<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Sky's success and the death of entertaining climbing</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/other_sports/go/thread/view/94142/29240943/skys-success-and-the-death-of-entertaining-climbing</link><description>Here's why:Those sepia-toned pre-Sky days...On climbs, the GC candidates would all look at each other. The guys who felt strong, or felt that their opponents were weak would put in monstrous attacks. Those that could keep up, did so, and those that c</description><item><title>Trouble is H M most of those that put in those monstrous attacks were later proved to not be doing it under their own steam.Maybe this is a sign of things to come with the cleaner sport.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/other_sports/go/thread/view/94142/29240943/skys-success-and-the-death-of-entertaining-climbing?post_id=522087267#522087267</link><description>Trouble is H M most of those that put in those monstrous attacks were later proved to not be doing it under their own steam.Maybe this is a sign of things to come with the cleaner sport.</description><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:45:43 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Good posts. Have to give Wiggins and co some credit though, yes they look very relaxed and efficient and the technology will help but theyve always got a huge group behind them doing exactly the same pace.I don't know why other teams arent attacking</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/other_sports/go/thread/view/94142/29240943/skys-success-and-the-death-of-entertaining-climbing?post_id=522086687#522086687</link><description>Good posts. Have to give Wiggins and co some credit though, yes they look very relaxed and efficient and the technology will help but theyve always got a huge group behind them doing exactly the same pace.I don't know why other teams arent attacking</description><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:25:41 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>great read from the OP</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/other_sports/go/thread/view/94142/29240943/skys-success-and-the-death-of-entertaining-climbing?post_id=522063549#522063549</link><description>great read from the OP</description><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 17:11:21 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>an 'aggressive' climber is an inefficient climber</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/other_sports/go/thread/view/94142/29240943/skys-success-and-the-death-of-entertaining-climbing?post_id=522063519#522063519</link><description>an 'aggressive' climber is an inefficient climber</description><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 17:10:08 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Bring back Floyd Landis</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/other_sports/go/thread/view/94142/29240943/skys-success-and-the-death-of-entertaining-climbing?post_id=522042925#522042925</link><description>Bring back Floyd Landis</description><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 08:09:07 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>HM, interesting post.  I am with all the other posters above who want to see this method tested by an exceptional and aggressive climber.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/other_sports/go/thread/view/94142/29240943/skys-success-and-the-death-of-entertaining-climbing?post_id=522042853#522042853</link><description>HM, interesting post.  I am with all the other posters above who want to see this method tested by an exceptional and aggressive climber.</description><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 08:06:39 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>oops!</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/other_sports/go/thread/view/94142/29240943/skys-success-and-the-death-of-entertaining-climbing?post_id=522040799#522040799</link><description>oops!</description><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 06:56:08 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Absolutely spot on History Maker, and should it continue year after year,then heres one former watcher coming up.Quiet possibly the most boring tour ive ever watched,certainly as far as i am concerned anyway.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/other_sports/go/thread/view/94142/29240943/skys-success-and-the-death-of-entertaining-climbing?post_id=522040791#522040791</link><description>Absolutely spot on History Maker, and should it continue year after year,then heres one former watcher coming up.Quiet possibly the most boring tour ive ever watched,certainly as far as i am concerned anyway.</description><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 06:55:52 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Absolutely spot on History Maker, and should it continue year after year,then heres one former watcher coming up.Quiet possibly the most boring tour ive ever watched,certainly as far as i am concerned anyway.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/other_sports/go/thread/view/94142/29240943/skys-success-and-the-death-of-entertaining-climbing?post_id=522040773#522040773</link><description>Absolutely spot on History Maker, and should it continue year after year,then heres one former watcher coming up.Quiet possibly the most boring tour ive ever watched,certainly as far as i am concerned anyway.</description><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 06:55:13 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>It doesn't help that the best "clean" climber Andy Schleck is not in the field. He would not be leading the GC but he might have disrupted SKY's rhythm isolated Wiggins to some extent.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/other_sports/go/thread/view/94142/29240943/skys-success-and-the-death-of-entertaining-climbing?post_id=522040451#522040451</link><description>It doesn't help that the best "clean" climber Andy Schleck is not in the field. He would not be leading the GC but he might have disrupted SKY's rhythm isolated Wiggins to some extent.</description><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 06:44:05 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
