Motor Sports

Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
pug munter
01 Nov 09 09:27
Date Joined: 13 Sep 02
| Topic/replies: 1,057 | Blogger: pug munter's blog
1. Lewis Hamilton, McLaren, 658.5kg
2. Sebastian Vettel, Red Bull, 663
3. Mark Webber, Red Bull, 660
4. Rubens Barrichello, Brawn GP, 655
5. Jenson Button, Brawn GP, 657
6. Jarno Trulli, Toyota, 661
7. Robert Kubica, BMW Sauber, 654.5
8. Nick Heidfeld, BMW Sauber, 664
9. Nico Rosberg, Williams, 665
10. Sebastien Buemi, Toro Rosso, 661.5
11. Kimi Raikkonen, Ferrari, 692
12. Kamui Kobayashi, Toyota, 694.3
13. Heikki Kovalainen, McLaren, 697
14. Kazuki Nakajima, Williams, 704
15. Jaime Alguersuari, Toro Rosso, 696.5
16. Fernando Alonso, Renault, 708.3
17. Vitantonio Liuzzi, Force India, 695
18. Adrian Sutil, Force India, 696
19. Romain Grosjean, Renault, 710.8
20. Giancarlo Fisichella, Ferrari, 692.5

Lewis lighter than the Red Bulls, although I personally think his price is too short on here, a lay for me.
Pause Switch to Standard View Abu Dhabi weights.
Show More
Report catfloppo November 1, 2009 9:46 AM GMT
He is also quite a lot faster.
Report flash bookie November 1, 2009 9:54 AM GMT
lewis 2 laps lighter on fuel but will surely be at least 5 secs in front by his first pit stop ? hard to see lewis not winning today
Report Alex the old wrinkled retainer November 1, 2009 10:00 AM GMT
8-9 seconds, I reckon.
Report baracouda30 November 1, 2009 10:45 AM GMT
Just had a small bet on Vettel @ 6.8.

No-one else is going to give Hamilton a race. I really don't rate Webber that highly (probably gonna win by half a lap now!) as he seems to make too many mistakes for my liking.

Can't be having Hamilton at the price. Surely he'll want to put it into the barrier at the first corner so he can get an early night with Nicole?
Report Green Board November 1, 2009 10:54 AM GMT
I actually think the best value is Hamilton - he's looked best all weekend. Not sure whther to back at such low odds yet mind and havea small green on the field.
Report flash bookie November 1, 2009 11:01 AM GMT
baracouda . it depends on what u call value/ price i have to agree with greenbeards above comments am afraid i am backing hamilton at the prices he is the best value imo
Report hOOd November 1, 2009 11:04 AM GMT
It does look like Hamilton can only lose this because of an accident or mechanical failure so laying him for a podium at 1.2 might be better than laying him for the win
Report if only November 1, 2009 11:24 AM GMT
anyone any thoughts on fastest lap thinking of laying hamilton
Report __JC_GT__ November 1, 2009 11:27 AM GMT
Hamilton =**y & Confident = Going all out for the fastest laps at the end of each stint = most probably getting it.
Report Total Max November 1, 2009 11:29 AM GMT
Hamilton will walk this. If no KERS then I'd lay Hamilton big time but as KERS he's got the start sorted already
Report hello-hello November 1, 2009 11:40 AM GMT
lewis first lap leader even though sort odds looks a banker.

he will just use his curse well to get off to a good start and go wire to wire.

short odds yes but cant see him not leading after first lap
Report rupertthebear November 1, 2009 11:45 AM GMT
curse!! FFS
Report hello-hello November 1, 2009 11:47 AM GMT
lol kers
Report baracouda30 November 1, 2009 11:51 AM GMT
Yes it depends on what you call value.

I lumped on Real Madrid yesterday and got away with it after they had a man sent off early on.

To me, with mechanical failure/crashing etc in the equation,I couldn't back anyone at that price.
Better to have a smaller bet on a bigger price and have a run for your money.

Report Miami2017 November 1, 2009 11:51 AM GMT
Looking at the weights, Raikonnen to score some points at 1.7 looks the value
Report pug munter November 1, 2009 12:46 PM GMT
pug munter 01 Nov 10:27

Lewis lighter than the Red Bulls, although I personally think his price is too short on here, a lay for me.

ker ching
Report welshbandit November 12, 2009 3:59 PM GMT
Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.


Instance ID: 13539