<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
							<channel><title>New Posts For Thread: Cardinals @ 49ers</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/23637782/cardinals-49ers</link><description>Warner will be looking to make sure they get homefield advantage in the playoffs, San Fransisco will have lingering hopes of a highly unlikely wildcard spot. However with homefield advantage and 3.5 points I thought that San Fransisco looked the valu</description><item><title>how is it actually possible to turn the ball over 7 timesand against the 49ers!!!</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/23637782/cardinals-49ers?post_id=423520398#423520398</link><description>how is it actually possible to turn the ball over 7 timesand against the 49ers!!!</description><pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:49:24 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>you may have been more accurate 2 years ago if im honest, but nowadays, im a well oiled, mean green trading machine im afraid</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/23637782/cardinals-49ers?post_id=423520374#423520374</link><description>you may have been more accurate 2 years ago if im honest, but nowadays, im a well oiled, mean green trading machine im afraid</description><pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:28:50 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>you clearly make a terrible lay then lump alot more money at shorter odds to get out of the awful lay, nothing clever about that, just suicide betting...if it works for you good luck but you must get badly burnt at times..sleep time</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/23637782/cardinals-49ers?post_id=423520370#423520370</link><description>you clearly make a terrible lay then lump alot more money at shorter odds to get out of the awful lay, nothing clever about that, just suicide betting...if it works for you good luck but you must get badly burnt at times..sleep time</description><pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:25:51 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>:D not even able to debate the finer points of trading so laying heads at 1.05, that turns out to be a heads and never looks more like going tails is a bad lay :Di think the ability of the forum to disuss or even comprehend the finer points is at an</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/23637782/cardinals-49ers?post_id=423520366#423520366</link><description>:D not even able to debate the finer points of trading so laying heads at 1.05, that turns out to be a heads and never looks more like going tails is a bad lay :Di think the ability of the forum to disuss or even comprehend the finer points is at an</description><pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:23:50 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>great 1.65 lay wd</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/23637782/cardinals-49ers?post_id=423520362#423520362</link><description>great 1.65 lay wd</description><pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:20:37 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>so a lay or back is only good or bad dependign on subsequent events and outcomes?using that theory, laying 1.05 in a head and tails contest, that straightlines to 1.01 when it is shown, is actaully a bad lay . . . a good or bad lay is dependent on th</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/23637782/cardinals-49ers?post_id=423520358#423520358</link><description>so a lay or back is only good or bad dependign on subsequent events and outcomes?using that theory, laying 1.05 in a head and tails contest, that straightlines to 1.01 when it is shown, is actaully a bad lay . . . a good or bad lay is dependent on th</description><pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:17:49 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>seen worse lays? laying 1.65 shot that's 1.08 within no time, hmm ok</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/23637782/cardinals-49ers?post_id=423520350#423520350</link><description>seen worse lays? laying 1.65 shot that's 1.08 within no time, hmm ok</description><pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:06:53 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>seen worse plays, laying 13 ticks lower than SP after 4-0 off 1 isnt a bad play imvho of coursebut you lot continue what youre doing, ill do what im doing . . . it seems everyones happy</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/23637782/cardinals-49ers?post_id=423520346#423520346</link><description>seen worse plays, laying 13 ticks lower than SP after 4-0 off 1 isnt a bad play imvho of coursebut you lot continue what youre doing, ill do what im doing . . . it seems everyones happy</description><pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:06:19 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>"switched on them somehow" i know, i know its complicated :D</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/23637782/cardinals-49ers?post_id=423520342#423520342</link><description>"switched on them somehow" i know, i know its complicated :D</description><pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:05:20 -0600</pubDate></item><item><title>must be so nice to never lose despite making the worst lay youll ever see</title><link>https://community.betfair.com/north_american/go/thread/view/94138/23637782/cardinals-49ers?post_id=423520338#423520338</link><description>must be so nice to never lose despite making the worst lay youll ever see</description><pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:05:00 -0600</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
