<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: NFL Power Ratings (courtesy of FLOZ)</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/23638718/nfl-power-ratings-courtesy-of-floz</link><description>Do with them as you will. They form the basis of my betting and i've done quite nicely. There are two tables. Both are calculated arithmetically and both account for strength of schedule and home/away advantage. Neither account for margin of victory.</description><item><title>week 17 5 wins +6.32 8 losses 12.14season total68 wins +119.31 64 losses -118.77pathetic - a guessers result.absolutely carved up on week 17. all 5 favs selected won. all 8 dogs selected (mostly selected cos enhanced odds on news of non-trying/reserv</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/23638718/nfl-power-ratings-courtesy-of-floz?post_id=423575958#423575958</link><description>week 17 5 wins +6.32 8 losses 12.14season total68 wins +119.31 64 losses -118.77pathetic - a guessers result.absolutely carved up on week 17. all 5 favs selected won. all 8 dogs selected (mostly selected cos enhanced odds on news of non-trying/reserv</description><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 09:40:27 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>i was. i'm not now.week 16 and 17 destroyed me. i'll do the numbers now.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/23638718/nfl-power-ratings-courtesy-of-floz?post_id=423575954#423575954</link><description>i was. i'm not now.week 16 and 17 destroyed me. i'll do the numbers now.</description><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 09:30:42 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>havent seen this before . . . are you up from the season by doing all this?</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/23638718/nfl-power-ratings-courtesy-of-floz?post_id=423575878#423575878</link><description>havent seen this before . . . are you up from the season by doing all this?</description><pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 04:28:49 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Saints @ 3.8Bengals @ 5.2add those in the category of Indy and New England.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/23638718/nfl-power-ratings-courtesy-of-floz?post_id=423575874#423575874</link><description>Saints @ 3.8Bengals @ 5.2add those in the category of Indy and New England.</description><pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 03:25:51 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>so the prices as are -atlanta @ 1.84chicago @ 1.59giants @ 4.6miami @ 2.7sf @ 1.33raiders @ 5.9philly @ 2.5tennessee @ 1.51san diego @ 1.53are all taken.i'm going to add in there indy @ 4.6new england @ 4.1and i'll be back to take the bengals and sai</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/23638718/nfl-power-ratings-courtesy-of-floz?post_id=423575870#423575870</link><description>so the prices as are -atlanta @ 1.84chicago @ 1.59giants @ 4.6miami @ 2.7sf @ 1.33raiders @ 5.9philly @ 2.5tennessee @ 1.51san diego @ 1.53are all taken.i'm going to add in there indy @ 4.6new england @ 4.1and i'll be back to take the bengals and sai</description><pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 07:23:00 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Only one bet for me this week - Miami</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/23638718/nfl-power-ratings-courtesy-of-floz?post_id=423575866#423575866</link><description>Only one bet for me this week - Miami</description><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 07:17:22 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>correction........ Buffalo 11.2 Indianapolis 1.10 Tampa Bay 2.86 Atlanta 1.54 St Louis 10.6 San Francisco 1.10 Minnesota 1.46 New York G 3.18 Miami 1.59 Pittsburgh 2.69 Houston</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/23638718/nfl-power-ratings-courtesy-of-floz?post_id=423575862#423575862</link><description>correction........ Buffalo 11.2 Indianapolis 1.10 Tampa Bay 2.86 Atlanta 1.54 St Louis 10.6 San Francisco 1.10 Minnesota 1.46 New York G 3.18 Miami 1.59 Pittsburgh 2.69 Houston</description><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 05:26:24 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>week 17 tissue Buffalo 11.1 Indianapolis 1.10 Tampa Bay 2.82 Atlanta 1.55 St Louis 10.4 San Francisco 1.11 Minnesota 1.45 New York G 3.24 Miami 1.57 Pittsburgh 2.74 Houston 2.</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/23638718/nfl-power-ratings-courtesy-of-floz?post_id=423575858#423575858</link><description>week 17 tissue Buffalo 11.1 Indianapolis 1.10 Tampa Bay 2.82 Atlanta 1.55 St Louis 10.4 San Francisco 1.11 Minnesota 1.45 New York G 3.24 Miami 1.57 Pittsburgh 2.74 Houston 2.</description><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 05:21:45 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>January 1 power rankings1 San Diego2 Indianapolis3 Philadelphia4 New England5 New Orleans6 Dallas7 Tennessee8 Arizona9 Cincinnati10 Green Bay11 Houston12 Minnesota13 Carolina14 Atlanta 15 New York J16 B</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/23638718/nfl-power-ratings-courtesy-of-floz?post_id=423575854#423575854</link><description>January 1 power rankings1 San Diego2 Indianapolis3 Philadelphia4 New England5 New Orleans6 Dallas7 Tennessee8 Arizona9 Cincinnati10 Green Bay11 Houston12 Minnesota13 Carolina14 Atlanta 15 New York J16 B</description><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 05:02:29 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>Ok, truely awful after the good start San Diego gave us. Although with Carolina big winners at a nice price more than 100% of the weekly loss is accounted for by the new Orleans and Indianapolis results. New Orleans, fair enough, they are obviously n</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/23638718/nfl-power-ratings-courtesy-of-floz?post_id=423575850#423575850</link><description>Ok, truely awful after the good start San Diego gave us. Although with Carolina big winners at a nice price more than 100% of the weekly loss is accounted for by the new Orleans and Indianapolis results. New Orleans, fair enough, they are obviously n</description><pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 05:44:30 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
