New Posts For Thread: Power Rankings for the Playoffshttps://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/23642538/power-rankings-for-the-playoffs1 San Diego2 Dallas3 Indianapolis4 Philadelphia5 Green Bay6 Tennessee7 Houston8 New England9 Carolina10 New Orleans11 Minnesota12 Atlanta13 New York J14 Pittsburgh15 Baltimore16 Arizona17 Cincinnati1Floz, At least your a Fraction more REALIST than the Current prices being offerd Has me thinking How much $$,$$$ Dollars are laying the Colts Early & Wantting a Early Saints score - to Trade ?Well as every-one knows my comment`s may be in favour of thttps://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/23642538/power-rankings-for-the-playoffs?post_id=423688630#423688630Floz, At least your a Fraction more REALIST than the Current prices being offerd Has me thinking How much $$,$$$ Dollars are laying the Colts Early & Wantting a Early Saints score - to Trade ?Well as every-one knows my comment`s may be in favour of tTue, 26 Jan 2010 18:52:58 -0600last posting of the year -superbowl tissue prices -indianapolis 1.60 New Orleans 2.67https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/23642538/power-rankings-for-the-playoffs?post_id=423688626#423688626last posting of the year -superbowl tissue prices -indianapolis 1.60 New Orleans 2.67Tue, 26 Jan 2010 03:19:39 -0600So penultimate roll of the dice.Jets - can they run it down the colts throats. If the d can keep Indy to 20 or less, they can do it.Vikings - I'm relying on the Vikings being good last week rather than the cowboys hopeless. Struggling to convince myshttps://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/23642538/power-rankings-for-the-playoffs?post_id=423688370#423688370So penultimate roll of the dice.Jets - can they run it down the colts throats. If the d can keep Indy to 20 or less, they can do it.Vikings - I'm relying on the Vikings being good last week rather than the cowboys hopeless. Struggling to convince mysSat, 23 Jan 2010 06:33:05 -0600Think anyone with a rankings system based on the 16 game season would have been caught out by NYJ against San Diego. I had them at about 1.30 against NYJ which was lower than their starting price. A lesson learned in that respect to modify rankings ihttps://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/23642538/power-rankings-for-the-playoffs?post_id=423688354#423688354Think anyone with a rankings system based on the 16 game season would have been caught out by NYJ against San Diego. I had them at about 1.30 against NYJ which was lower than their starting price. A lesson learned in that respect to modify rankings iMon, 18 Jan 2010 11:09:56 -0600thanks for sharing that diesel. i have tinkered with points based ratings for establishing handicap prices rather than outright match prices.i found several difficulties that i couldn't work out a satisfactory way to overcome.stratifying the resultshttps://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/23642538/power-rankings-for-the-playoffs?post_id=423688350#423688350thanks for sharing that diesel. i have tinkered with points based ratings for establishing handicap prices rather than outright match prices.i found several difficulties that i couldn't work out a satisfactory way to overcome.stratifying the resultsMon, 18 Jan 2010 06:54:36 -0600Interesting stuff Floz.I've actually got my own Power rankings program that I've been running for 6 years now. In the example you give, I'd re-rate the winner of the 50-50 game as follows.Home team wins by 3 or less - No change in ratings.Home team whttps://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/23642538/power-rankings-for-the-playoffs?post_id=423688346#423688346Interesting stuff Floz.I've actually got my own Power rankings program that I've been running for 6 years now. In the example you give, I'd re-rate the winner of the 50-50 game as follows.Home team wins by 3 or less - No change in ratings.Home team wMon, 18 Jan 2010 04:42:23 -0600Diesel,You're spot on. I adjust by 1/8th of the actual result over the expected.ie team 1 rated .500 playing at home v team 2 rated .500 with a .600 home field advantage modifyer makes the expected result .600/.400 -team 1 1.67 team 2 2.5if team 1 wihttps://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/23642538/power-rankings-for-the-playoffs?post_id=423688342#423688342Diesel,You're spot on. I adjust by 1/8th of the actual result over the expected.ie team 1 rated .500 playing at home v team 2 rated .500 with a .600 home field advantage modifyer makes the expected result .600/.400 -team 1 1.67 team 2 2.5if team 1 wiMon, 18 Jan 2010 03:55:30 -0600Floz,Bad luck over the weekend. The thing that hit's me regarding your rankings is that you are giving far too much weight to a team last game. The Jets have gone from a No hoper against San Diego to being equal with Colts (taking Home Field into acchttps://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/23642538/power-rankings-for-the-playoffs?post_id=423688338#423688338Floz,Bad luck over the weekend. The thing that hit's me regarding your rankings is that you are giving far too much weight to a team last game. The Jets have gone from a No hoper against San Diego to being equal with Colts (taking Home Field into accMon, 18 Jan 2010 03:34:32 -0600tar arrested.anyway, better see it through to the end. Indianapolis 1.65 New York J 2.53 New Orleans 1.68 Minnesota 2.47https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/23642538/power-rankings-for-the-playoffs?post_id=423688334#423688334tar arrested.anyway, better see it through to the end. Indianapolis 1.65 New York J 2.53 New Orleans 1.68 Minnesota 2.47Mon, 18 Jan 2010 03:22:06 -0600The game will make a mug out of all of us at some point Floz, thats the beauty of it in some ways. You'll be back next season and I'm sure you're sharp enough to get back on track.https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/23642538/power-rankings-for-the-playoffs?post_id=423688318#423688318The game will make a mug out of all of us at some point Floz, thats the beauty of it in some ways. You'll be back next season and I'm sure you're sharp enough to get back on track.Sun, 17 Jan 2010 19:00:22 -0600