<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: who would your money be on at this point to win the SUPER BOWL</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/23641950/who-would-your-money-be-on-at-this-point-to-win-the-super-bowl</link><description>dont ask me i am clueless, but can the chargers do it ???</description><item><title>i cannot believe the market still does not respect the cardinals.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/23641950/who-would-your-money-be-on-at-this-point-to-win-the-super-bowl?post_id=423653722#423653722</link><description>i cannot believe the market still does not respect the cardinals.</description><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 12:55:56 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Since the Packers are out im going to pick my team Sat morn.Liking Viks and Chargers</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/23641950/who-would-your-money-be-on-at-this-point-to-win-the-super-bowl?post_id=423653690#423653690</link><description>Since the Packers are out im going to pick my team Sat morn.Liking Viks and Chargers</description><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 11:28:47 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Chargers still.....but have had a long-shot saver on the Cards..[and their awesome D!!!]</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/23641950/who-would-your-money-be-on-at-this-point-to-win-the-super-bowl?post_id=423653658#423653658</link><description>Chargers still.....but have had a long-shot saver on the Cards..[and their awesome D!!!]</description><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 05:39:21 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Can't see Indy mot making it to the Superbowl now.Also think the Saints will turn it around when it counts.And then you'd have to fancy Indy.So really all i'm doing is telling you what the market is.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/23641950/who-would-your-money-be-on-at-this-point-to-win-the-super-bowl?post_id=423653494#423653494</link><description>Can't see Indy mot making it to the Superbowl now.Also think the Saints will turn it around when it counts.And then you'd have to fancy Indy.So really all i'm doing is telling you what the market is.</description><pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 08:50:56 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>i think if you're looking for a bet at this stage, you could do worse than backing GB and/or BAL at the prices.i fancy BAL to beat NE and then IND. never like teams with the bye resting players going into the playoffs and think IND will suffer from t</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/23641950/who-would-your-money-be-on-at-this-point-to-win-the-super-bowl?post_id=423653490#423653490</link><description>i think if you're looking for a bet at this stage, you could do worse than backing GB and/or BAL at the prices.i fancy BAL to beat NE and then IND. never like teams with the bye resting players going into the playoffs and think IND will suffer from t</description><pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 07:29:09 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Bouncebackability is a chavy English soccer term if i am correct</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/23641950/who-would-your-money-be-on-at-this-point-to-win-the-super-bowl?post_id=423653486#423653486</link><description>Bouncebackability is a chavy English soccer term if i am correct</description><pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 07:02:44 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>London Lawman, Bouncebackability Surelly Not, American's F uc king Up English yet again.Saint's, with a fun bet on the Raven's</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/23641950/who-would-your-money-be-on-at-this-point-to-win-the-super-bowl?post_id=423653482#423653482</link><description>London Lawman, Bouncebackability Surelly Not, American's F uc king Up English yet again.Saint's, with a fun bet on the Raven's</description><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 22:37:17 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>im on the first 4 in the betting at the moment- the teams with byes and home games to come. bound to all get shorter after the wildcard games are out of the way, happens every year.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/23641950/who-would-your-money-be-on-at-this-point-to-win-the-super-bowl?post_id=423653478#423653478</link><description>im on the first 4 in the betting at the moment- the teams with byes and home games to come. bound to all get shorter after the wildcard games are out of the way, happens every year.</description><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 12:03:37 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>no idea really but id be surprised if the colts or chargers arent close to 1/2 favs in the superbowl. backing them both wouldnt be the worst thing to do, 6/4 ish.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/23641950/who-would-your-money-be-on-at-this-point-to-win-the-super-bowl?post_id=423653474#423653474</link><description>no idea really but id be surprised if the colts or chargers arent close to 1/2 favs in the superbowl. backing them both wouldnt be the worst thing to do, 6/4 ish.</description><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:59:09 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>backed the jets myself a few weeks ago,agree about the defence and we know revis will take out the primary receiver but i'm worried that sanchez isn't good enough and if they meet a defence capable of stopping the run then he has to air it out which</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/23641950/who-would-your-money-be-on-at-this-point-to-win-the-super-bowl?post_id=423653470#423653470</link><description>backed the jets myself a few weeks ago,agree about the defence and we know revis will take out the primary receiver but i'm worried that sanchez isn't good enough and if they meet a defence capable of stopping the run then he has to air it out which</description><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:19:09 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
