<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Temp refs in NFL are good</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/29396853/temp-refs-in-nfl-are-good</link><description>Having read the criticism of these refs in NFL and the appalling US commentary, here is what I think.The temp refs are fine and in some ways are better than the "full time" ones. People are only complaining of the new refs cos the american commentato</description><item><title>also how do they not see tate push off from shields which puts him on his arse</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/29396853/temp-refs-in-nfl-are-good?post_id=524485133#524485133</link><description>also how do they not see tate push off from shields which puts him on his arse</description><pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 18:37:23 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>They made a big big mistake. Thats bad enough, but to review it and still get it wrong is totally unacceptable. Everybody in the world knew it was an error, except thos couple of clowns. At least the guy who signalled touchback can hold his head up t</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/29396853/temp-refs-in-nfl-are-good?post_id=524483763#524483763</link><description>They made a big big mistake. Thats bad enough, but to review it and still get it wrong is totally unacceptable. Everybody in the world knew it was an error, except thos couple of clowns. At least the guy who signalled touchback can hold his head up t</description><pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 17:25:27 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>every play cant be reviewable so there will always be human error but last night was riduclous and had the pros been officaiting the call wud never of stood. it cud have a massive impact on the season for gb as its a 2 game swing cud cost them no1 or</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/29396853/temp-refs-in-nfl-are-good?post_id=524483515#524483515</link><description>every play cant be reviewable so there will always be human error but last night was riduclous and had the pros been officaiting the call wud never of stood. it cud have a massive impact on the season for gb as its a 2 game swing cud cost them no1 or</description><pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 17:16:43 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>All said, I'd still rather have the the others back. Not...entirely....sure why though! I've been fcked over by those **** before too!</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/29396853/temp-refs-in-nfl-are-good?post_id=524483423#524483423</link><description>All said, I'd still rather have the the others back. Not...entirely....sure why though! I've been fcked over by those **** before too!</description><pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 17:12:51 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>There's most certainly a degree of truth in the OP. Calls are now being scrutinised far more than they ever were, because nobody likes a scab! People will ALWAYS scrutinize the quality of 'stand ins' or scabs in any place of work during a strike. No,</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/29396853/temp-refs-in-nfl-are-good?post_id=524483371#524483371</link><description>There's most certainly a degree of truth in the OP. Calls are now being scrutinised far more than they ever were, because nobody likes a scab! People will ALWAYS scrutinize the quality of 'stand ins' or scabs in any place of work during a strike. No,</description><pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 17:11:24 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Last night was the final nail imo unfair on them as there not qualified for the job in a profeesional basis but its ruining a highly run professional outfit. fair enuff the real refs make bad calls but the replacements seemed to be scared to throw th</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/29396853/temp-refs-in-nfl-are-good?post_id=524482945#524482945</link><description>Last night was the final nail imo unfair on them as there not qualified for the job in a profeesional basis but its ruining a highly run professional outfit. fair enuff the real refs make bad calls but the replacements seemed to be scared to throw th</description><pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:55:02 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>"The jumbo screen shows the replay, ive missed it so bad" lmao, thats brilliant.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/29396853/temp-refs-in-nfl-are-good?post_id=524480583#524480583</link><description>"The jumbo screen shows the replay, ive missed it so bad" lmao, thats brilliant.</description><pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 15:40:05 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AzPBcCF9yKc</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/29396853/temp-refs-in-nfl-are-good?post_id=524479933#524479933</link><description>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AzPBcCF9yKc</description><pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 15:22:47 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Well said tsango it's good to view  a reasoned argument......now what size straitjacket will you be wanting</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/29396853/temp-refs-in-nfl-are-good?post_id=524468885#524468885</link><description>Well said tsango it's good to view  a reasoned argument......now what size straitjacket will you be wanting</description><pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 09:55:57 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>well yes I know what you are saying....nfl has to take responsibility for this but the refs shouldnt be doing the job if they dont feel they are up to doing it.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/29396853/temp-refs-in-nfl-are-good?post_id=524457649#524457649</link><description>well yes I know what you are saying....nfl has to take responsibility for this but the refs shouldnt be doing the job if they dont feel they are up to doing it.</description><pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 23:16:00 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
