<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: do i have to call??</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/poker/go/thread/view/94146/23649270/do-i-have-to-call</link><description>4 orbits played, villain is loose passive, no 3bets yet (~30/15/0.5)0/2 folding to cont betsSeat 1 is the buttonSeat 1: villain ( $208.80 USD )Seat 2: sb ( $380.60 USD )Seat 3: bb ( $83.00 USD )Seat 4: UTG ( $49.95 USD )Seat 6: hero ( $273.65 USD )sb</description><item><title>exactly a riston, i only need to win 25%, but am i winning against a passive players raise here that often? imo depends on whether he thinks any two pair is the nuts.there are plenty of players where it's an easy fold and i wouldn't give it a second</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/poker/go/thread/view/94146/23649270/do-i-have-to-call?post_id=423849958#423849958</link><description>exactly a riston, i only need to win 25%, but am i winning against a passive players raise here that often? imo depends on whether he thinks any two pair is the nuts.there are plenty of players where it's an easy fold and i wouldn't give it a second</description><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 08:36:55 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>FOLD AND RELOAD HAHAHA YEP</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/poker/go/thread/view/94146/23649270/do-i-have-to-call?post_id=423849942#423849942</link><description>FOLD AND RELOAD HAHAHA YEP</description><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 06:42:14 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>correct in long run*</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/poker/go/thread/view/94146/23649270/do-i-have-to-call?post_id=423849938#423849938</link><description>correct in long run*</description><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 06:41:21 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>snap call, reload move on. its 1/2 so guy can easily have ak aq a3 a2 etc. for what you have left compared to pot its correct in lond run to call. if you lose you lose so be it</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/poker/go/thread/view/94146/23649270/do-i-have-to-call?post_id=423849934#423849934</link><description>snap call, reload move on. its 1/2 so guy can easily have ak aq a3 a2 etc. for what you have left compared to pot its correct in lond run to call. if you lose you lose so be it</description><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 06:41:00 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>btw plenty of players you could lay this down to.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/poker/go/thread/view/94146/23649270/do-i-have-to-call?post_id=423849930#423849930</link><description>btw plenty of players you could lay this down to.</description><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 06:39:05 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>loose passive = shyte therefore call and pray</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/poker/go/thread/view/94146/23649270/do-i-have-to-call?post_id=423849926#423849926</link><description>loose passive = shyte therefore call and pray</description><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 06:38:43 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>u know your beat.......but u gota call to see.....but u cant beat anything other than a bluff.....wick!!!</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/poker/go/thread/view/94146/23649270/do-i-have-to-call?post_id=423849922#423849922</link><description>u know your beat.......but u gota call to see.....but u cant beat anything other than a bluff.....wick!!!</description><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 06:31:20 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Oh, call anyway. Then reload lol.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/poker/go/thread/view/94146/23649270/do-i-have-to-call?post_id=423849914#423849914</link><description>Oh, call anyway. Then reload lol.</description><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 05:51:52 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>NOT THIS for me :) Too many times you're beating another ace that will just check behind you imo, though maybe not this particular hand lol. Unless it's A3 in this case?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/poker/go/thread/view/94146/23649270/do-i-have-to-call?post_id=423849910#423849910</link><description>NOT THIS for me :) Too many times you're beating another ace that will just check behind you imo, though maybe not this particular hand lol. Unless it's A3 in this case?</description><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 05:49:56 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>argen-toon-a 13 Nov 11:46 however i dont think i would have bet the river. check to induce bluff/lose minimumTHIS</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/poker/go/thread/view/94146/23649270/do-i-have-to-call?post_id=423849902#423849902</link><description>argen-toon-a 13 Nov 11:46 however i dont think i would have bet the river. check to induce bluff/lose minimumTHIS</description><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 05:43:00 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
