<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Seattle V Rams</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/26564217/seattle-v-rams</link><description>Hasselback active,This makes the Seahawks the play imohttp://twitter.com/#!/dannyoneil/statuses/21716653033127936</description><item><title>They've opened at -10.It's the full &Acirc;&pound;2!!!!</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/26564217/seattle-v-rams?post_id=480246601#480246601</link><description>They've opened at -10.It's the full &Acirc;&pound;2!!!!</description><pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 10:24:38 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>get it back on the saints</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/26564217/seattle-v-rams?post_id=480245617#480245617</link><description>get it back on the saints</description><pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 10:13:45 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>That was probably my only reservation, but I considered Seattle so poor, particularly with Whitehurst under centre, that I felt 1.5 was safe enough to invest heavily.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/26564217/seattle-v-rams?post_id=480245281#480245281</link><description>That was probably my only reservation, but I considered Seattle so poor, particularly with Whitehurst under centre, that I felt 1.5 was safe enough to invest heavily.</description><pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 10:09:26 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>i didnt have a bet on game becuase i couldn't have backed a team with a losing record to win on the road in q west field</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/26564217/seattle-v-rams?post_id=480244205#480244205</link><description>i didnt have a bet on game becuase i couldn't have backed a team with a losing record to win on the road in q west field</description><pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 09:57:34 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>You're probably right - especially as I 'advised' (I use the term loosely!) people to avoid this week completely.The more I looked at the bet though, the more attractive it looked - I took Rams -1.5 and was planning my purchases before kick off. I bl</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/26564217/seattle-v-rams?post_id=480244045#480244045</link><description>You're probably right - especially as I 'advised' (I use the term loosely!) people to avoid this week completely.The more I looked at the bet though, the more attractive it looked - I took Rams -1.5 and was planning my purchases before kick off. I bl</description><pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 09:55:19 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>OriolesYou only have yourself to blame betting on these 2 teams.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/26564217/seattle-v-rams?post_id=480243429#480243429</link><description>OriolesYou only have yourself to blame betting on these 2 teams.</description><pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 09:48:54 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>I should declare an interest; I lost a fortune on this game.However, Seattle are AWFUL and any half decent team, developing or not, should have dealt with them with ease."It's just frustrating to get this far and have an opportunity to make the playo</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/26564217/seattle-v-rams?post_id=480243069#480243069</link><description>I should declare an interest; I lost a fortune on this game.However, Seattle are AWFUL and any half decent team, developing or not, should have dealt with them with ease."It's just frustrating to get this far and have an opportunity to make the playo</description><pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 09:44:22 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Absolute rubbish. It was too early for the rams to hit the playoffs. This is a team on the up. Now they will get a decent draft and be able to hopefully draft some decent WRs. It was probably in their best long term interest if they lost last night.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/26564217/seattle-v-rams?post_id=480242125#480242125</link><description>Absolute rubbish. It was too early for the rams to hit the playoffs. This is a team on the up. Now they will get a decent draft and be able to hopefully draft some decent WRs. It was probably in their best long term interest if they lost last night.</description><pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 09:33:47 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>How BAD were the Rams &amp; Bradford?  They were fooking AWFUL.  The coaching staff should ALL be sacked.  A franchise going nowhere</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/26564217/seattle-v-rams?post_id=480240489#480240489</link><description>How BAD were the Rams &amp; Bradford?  They were fooking AWFUL.  The coaching staff should ALL be sacked.  A franchise going nowhere</description><pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 09:15:21 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Yes pocket talkers, the Rams shouldn't be blamed at all for this loss. It was only the officials fault. What a load of w*nk you lads are talking!</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/26564217/seattle-v-rams?post_id=480209093#480209093</link><description>Yes pocket talkers, the Rams shouldn't be blamed at all for this loss. It was only the officials fault. What a load of w*nk you lads are talking!</description><pubDate>Sun, 02 Jan 2011 22:47:12 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
