New Posts For Thread: SKY TEAMhttps://community.betfair.com/other_sports/go/thread/view/94142/30011457/sky-teamIf it walks like a duck, looks like a duck and sounds like a duck it usually is a duck. david walsh writing piece in sunday times tomorrow. sounds like he is going to defend sky, disappointing from a top class journalist.A yardstick for what? For the truth on doping? Most of the stuff thrown at SKY is people who believed in Armstrong against the evidence of doping, the fact that you still believe in what he says asks serious questions. He's now up to his eyes in lawshttps://community.betfair.com/other_sports/go/thread/view/94142/30011457/sky-team?post_id=534131525#534131525A yardstick for what? For the truth on doping? Most of the stuff thrown at SKY is people who believed in Armstrong against the evidence of doping, the fact that you still believe in what he says asks serious questions. He's now up to his eyes in lawsWed, 24 Jul 2013 10:25:29 -0500cj i will ask you again, who would you use as a yardstick? we all know lance armstrongs history. as i said he probably the worlds most famous doper.simple question, please answer!https://community.betfair.com/other_sports/go/thread/view/94142/30011457/sky-team?post_id=534127323#534127323cj i will ask you again, who would you use as a yardstick? we all know lance armstrongs history. as i said he probably the worlds most famous doper.simple question, please answer!Wed, 24 Jul 2013 07:51:56 -0500Walsh cost the Times a lot of cash by outing Armstrong. The conspiracy theory about certain people keeping quiet because it is SKY and the Times is a Murdoch paper is just silly. The Times staff have written unfavourable comments to Murdoch inc manyhttps://community.betfair.com/other_sports/go/thread/view/94142/30011457/sky-team?post_id=534105525#534105525Walsh cost the Times a lot of cash by outing Armstrong. The conspiracy theory about certain people keeping quiet because it is SKY and the Times is a Murdoch paper is just silly. The Times staff have written unfavourable comments to Murdoch inc manyTue, 23 Jul 2013 11:08:03 -0500He's the worlds most famous doper fighting million dollar lawsuits and trying to salvage anything he can. If you are using Armstrong as a source now knowing his history and his current situation..https://community.betfair.com/other_sports/go/thread/view/94142/30011457/sky-team?post_id=534105083#534105083He's the worlds most famous doper fighting million dollar lawsuits and trying to salvage anything he can. If you are using Armstrong as a source now knowing his history and his current situation..Tue, 23 Jul 2013 10:52:45 -0500Maybe Sky are clean, I personally don't believe they are. But the OP is fair to question Walsh as he has completely ignored Froome's overnight transformation and ascent times at this year's TDF. This is the same Walsh who called out Contador as dopinhttps://community.betfair.com/other_sports/go/thread/view/94142/30011457/sky-team?post_id=534102677#534102677Maybe Sky are clean, I personally don't believe they are. But the OP is fair to question Walsh as he has completely ignored Froome's overnight transformation and ascent times at this year's TDF. This is the same Walsh who called out Contador as dopinTue, 23 Jul 2013 09:27:39 -0500Lance armstrong probably the worlds most famous doper. and you wouldnt use him as a yardstick. may i ask you who would you use?https://community.betfair.com/other_sports/go/thread/view/94142/30011457/sky-team?post_id=534098959#534098959Lance armstrong probably the worlds most famous doper. and you wouldnt use him as a yardstick. may i ask you who would you use?Tue, 23 Jul 2013 07:01:55 -0500Armstrong has been trying to justify why he was a cheat. While you can probably agree with him in what he says there I wouldn't be using him as a yardstick.https://community.betfair.com/other_sports/go/thread/view/94142/30011457/sky-team?post_id=534076091#534076091Armstrong has been trying to justify why he was a cheat. While you can probably agree with him in what he says there I wouldn't be using him as a yardstick.Mon, 22 Jul 2013 10:30:03 -0500does not get the big contract. he stays a domestique. and as you said there is not much money in the sport.https://community.betfair.com/other_sports/go/thread/view/94142/30011457/sky-team?post_id=534073913#534073913does not get the big contract. he stays a domestique. and as you said there is not much money in the sport.Mon, 22 Jul 2013 09:01:01 -0500sorry i didnt make myself clear. how people can defend pro cycling. has there been a clean tour in the last 25 years. doubt it. but im not SURE. Lance armstrong said he could not have won any of his tours if he did not dope. what does that tell us abhttps://community.betfair.com/other_sports/go/thread/view/94142/30011457/sky-team?post_id=534073753#534073753sorry i didnt make myself clear. how people can defend pro cycling. has there been a clean tour in the last 25 years. doubt it. but im not SURE. Lance armstrong said he could not have won any of his tours if he did not dope. what does that tell us abMon, 22 Jul 2013 08:53:49 -0500I'm defending cycling, because it's a wonderful sport (did it by myself on a much lower level). There is almost no Sport with much money involved (and even with much less money) where you won't find cheaters and dopers.https://community.betfair.com/other_sports/go/thread/view/94142/30011457/sky-team?post_id=534072893#534072893I'm defending cycling, because it's a wonderful sport (did it by myself on a much lower level). There is almost no Sport with much money involved (and even with much less money) where you won't find cheaters and dopers.Mon, 22 Jul 2013 08:17:38 -0500