<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Denver vs San Diego</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/30175847/denver-vs-san-diego</link><description>Full disclosure :  I seldom bet pre off.  It's not worth my time and effort to research and come up with a bet when I can just play in play, take a few percentage, be happy.I have put some picks up here when I've been so inclined just for the heck of</description><item><title>ffs I give up. You`re right, we weren`t lucky. I`m brilliant, you`re brilliant, everybody else that bet SD are brilliant too and the result was NEVER in doubt. Easy money this NFL</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/30175847/denver-vs-san-diego?post_id=537489551#537489551</link><description>ffs I give up. You`re right, we weren`t lucky. I`m brilliant, you`re brilliant, everybody else that bet SD are brilliant too and the result was NEVER in doubt. Easy money this NFL</description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2014 18:11:38 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>In the context of this I liked the post db1974  made as part of his divisional thread"so there is definitely a shift towards the Road Dog covering the spread since 2004 following years of dominance by the Home Fav. I think this makes sense as home ad</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/30175847/denver-vs-san-diego?post_id=537475599#537475599</link><description>In the context of this I liked the post db1974  made as part of his divisional thread"so there is definitely a shift towards the Road Dog covering the spread since 2004 following years of dominance by the Home Fav. I think this makes sense as home ad</description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2014 05:04:44 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>you implied it by arguing it was lucky to win (ie should have lost ie was a bad bet etc etc).And to repeat: It was only lucky to win FROM A SPECIFIC MOMENT IN TIME WHICH YOU HAVE CHOSEN AFTER THE EVENT.  When actually there's no more luck involved th</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/30175847/denver-vs-san-diego?post_id=537474287#537474287</link><description>you implied it by arguing it was lucky to win (ie should have lost ie was a bad bet etc etc).And to repeat: It was only lucky to win FROM A SPECIFIC MOMENT IN TIME WHICH YOU HAVE CHOSEN AFTER THE EVENT.  When actually there's no more luck involved th</description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2014 03:50:33 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>How can you argue that opposing a 10pt spread bet  is a bad bet between these teamsWhere did I ever state that?Try reading my posts. I BET SD TOO and the way the game went I got lucky and so did you. However all that matters is Final score, so you ar</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/30175847/denver-vs-san-diego?post_id=537466115#537466115</link><description>How can you argue that opposing a 10pt spread bet  is a bad bet between these teamsWhere did I ever state that?Try reading my posts. I BET SD TOO and the way the game went I got lucky and so did you. However all that matters is Final score, so you ar</description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2014 15:32:46 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>you're missing the point - not all winning bets are going to be immediate winners with no adversity (it's why they settle after 60 mins and not after 5 mins). So often, you can pick a point in an event when it looked like a loser and then say it was</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/30175847/denver-vs-san-diego?post_id=537461073#537461073</link><description>you're missing the point - not all winning bets are going to be immediate winners with no adversity (it's why they settle after 60 mins and not after 5 mins). So often, you can pick a point in an event when it looked like a loser and then say it was</description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2014 10:17:45 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Glad it won for us, but if you were confident that you were going to win, let alone get a push with your 10pt start, when 4th and long on their own 25yd line late on, then I`m afraid you are kidding yourself on - move on</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/30175847/denver-vs-san-diego?post_id=537459869#537459869</link><description>Glad it won for us, but if you were confident that you were going to win, let alone get a push with your 10pt start, when 4th and long on their own 25yd line late on, then I`m afraid you are kidding yourself on - move on</description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2014 09:03:47 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Nah.  I bet SD +10 at 1.66 or something, and it was never more than 17 gap, so I was never two scores down.  Don't see how that's a lucky winner.  Yeah, Denver proved they were the better team, and always comfortable, but that wasn't the bet. It's a</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/30175847/denver-vs-san-diego?post_id=537454609#537454609</link><description>Nah.  I bet SD +10 at 1.66 or something, and it was never more than 17 gap, so I was never two scores down.  Don't see how that's a lucky winner.  Yeah, Denver proved they were the better team, and always comfortable, but that wasn't the bet. It's a</description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2014 04:16:53 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Anybody that bet SD +8.5 on the handicap, including myself, got lucky. If it had been a boxing match the ref would have stopped it.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/30175847/denver-vs-san-diego?post_id=537442599#537442599</link><description>Anybody that bet SD +8.5 on the handicap, including myself, got lucky. If it had been a boxing match the ref would have stopped it.</description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2014 14:33:26 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>bigpoppapump - I'm sorry but u are completely wrong if u listening to Peyton Manning's post match interview about Denver's tactics. It was Denver who moved away from their usual game plan to occupy time. Nothing of San Diego's doing</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/30175847/denver-vs-san-diego?post_id=537438783#537438783</link><description>bigpoppapump - I'm sorry but u are completely wrong if u listening to Peyton Manning's post match interview about Denver's tactics. It was Denver who moved away from their usual game plan to occupy time. Nothing of San Diego's doing</description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:43:17 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Was not a lucky handicap win on SD.SD did the "hard part" of their pregame task which was slow up the Denver point scoring machine (over 31.5 was odds on) to the tune of more than a touchdown.  Restricting Denver to 24 means it would have been extrem</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/30175847/denver-vs-san-diego?post_id=537438143#537438143</link><description>Was not a lucky handicap win on SD.SD did the "hard part" of their pregame task which was slow up the Denver point scoring machine (over 31.5 was odds on) to the tune of more than a touchdown.  Restricting Denver to 24 means it would have been extrem</description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:01:16 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
