description><pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 16:13:29 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>lol how on earth can you take into account the sample size in your computations?!</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/poker/go/thread/view/94146/23653670/analysis-of-hand-histories?post_id=423921822#423921822</link><description>lol how on earth can you take into account the sample size in your computations?!</description><pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 16:05:21 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Jeez I just give up. I have said already that I am not using my 10K samples to deduce anything about the system as a whole, or about whether I am playing well or badly.I was using it to see if there was bias in the hole cards I was getting dealt.I ha</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/poker/go/thread/view/94146/23653670/analysis-of-hand-histories?post_id=423921818#423921818</link><description>Jeez I just give up. I have said already that I am not using my 10K samples to deduce anything about the system as a whole, or about whether I am playing well or badly.I was using it to see if there was bias in the hole cards I was getting dealt.I ha</description><pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 15:55:52 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>You been on the sauce .. hic... ariston?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/poker/go/thread/view/94146/23653670/analysis-of-hand-histories?post_id=423921770#423921770</link><description>You been on the sauce .. hic... ariston?</description><pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 14:43:57 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>simple dynamic*</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/poker/go/thread/view/94146/23653670/analysis-of-hand-histories?post_id=423921766#423921766</link><description>simple dynamic*</description><pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 14:34:06 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
