<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: yuvi/aces high-NFL</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/25769537/yuviaces-high-nfl</link><description>Hi fellas-I am going to give punting on the NFL a proper go this year. I'm a total dork for it. be v interested to hear your views/bounce some ideas off you. I tend to try and back teams playing away from home when I otherwise think they are much bet</description><item><title>I will be watching to SEE if " CUTLER " has Grown up yet.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/25769537/yuviaces-high-nfl?post_id=465265465#465265465</link><description>I will be watching to SEE if " CUTLER " has Grown up yet.</description><pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 20:45:29 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>i don't think you can have pre-conceived ideas about which teams you want to back/oppose for the duration of the season. so much changes week to week, not least the odds/lines. so even if you're right about the teams the oddsmakers will adjust accord</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/25769537/yuviaces-high-nfl?post_id=465222105#465222105</link><description>i don't think you can have pre-conceived ideas about which teams you want to back/oppose for the duration of the season. so much changes week to week, not least the odds/lines. so even if you're right about the teams the oddsmakers will adjust accord</description><pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 15:50:47 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Aces High/life taker cheers.I oppose New England because (i) i don't think they can stop the run even with Vince Wilfork healthy and becasue their secondary looks very vulnerable. When you combine that with the fact they have a limited pass rush you</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/25769537/yuviaces-high-nfl?post_id=465016961#465016961</link><description>Aces High/life taker cheers.I oppose New England because (i) i don't think they can stop the run even with Vince Wilfork healthy and becasue their secondary looks very vulnerable. When you combine that with the fact they have a limited pass rush you</description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 06:36:54 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Revis signing today.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/25769537/yuviaces-high-nfl?post_id=465007361#465007361</link><description>Revis signing today.</description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 03:31:45 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I'm finding myself agreeing with Ace High again</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/25769537/yuviaces-high-nfl?post_id=464731661#464731661</link><description>I'm finding myself agreeing with Ace High again</description><pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 05:36:36 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>I wouldnt want to oppose new england too much.  I read in the F.O almanac that last season Brady faced the toughest schedule of pass defences since they started taking records !  With an easier schedule, Moss in a contract year, Welker, Edelman, thes</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/25769537/yuviaces-high-nfl?post_id=464698009#464698009</link><description>I wouldnt want to oppose new england too much.  I read in the F.O almanac that last season Brady faced the toughest schedule of pass defences since they started taking records !  With an easier schedule, Moss in a contract year, Welker, Edelman, thes</description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 20:52:48 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Tom Brady ~ ~ to FADE into the history Book's  But is it the " T R U T H "</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/25769537/yuviaces-high-nfl?post_id=464688745#464688745</link><description>Tom Brady ~ ~ to FADE into the history Book's  But is it the " T R U T H "</description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 19:31:09 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>That that last year NE showed : " What's that's Guy's name ? " You know their QB. ? HAS Lost His NERVESo unless they REPLACE Him OR He show's a Turn-around, Going against would be My view.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/25769537/yuviaces-high-nfl?post_id=464687465#464687465</link><description>That that last year NE showed : " What's that's Guy's name ? " You know their QB. ? HAS Lost His NERVESo unless they REPLACE Him OR He show's a Turn-around, Going against would be My view.</description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 19:19:34 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>Heard a few people suggesting NE are yesterdays team, probably are but on their day can beat anyone.Think the Cards might really drop off a cliff this year.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/25769537/yuviaces-high-nfl?post_id=464654797#464654797</link><description>Heard a few people suggesting NE are yesterdays team, probably are but on their day can beat anyone.Think the Cards might really drop off a cliff this year.</description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:04:13 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title>New England Gone is an interesting theory.  The pre-season magazine i bought from the US have tipped them to win the whole thing!  I'm a little undecided to be honest but I think opposing Tom Brady/Bill Belichick/Randy Moss is not something i'd want</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/25769537/yuviaces-high-nfl?post_id=464631285#464631285</link><description>New England Gone is an interesting theory.  The pre-season magazine i bought from the US have tipped them to win the whole thing!  I'm a little undecided to be honest but I think opposing Tom Brady/Bill Belichick/Randy Moss is not something i'd want</description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 12:00:23 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
